Just wondering about this, because it seems like so many people who try AC filtration or AC regeneration devices in their loudspeaker systems end up selling them. The complaint often seems to be that both types of devices can quash "dynamics" or "homogenize the sound", etc.., Suspicious that normal current delivery is being restricted or modified by these AC devices, they remove them and re-discover the lost "sparkle" and "dynamics" that were lost. Perhaps some people simply can't get used to the hash-free sound of clean AC?. Or perhaps, the sonic signatures of some audio components were created in the presence of bad AC in mind? Maybe the intended "voice" of some components is altered when clean AC is introduced into the system?
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Cables, Power, Tweaks, Speakers, Accessories (DBT-Free Forum) › Perhaps.., many components are "voiced" with the sound of dirty AC?
Join Now
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Recent Reviews
-
All I have to say is that their awesome pair of headphones. Great sound stage, vocals are a bit too strong, you can feel the bass other than hearing it, and great for movies. Comfort is 4.5...
-
I know people bash on Bose because of they're over priced and I agree. I believe these retail for about $150 or so and I paid $85 for these due to employee discount at where I work. With that...
-
I bought these headphones as an upgrade from my BD DT-770 Pro 80Ohm. The are better in all areas, except that the right can can't handle bass. As soon as there are low bass it just becomes a...
-
I just picked these up today so this is just an initial assessment. These are a great sounding headphone overall but the fact that they are also closed back and still have great soundstage at...
-
everything about these headphones is flawless. Everything is balanced, and perfect. Any of the reviews that didn't like them most likely have a fake pair, or, hate life. The only thing I could...
Head-Fi Sponsors
Drop by and thank our partners for helping keep the lights on at Head-Fi!
Perhaps.., many components are "voiced" with the sound of dirty AC?
post #2 of 18
10/30/05 at 10:46am
- markl
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
Hangin' with the monkeys.
Member of the Trade: Lawton Audio -
- offline
- 9,204 Posts. Joined 6/2001
- Select All Posts By This User
There's a big difference between power conditioners and regenerators. Conditioners filter the AC (i.E. work by removing certain grunge and distortion), so their effect is subtractive. Power regenerators take the AC and completely recreate it in all its untrammeled and unpolluted glory. Unless one has hooked up a 1500 watt multi-channel amp up to a regenerator that can only handle 300 watts, there should be no loss of dynamics.
Power conditioning is going to be more effective where the power is dirtier (i.e. urban areas, or suburban areas where people are packed closely together, lots of EFI/RMI interference in the aire, etc.). In those situations, removing nasties can be a real help. OTOH, if one is out in the country, your power may be clean already, so adding a filter may actually appear to detract from the sound.
There's no component that's going to benefit from bad power or sound better with dirty AC. But in some cases, the "cure" provided by certain power conditioning devices may be worse than the disease. Not all power conditioners are created equal as well, so results will vary from unit to unit and installation to installation depending on what exactly is plaguing your AC.
OTOH, there's another possibility in that some distortion can sound good to some listeners. It's *possible* that some distortion can end up being euphonic, or that say, one listener likes the extra roughness, graininess, or jagged edges in the treble region (for example) because they can sound more "sparkly" or "vivid" with a more "exciting" texture or whatever with AC grunge present. I think that's possible.
Power conditioning is going to be more effective where the power is dirtier (i.e. urban areas, or suburban areas where people are packed closely together, lots of EFI/RMI interference in the aire, etc.). In those situations, removing nasties can be a real help. OTOH, if one is out in the country, your power may be clean already, so adding a filter may actually appear to detract from the sound.
There's no component that's going to benefit from bad power or sound better with dirty AC. But in some cases, the "cure" provided by certain power conditioning devices may be worse than the disease. Not all power conditioners are created equal as well, so results will vary from unit to unit and installation to installation depending on what exactly is plaguing your AC.
OTOH, there's another possibility in that some distortion can sound good to some listeners. It's *possible* that some distortion can end up being euphonic, or that say, one listener likes the extra roughness, graininess, or jagged edges in the treble region (for example) because they can sound more "sparkly" or "vivid" with a more "exciting" texture or whatever with AC grunge present. I think that's possible.
- Michael G.
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- online
- 299 Posts. Joined 8/2005
- Location: Rocky Mountains, USA.
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by markl
There's no component that's going to benefit from bad power or sound better with dirty AC. But in some cases, the "cure" provided by certain power conditioning devices may be worse than the disease. Not all power conditioners are created equal as well, so results will vary from unit to unit and installation to installation depending on what exactly is plaguing your AC.
OTOH, there's another possibility in that some distortion can sound good to some listeners. It's *possible* that some distortion can end up being euphonic, or that say, one listener likes the extra roughness, graininess, or jagged edges in the treble region (for example) because they can sound more "sparkly" or "vivid" with a more "exciting" texture or whatever with AC grunge present. I think that's possible. |
post #4 of 18
10/30/05 at 12:43pm
- Sovkiller
- Trader Feedback: +4
- Proved that despite its huge size the CD3000 can be shoved down one's throat.
-
- offline
- 13,024 Posts. Joined 7/2002
- Location: West New York, NJ
- Select All Posts By This User
Well I use power conditioners myself, just for precaution, and because I have got them really cheap, but all I can say is, that if you have the funds go for them, as they will not harm, and they indeed protect you from surges, and anomalies of the line, but to what extend the benefits will be heard, this is not an easy question to answer, and all depends on how good or bad is the PSU design that you are hooking in, but if do not have the means to go for them (a really good one) better invest in more music, or a better designed amp, with a really good design on the PSU.
IMO, and in others as well, a good designed PSU has to be able to remove all contamination from the AC line, and this way you will have nothing to benefit from a power re-generator or conditioner, as the DC component at the output inside the amp should be really clean and noise free, of course good and well designed PSUs capable of cleaning, all pollution, are really expensive and hard to find inside of the majority of the "best buys" type receivers, you should go a little higher and even though.....
I know that many members will object, and there are tons of mythology articles written on the net, talking about the same, but I would like to see those writers in a really DBT listening to a treated line, that will feed a well designed amp with a really beefy PSU, and one hooked directly on the AC outlet in the center of Manhattan, in NYC....to see them fail miserably, same way as this DBT with the speaker cables, remember???...


IMO, and in others as well, a good designed PSU has to be able to remove all contamination from the AC line, and this way you will have nothing to benefit from a power re-generator or conditioner, as the DC component at the output inside the amp should be really clean and noise free, of course good and well designed PSUs capable of cleaning, all pollution, are really expensive and hard to find inside of the majority of the "best buys" type receivers, you should go a little higher and even though.....

I know that many members will object, and there are tons of mythology articles written on the net, talking about the same, but I would like to see those writers in a really DBT listening to a treated line, that will feed a well designed amp with a really beefy PSU, and one hooked directly on the AC outlet in the center of Manhattan, in NYC....to see them fail miserably, same way as this DBT with the speaker cables, remember???...



- Michael G.
- Trader Feedback: +1
-
- online
- 299 Posts. Joined 8/2005
- Location: Rocky Mountains, USA.
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sovkiller
I know that many members will object, and there are tons of mythology articles written on the net, talking about the same, but I would like to see those writers in a really DBT listening to a treated line, that will feed a well designed amp with a really beefy PSU, and one hooked directly on the AC outlet in the center of Manhattan, in NYC....to see them fail miserably, same way as this DBT with the speaker cables, remember???... ![]() ![]() ![]() |
post #6 of 18
10/30/05 at 2:34pm
One relatively cost-effective solution to get cleaner power is by using balanced power. While these devices don't regenerate power, they transform the usual 120V into +/- 60V (-60 on neutral and +60 on hot) and just like balanced cables help to remove certain unwanted interferences.
There's a DIY solution by Jon Risch and a kit from Transcendent Sound for $360. The assembled version goes for $460.
A FAQ by Equitech, maker of (rather expensive) balanced power devices: http://www.equitech.com/faq/faq.html
There's a DIY solution by Jon Risch and a kit from Transcendent Sound for $360. The assembled version goes for $460.
A FAQ by Equitech, maker of (rather expensive) balanced power devices: http://www.equitech.com/faq/faq.html
post #7 of 18
11/1/05 at 10:43pm
most regenerators are actually putting square waves into a step-up transformers , it makes the rectification in a bridge rectifier even more non linear than just pluging in stright 60 hz ac hence the power supply will have more ripple.
post #8 of 18
11/2/05 at 11:50pm
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by helix
most regenerators are actually putting square waves into a step-up transformers , it makes the rectification in a bridge rectifier even more non linear than just pluging in stright 60 hz ac hence the power supply will have more ripple.
|
But quality PSUs can very easily handle imperfect power, as long as it stays within specs. Indeed, most laptop PSUs and some desktop PSUs can handle anywhere from 100v to 250v. And as anyone who has taken a PSU apart knows, good PSUs have good line filters. In fact, I have a 200w Mitac (used in a homemade internet router) that went as far as using a preregulator. It would step up 100-250v to 400v and then step it back down to 12v, 5v, and 3.3v. It sounds like a step backwards, but I have talked to some engineers about this and they say that it actually makes design easier because the primary winding of the flyback transformer doesn't have to handle as much current.
post #9 of 18
11/3/05 at 12:09am
- Tim D
- Trader Feedback: 0
- I got a pornographic memory...
-
- offline
- 2,457 Posts. Joined 6/2001
- Location: SoCal
- Select All Posts By This User
Disregarding power conditioners and regenerators, I would wager that many people have systems that suffer from ground loops, but they just don't know it. People assume it will always come across as some massively noticable 60 hz hum, but that of course is not true and can just be an insidious hash that adds grain to your midrange, etc.
IMO it is best to nip ground loops in the bud absolutely and completely before even worrying about the rest.
So yes I agree there are probably people out there attempting to voice their system around a preventable fault. Ground loops aren't the most intuitive problem to deal with either for the vast majority of folks that didn't spend years in college as an EE or trained to be an electrician.
I once used a rather simple switchbox in my signal chain that had as an input the output from the soundcard of my PC. Even if that input was not chosen however and I was listening to a different source, there was still a ground loop issue that added grain and hash to the current signal which persisted regardless of if the PC was even powered on I believe. It wasn't so noticable as to cause significant audible noise or hum, but was just added hash, etc.
Plus I'd have to wonder about 'meet' conditions which just brings a massive amount of equipment to be set up together in a day as well as the inclusion of switchboxes that could easily color and bias impressions of certain amps or sources over another because they employ different grounding scheme in a less than ideal environment, or luck of the draw, etc.
IMO it is best to nip ground loops in the bud absolutely and completely before even worrying about the rest.
So yes I agree there are probably people out there attempting to voice their system around a preventable fault. Ground loops aren't the most intuitive problem to deal with either for the vast majority of folks that didn't spend years in college as an EE or trained to be an electrician.
I once used a rather simple switchbox in my signal chain that had as an input the output from the soundcard of my PC. Even if that input was not chosen however and I was listening to a different source, there was still a ground loop issue that added grain and hash to the current signal which persisted regardless of if the PC was even powered on I believe. It wasn't so noticable as to cause significant audible noise or hum, but was just added hash, etc.
Plus I'd have to wonder about 'meet' conditions which just brings a massive amount of equipment to be set up together in a day as well as the inclusion of switchboxes that could easily color and bias impressions of certain amps or sources over another because they employ different grounding scheme in a less than ideal environment, or luck of the draw, etc.
post #10 of 18
11/3/05 at 4:28am
imo regenerators are a waste of money, if your having power supply problems i think you'd still have them using a regenerator except now your wasting more power. why go ac to dc to ac then back to dc when you could just use things that have a real effect on the power supply such as bigger psu caps, chokes, ferrite beads, snubbers, a capacitance multiplier or a better regulator ic etc...
my first introduction to ground loops was when i was installing a cctv setup between two buildings, i thought my use of cheap coax instead of the custom $500 per 100' cable that the manufacture of the cctv system sells was causing the problem. i didn't have a scope so i couldn't tell what was going on. fortunately when i described the jumping vertical picture problem to a friend who was an old pro he reccomended me a video transformer that cost $125. that fixed the problem. i also built him a mic and pre amp and put it in a smoke detector that connected to the unused pins of cat 5 utp that we had already run across the street when we made the network and now the guy who hired me can spy on his employees.
my first introduction to ground loops was when i was installing a cctv setup between two buildings, i thought my use of cheap coax instead of the custom $500 per 100' cable that the manufacture of the cctv system sells was causing the problem. i didn't have a scope so i couldn't tell what was going on. fortunately when i described the jumping vertical picture problem to a friend who was an old pro he reccomended me a video transformer that cost $125. that fixed the problem. i also built him a mic and pre amp and put it in a smoke detector that connected to the unused pins of cat 5 utp that we had already run across the street when we made the network and now the guy who hired me can spy on his employees.
post #11 of 18
11/3/05 at 6:34pm
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by helix
imo regenerators are a waste of money, if your having power supply problems i think you'd still have them using a regenerator except now your wasting more power. why go ac to dc to ac then back to dc when you could just use things that have a real effect on the power supply such as bigger psu caps, chokes, ferrite beads, snubbers, a capacitance multiplier or a better regulator ic etc...
|
Of course, designing such a PSU is not an easy task, and my friend Christina Mahoney (a PSU engineer) actually uses a good amount of CPU power on a quad Britney "supercomputer" just to simulate various PSU conditions. In particular, the "worst case" simulation can often take hours or even days to complete on that really fast computer. Not to mention that some of the simulations require so much memory that the admins recently put 32GB of RAM in that computer. (Much fun unmounting the CPU cooling evaporators to access the RAM sockets, then installing the RAM, discovering that the new RAM blocks the TXVs in the evaporator assemblies, requiring a rework, and finally reapplying the sealant to keep out moisture.)
As for what I do, I use high quality PSUs along with APC UPSes and surge protectors. I can tell you that Antec PSUs are very good quality, although most will need a fan voltage mod (very easy) to keep it reliable. Nothing beats a PC Power & Cooling (except maybe one custom designed by Christina Mahoney), although those are very expensive. Fortron is regarded as the best "cheap" PSU.
post #12 of 18
11/3/05 at 6:57pm
- Jahn
- Trader Feedback: 0
- Headphoneus Supremus Prolificus
-
- offline
- 21,531 Posts. Joined 7/2004
- Location: Feelin' the ãââ¹ in NYC
- Select All Posts By This User
Yep, the only thing not fed into my PC1000 Monster Power is my amp. I plug it right into the wall - it sounds "cleaner" that way to me.
post #13 of 18
11/3/05 at 7:25pm
- Glod
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
- offline
- 1,358 Posts. Joined 3/2005
- Location: The Netherlands
- Select All Posts By This User
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tim D
"Disregarding power conditioners and regenerators, I would wager that many people have systems that suffer from ground loops, but they just don't know it.People assume it will always come across as some massively noticable 60 hz hum, but that of course is not true and can just be an insidious hash that adds grain to your midrange, etc."...
..."Plus I'd have to wonder about 'meet' conditions which just brings a massive amount of equipment to be set up together in a day as well as the inclusion of switchboxes that could easily color and bias impressions of certain amps or sources over another because they employ different grounding scheme in a less than ideal environment, or luck of the draw, etc." |
I have never been to a meet, I have only experienced that systems newly set up need to settle in somehow for a good sonic result. That in spite of that the individual components might have been burned in previously.
post #14 of 18
11/3/05 at 7:27pm
to star882:
what your descibing is a dc to dc converter or a switching power supply and nobody uses those in serious audio except for car amplifiers or class-d amps that are not even in the same league as real hi-fi gear. a switching power supply introduces a lot of crap into the supply rails, while that might be fine for your computer it's frowned upon in audio, thats why pro soundcards use seperate boxes for their adc/dac's. almost all the hi end makers of audio equipment use linear regulators in transports/pre-amps/dacs, even the power amp and tube amps mostly all use CLC style filtering. granted smps are harder to make than simple linear supplys but the point is they don't sound good. the reasoning behind smps is that they are cheap to make in quanity. that tiny little 2" toriod transformer switching at 100khz in your computer is about 1/100th the price of a real 500va transformer. and you say the switching transistor has to be precisely controlled, not true it's almost always a cheap power mosfet just turning on and off going into a hi speed diode to prevent back emf and then on to a choke and a cap for smoothing all controled by a 0.50 cent ic. if your friend needs a super computer to design smps supplys then i'd have to say wtf why doesn't he just look at the application notes on one of the many cheap ic's that are made to do the job, nothing hard about that. in short smps are used when you need to be cheap and also need efficiency. you almost never see them included in good audio products and their's a reason for that, they suck.
edit: i just have to add you don't need a supercomputer to run OrCad (the best sim out there) so your friend is probably ********ing just a bit about what he does, oh and i have made maybe 100+ power supplys, its easy. i find the less people know about electricity the more they imagine things.
what your descibing is a dc to dc converter or a switching power supply and nobody uses those in serious audio except for car amplifiers or class-d amps that are not even in the same league as real hi-fi gear. a switching power supply introduces a lot of crap into the supply rails, while that might be fine for your computer it's frowned upon in audio, thats why pro soundcards use seperate boxes for their adc/dac's. almost all the hi end makers of audio equipment use linear regulators in transports/pre-amps/dacs, even the power amp and tube amps mostly all use CLC style filtering. granted smps are harder to make than simple linear supplys but the point is they don't sound good. the reasoning behind smps is that they are cheap to make in quanity. that tiny little 2" toriod transformer switching at 100khz in your computer is about 1/100th the price of a real 500va transformer. and you say the switching transistor has to be precisely controlled, not true it's almost always a cheap power mosfet just turning on and off going into a hi speed diode to prevent back emf and then on to a choke and a cap for smoothing all controled by a 0.50 cent ic. if your friend needs a super computer to design smps supplys then i'd have to say wtf why doesn't he just look at the application notes on one of the many cheap ic's that are made to do the job, nothing hard about that. in short smps are used when you need to be cheap and also need efficiency. you almost never see them included in good audio products and their's a reason for that, they suck.
edit: i just have to add you don't need a supercomputer to run OrCad (the best sim out there) so your friend is probably ********ing just a bit about what he does, oh and i have made maybe 100+ power supplys, its easy. i find the less people know about electricity the more they imagine things.
post #15 of 18
11/3/05 at 8:20pm
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by helix
to star882:
what your descibing is a dc to dc converter or a switching power supply and nobody uses those in serious audio except for car amplifiers or class-d amps that are not even in the same league as real hi-fi gear. a switching power supply introduces a lot of crap into the supply rails, while that might be fine for your computer it's frowned upon in audio, thats why pro soundcards use seperate boxes for their adc/dac's. almost all the hi end makers of audio equipment use linear regulators in transports/pre-amps/dacs, even the power amp and tube amps mostly all use CLC style filtering. granted smps are harder to make than simple linear supplys but the point is they don't sound good. the reasoning behind smps is that they are cheap to make in quanity. that tiny little 2" toriod transformer switching at 100khz in your computer is about 1/100th the price of a real 500va transformer. and you say the switching transistor has to be precisely controlled, not true it's almost always a cheap power mosfet just turning on and off going into a hi speed diode to prevent back emf and then on to a choke and a cap for smoothing all controled by a 0.50 cent ic. if your friend needs a super computer to design smps supplys then i'd have to say wtf why doesn't he just look at the application notes on one of the many cheap ic's that are made to do the job, nothing hard about that. in short smps are used when you need to be cheap and also need efficiency. you almost never see them included in good audio products and their's a reason for that, they suck. edit: i just have to add you don't need a supercomputer to run OrCad (the best sim out there) so your friend is probably ********ing just a bit about what he does, oh and i have made maybe 100+ power supplys, its easy. i find the less people know about electricity the more they imagine things. |
As for noise, note that it's possible to design a switcher that has very little noise on the output. It's also possible to follow a switcher with a linear to further reduce noise.
Return Home
- Perhaps.., many components are "voiced" with the sound of dirty AC?
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Cables, Power, Tweaks, Speakers, Accessories (DBT-Free Forum) › Perhaps.., many components are "voiced" with the sound of dirty AC?
Currently, there are 2106 Active Users
(489 Members and 1617 Guests)
Recent Discussions
- › Feedback for Justin's Headphone Modding (jschristian44) 33 seconds ago
- › The New ATH-CKM500..The best CKM earphone yet. 44 seconds ago
- › Final Audio Adagio ii vs Klipsch S4 - Reviews 45 seconds ago
- › Show us your Head-Fi station at it's current state. No old... 1 minute ago
- › 「Official」Asian Anime, Manga, and Music Lounge 3 minutes ago
- › The Deals Thread 4 minutes ago
- › Philips SHE3580 IEM review--$10 giant killers--ER-4P gathering dust 4 minutes ago
- › Need help choosing In Earphones 4 minutes ago
- › Yamaha EPH-100 5 minutes ago
- › Rockit Sounds R-50 Review/Impressions/Appreciation 5 minutes ago
View: New Posts | All Discussions
Recent Reviews
- › Sennheiser HD 800 Headphones by DannyRox23
- › Bose OE2i Audio Headphones - White by emceelokey
- › Beyer Dynamic DT 770 Premium 600 OHM Headphones by kungmarten
- › AKG K 550 by JohnnyBlaze554
- › Audio-Technica ATH-M50 Studio Monitor Headphones by Headphonezz
- › Sennheiser HD 238 Stereo Open Aire Headphone by Squirelrepublic
- › Beyerdynamic DT-990 Professional Headphones by turgid
- › Phonak PFE 012 by drsamdc
- › digiZoid ZO2 Personal hi-fi experience by redguy
- › Stanton Dynaphase Sixty by voodoo do-er
View: More Reviews
New Articles
- › Comparing headphones: Sennheiser's HD... by Windsor
- › iBasso DX100 FAQ by DoctorHeadz
- › DIY Cable Info and Resources by Pingupenguins
- › Asr Head-Fi Threads Compendium by Asr
- › Headphone Buying Guide by keanex
- › Fostex T50RP modification summary LINKS - wiki by jgray91
- › Comparisons of the LCD-3 and the LCD-2 Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Posting Guidelines by Currawong
- › Comparisons of LCD-2 Rev. 1 and Rev. 2 by MacedonianHero
- › Membership Levels, Badges and Custom Titles by Currawong
View: New Articles | All Articles
Home | Head Gear | Forums | Articles | My Profile
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map
About Head-Fi.org | Join the Community | Advertise
© 2012 Head-Fi.org is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map




