MonkeyMan from other UR5 thread:
Quote:
I have a UR-6, and it absolutely SMOKES my Tara Labs "The Zero" 1.0m RCA interconnect. That ought to speak volumes, since the Tara retailed for about $12k USD when I bought it...
My big-rig is not listed in my profile, but here's what's sitting in front of me as I type this:
Speakers: Westlake BBSM-15f
Amplifier: Boulder 2060
Preamplifier: Boulder 2010
Digital Source: dCS P8i
FM Tuner Source: Magnum Dynalab MD-108
I should mention that the Sony SCD-1 listed in my headphone rig used to be the digital source in my big-rig. The SCD-1 sounds better via the RCA outputs (IMHO), so I used an RCA terminated interconnect and a set of the Cardas RCA/XLR adapters to get the signal into the 2010. |
Grover UR6
I have spent a little time with latest UR6 from Grover and will begin discussing my findings.......am purposely not starting another thread because there are too many Grover threads now and we loose all valuable previous info when new threads are always started.
After 48hrs on FryKleaner into stereo system it went replacing the UR5 and playing another 24hrs before serious listening. Pulling out my notepad from previous cables/sessions I heard further improvements in detail resolution and soundstage presentation. I think ET should hear UR6 as I no longer will concede that X1 is slightly more detailed, I feel UR6 has matched it there and added to its advantage in soundstage presentaion which is really impressive now........perhaps MonkeyMan can comment further?
The tone balance is slightly different now, a bit less full and warm toned like UR5, it now has a faster more agile bounce to its step, a touch more treble energy and extension. If you made a hybrid of X1 and UR5 sounds the result would be UR6, as usual not sure what changes Grover has made to acheive this. Still has natural relaxed detailed presention that makes almost any type of music sound its best........I have many rock recordings with typical grain and glare sound and UR5/UR6 can play these more cleanly/smoothly than Oritek or Wolff, yet still magically match these great cables in detail resolution and soundstage, somehow it minimizes CD sound flaws best.
This is the quality that keeps me a Grover fan.......the universal ability to make any type of recording sound its best while minimizing its flaws. Vast majority of my music collection is your average rock recordings so my primary goal to to make these sound as good overall as possible.
There has been some discussion here that the real goal of cables is to be completely transparant as possible to music signal, which sounds logical but in reality may not ultimately be satisfying for everyone.
I have local friends with 50K+ systems that sound great if you play the handful of acceptable audiophile CDs (Dianna Krall, Jennifer Warren, Ricky Lee Jones, etc) but put on "average" rock CD like Rolling Stones, AC/DC and it sounds terrible magnifying every small recording flaw, can't even make it through one song, painful experience........just an observation that ultimate resolution and transparancy may not be a satisfying goal for everyone
