Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mastergill
Of course i was teasing you - don't be afraid about amp stages - sometime you can get very close or even better than the fabled "wire with gain".
|
Not sure how «very close» is... but I don't doubt that you can make the sound even «better» with additional electronics than from a wire with gain, i.e. the original signal. But why invest that much in euphony, thus self-deception?!
Quote:
Do you really think i need to argue over the internet to feel better about my stuff!? JaZZ, please, listening is enough.  |
You see, if you can tease me, I can do the same...

Honestly, I'm not a pure purist myself. I use a headphone amp as well, although I could renounce it. Why? Firstly, because it sounds a bit «better» (let's call it more organic and forgiving!) than the direct connection to my Bel Canto DAC2 (although, of course, less accurate and inferior in the single «technically» criteria). And secondly, because my McCormack UDP-1 doesn't allow direct connection because of its high output impedance. I would be happy if it would, because what I can hear from the (unfortunately) too low output signal is of highest delicacy and accuracy. So the UDP-1 through a good headphone amp sounds better than the direct connection to the DAC2.
Nevertheless, my point is: The «better» the sound created by the amp, the greater the chance that it's farther away from the original signal -- on a certain price level, well understood (this my experience so far). That's not the «price» I'm ready to pay for euphony.
(I'd like to point out that I exclude the potential quality gain through balanced drive from these direct-connection considerations.)
.