- 5,245 Posts. Joined 10/2010
- Location: Poland
- Select All Posts By This User
I can't see why it wouldn't be 1080p and 60 fps on ps4? infamous second son had the same type of graphics and managed to do 1080p with 60fps!
Published on May 13, 2014
We recently reported that Sony's website seemed to confirm that Watch Dogs will be 1080p/60fps on PS4 and implied that this will not be the case on Xbox One.
However, Sony has since changed the text of its website to remove reference to Watch Dogs being 1080p/60fps on PS4.
This backpedaling has led some to suggest that Watch Dogs perhaps won't make the 1080p/60fps on PS4 or Xbox One.
Not according to Ubisoft, however.
At a German Ubisoft event, Golem.de said that Ubisoft talked openly about the fact that Watch Dogs would be 1080p/60fps on PS4.
Why has Sony removed the information from their website, then? We don't know.
Perhaps the suggestion that Watch Dogs won't be 1080p/60fps on Xbox One is false and it is this that has caused Sony to edit the text?
It's possible, but we'd be surprised, given Ubisoft's apparent reluctance to make any comment on the Xbox One version of Watch Dogs.
Crysis looks awful, sure it has high rez textures okay textures and above average AA but good lord is it ugly, looking back at some of the screens I had saved from it; visually it just does nothing it's just brown and mud with grain.. Definitely a game where "Technically" looking great over shadowed actual art direction; is that your one example? I'm seriously hard pressed to find games that just with out a doubt actually blow TLoU out of the water; I'm not saying its the greatest looking game ever...but the claim you seem to be trying to make is falling flat very fast.
They issued a statement today to clear everything up.
Well, the thing with "next-gen" consoles is that they're never on par with the best current gen PCs on the market but they aren't really meant coz not many parents will be willing to buy a $2000-3000 console for their kids. Aside from that a real gamer's interest is not in the best of the best graphics - it's the games. And unfortunately like you've noticed a lot of great games are console exclusives - that's why I'll always own at least one console sitting next to my pc - coz I can't miss a great game just because it doesn't have supersampling, 4k resolution etc.
Yeah, resolution definitely plays a factor. Fps IMO not so much - for me 3-40 is totalyy acceptable and after 60 it's pointless. Actually there are times I prefer 30 coz it looks a bit more natural like a movie, otherwise it's like the Hobbit on HFR 3D - very immersion breaking for me.
Well, I actually returned one 120hz TV afer less than a week coz I just couldn't get used to it. Even at just above 40 fps things start too look weird and my immersion is ruined. YMMV coz it's totally possible that years of 25-30fps in movies and games have set my brain to accept everything above as unrealistic and that just destroys my immersion - for my brain it feels like I'm watching a behind the scenes video and not a movie or a game. Like I said it's the same with movies - some people claimed HFR looked so great and realistic but there's no force in the universe that can make me see another movie like that.