Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Which should come first: cans, amp or source
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Which should come first: cans, amp or source - Page 2

post #16 of 27
Source first. Otherwise you will have headphones with nothing to plug em into

OK sorry,

1. cans
2. amp
3. source

In that order then you can see how nice a good source comes through -
post #17 of 27
Source First - There are lots of things to consider, not just one.
post #18 of 27
Why would you get a source if you had nothing to judge it with? You should obviously have headphones first, and if they don't sound good, try a different source, then if it still sounds bad, take the phones back.
post #19 of 27
1. Source
2. Cans
3. Amp

Well, I have IEMS, so amp's not that important. unless I want to spend mucho on the amp.
post #20 of 27
Sources I think are alot more stable. There are only so many sources to choose from, so you are more certain of making correct choice.
post #21 of 27
When it comes to Hi-Fi, source comes first. They are the first in the chain. Followed by amps (Pre and power amps) and speakers, with interconnects the last.

For portable, source (DAP with built in amp) followed by headphones then amps and interconnects.
post #22 of 27
OK this thread convinces me to go order a DAC right now

Good thing I have to wait until Saturday and resist the impulse...



P.S.: BTW I payed $20 for the contributing membership yesterday but
I don't see any changes yet. Anybody know what I need to do?
post #23 of 27
CSMV: Please share what the DAC is
post #24 of 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by mulveling
1 headphones
2 amp
3 source
Agreed. Get the cans you like first, match them with an amp that drives them well, then take your time finding a source you like, and that synergizes with the cans/amp.
post #25 of 27
While Garbage in, Garbage out is absolutely true, the majority of today's sources (CD Players, ipods, soundcards...etc) sound so good that IMO, the sound quality difference is more noticeble with different headphones.
post #26 of 27
of course have a large music collection too.

No point having a good source, cans, and amp, but nothing much to listen hehe.
post #27 of 27
I think, in general, you need to get your hands wet with a decent/good pair of headphones first. Who wants to listen to a Marantz with earbuds or some Sony's that they got from Circuit City or Best Buy? Plus, as others have said, it's easy and cost-effective to sample different sound signatures/house sounds with headphones. I would also think that the cans make the most difference with sound taste. Can you make a Sennheiser sound like a Grado with a certain source? Of course I suppose it also depends on what kind of source you're looking for and your budget. For instance, I'm all digital-/computer-based, so my source was hardly over $100 (hmm now that I think about it my portable source cost more than my home one .. ); for a Redbook or vinyl enthusiast, a really good source runs in the thousands (right?).

I suppose in some ways source-first makes sense, because if you know you have a decent source, you can rest assured as you dabble around with difference can house sounds that you're hearing a good fraction of the headphones' potential, with the amp as the final touch on the head-cake.

So whether or not source or cans come first depends on your situation IMO. Either way, I'd say amp third.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Which should come first: cans, amp or source