Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gerG
You likely have a long foot on the LR or RF, or a short foot on the LF or RR. Diagonal swapping will not change anything. First swap the LF for the LR and check for a change. If no change, swap the RF for RR. If it is the feet, one of these 2 swaps will isolate the culprit. (LR = left rear, RF = right front, etc.).
As for 3 point vs 4, maximum stability will be achieved when no part of the body overhangs a tipping axis. The tipping axes are defined by straight lines drawn from foot to foot. In the case of a rectangular shape, like the Grace, this means a foot at each corner will achieve maximum stability. Reducing to 3 feet will make the unit less stable. Try it, place 3 feet under there in any formation that you like. Now go around and press down on all 4 corners, one at a time. At least 1 corner will tip. For the same reason, cars have 4 wheels. To achieve a stable platform with 3 feet, one could construct a triangular base large enough that no part of the component body overhangs a tip axis. If you draw this up on paper you will see that it is a poor use of space. The only advantage of a 3 point mount is that all 3 points will touch, even with irregular surfaces, or poor manufacturing tolerances. Trading a solid 4 point for a tippy 3 point is not a trade that I would recommend. I have seen a few products that are designed with a 3 point mount (most notably turntables). As indicated above, if the feet are moved far enough outboard the platform can be stable. This in not relevant to a rectangular component designed for a 4 point stance. gerG |
Then why are footers usually sold in sets of 3?
Thanks
Jay






