Quote:
|
Originally Posted by K2Grey
I hate it when these so-called "objectivists" come into threads and crap all over anyone who's a fan of products that they don't like. If you don't think it's a good product, why bother posting? Just don't buy the product, you don't have to loudly advertise that fact, whether to ruin other's enjoyment or to make yourself feel superior.
Peter Belt has alot of experience in high-end audio, I trust him to make good products. His ears are not inferior to that of most audiophiles.
Edit: For me, so long as it sounds good, I don't care what kind of technological claims he makes or if it uses quantum technology or MFET or if he says that the clock was made by an angel. What matters is how it sounds to my ears.
|
Awesome! Then you are prepared to buy one and report the first Head-fi impression? Please do! And bring one to a meet, I'm certain that all the gear will benefit from its hidden presence in the room

The big difference between your parody post and, say, the arguments that are proponents of the Turbodock, are that there are plenty of head-fiers who have bought it, used it, liked it, and kept it. So if you are serious, go buy your clock and tell us if you think it sounds better. That's the Subjectivist way - actually hearing it and deciding for yourself
