Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Cables, Power, Tweaks, Speakers, Accessories (DBT-Free Forum) › anyone compare grover UR to VHaudio pulsar?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

anyone compare grover UR to VHaudio pulsar?

post #1 of 21
Thread Starter 
hi, i ordered grover UR2 interconnects last month, i recently was informed the UR3 will be shipping which i am very pleased about.

ive read incredible impressions of the grovers, especially for the 150$ price point, the VHaudio pulsars are also around that price but i have not read much positive feedback about them... has anyone heard both brands? i'd really like to hear to some comments on the pulsars.

i am ordering a flavor1 powercord for my source after being satisfied with the improvement from adding flavor2 to my headphone amp. im considering a set of pulsars too for comparison purpose. im a sucker for combining shipping costs, esp when VHaudio offers 30day trial period.
thanks for reading,

ian
post #2 of 21
I am working on a big interconnect comparison in the near future. The contenders:

VH Audio Pulsar Cryo gold Eichmann IC
Oritek X-1 IC
Gregg Straley Reality IC
Grover Huffman UR2 IC
Grover Huffman UR3 IC
Audience AU24 IC

All will be 1.0m in length and all will be cooked on my FryKleaner Pro cable cooker (also look for a review of it in the near future)...
post #3 of 21
Thread Starter 
near future like tomorrow?

thats going to be great i cant wait to read it. any initial impressions on the pulsars?
post #4 of 21
Do a search in this forum for pulsars and you'll find plenty of info. Also check out Audiogon and Audiocircle.com for reviews.
post #5 of 21
I have not tried VH Audio Pulsars but they are very popular as mentioned above and reviews are easy to find by searching especially Audio Aslyum forum. The base model is close to same price as Grover UR3 but for upgrade connectors like Eichman Silver Bullet or WBT NextGen price jumps quickly.

I noticed in last year or so VH Audio has used Cryo Treatment on many of its products sold........
post #6 of 21
Thread Starter 
i was browsing vhaudio last night and to DIY the pulsars 1meter pair only costs around $70 with eichmann gold bullets. the cryo wire is $5/foot and bullet plugs are $35.

the price on the premade pulsar interconnectd went up to $160 for one meter pair, i thought it was $130 a couple weeks ago.

anyway i placed the order for the flavor1 so ill wait on the pulsars untill i find more info on other sites. ill just build them myself if i decide to try them.
post #7 of 21

Straley IC

I have a pair of these, doubt they're the latest version, though. I got some from him a while back when he used cheap but nice-sounding Rat Shack connectors. Then he sent me a pair with upgraded connectors, they look like a solid tube of plastic with minimal metal contact.

This is a very nice interconnect, and ranked up there with the best bang-for-the-buck along with the VH's, Grover's, Aural Thrills, and others.

I look forward to your review!

Todd.
post #8 of 21
Quote:
Originally Posted by WK446
I am working on a big interconnect comparison in the near future. The contenders:

VH Audio Pulsar Cryo gold Eichmann IC
Oritek X-1 IC
Gregg Straley Reality IC
Grover Huffman UR2 IC
Grover Huffman UR3 IC
Audience AU24 IC

All will be 1.0m in length and all will be cooked on my FryKleaner Pro cable cooker (also look for a review of it in the near future)...

Sounds like fun. I like that name 'Reality IC'
I wish I still had my Au24.
post #9 of 21
I've recently compared the Grover UR-2 and the Pulsar/cryo/bullets. I didn't do any kind of critical comparison though so I don't know how much I have to offer. I used them in the system in my signature. I ended up keeping the Pulsar's and sold the Grover's. Now, the Grover's are excellent cables indeed but so are the Pulsar's. The UR-2 is everything everyone has said about them so there's no point in describing their sound again, read the reviews and comments. It simply boils down to the Pulsar's sound a little more full through the bass and midrange and up top they sound a hair more relaxed. Classic silver versus copper thing here. But the Grover does not sound like the old silver cliche and the Pulsar's don't sound like your cliche copper descriptions either however they do point themselves in their respective directions and thus their differences. It's amazing how smooth and full the UR-2 sounds while it's amazing how fast, open and dynamic the Pulsar's sound. The UR-2 to me was just a hair bright, or perhaps just a hair too open for my system, sounding just a hair nimble too. The Pulsar's in my system sound amazingly fast, detailed, tight, clean and quiet just as much as the UR-2 (which the UR-2 excels at as you'd expect) but are a bit more full sounding.

Again, I didn't do a big comparison with them so I'm sorry for the lack of details. I listened to the UR-2's in my system for weeks before getting the Pulsar's and so I knew them well. I thought they were fantastic cables indeed but in my system, which to me sounds very neutral, they extended that neutrality and then shifted things just a bit toward being a bit directed to the treble and sounding a wee bit too nimble. The Pulsar's are in fact very neutral sounding too but they shift just a hair the other way, sounding just a hair more full down low and a less called out treble range. That struck a chord with me and fit my system well. The treble of the UR-2 was ultra detailed and a hair nimble, while the Pulsar's seemed less so but by no means rolled or slow to these ears. Space, dynamics, the frequency spectrum, bass punch and depth, all that stuff is excellent with both cables. The Pulsar's just made a better fit. I just feel the Pulsar's sound more full and liquid and the UR-2 more nimble and slightly brighter.

Both cables are outstanding values and both offer extremely high performance for their price. They break the old cliche's of copper and silver for the most part but not completely. Both have very high resolution, both seem mostly uncolored despite those small traits they exhibit, both do an excellent job at delivering the goods. Neither one of these could really be used as a band-aid of sorts, like adding warmth, or adding more treble or the like. They are both are relatively quite neutral. But again they both shift towards your typical copper/silver cliche's just enough to differentiate themselves. I'd look at your system and decide which flavor would work best for you.
post #10 of 21
Thread Starter 
thanks Sean thats exactly the type of impression i was hoping for.

i am using wooaudio3 tube amp with senn 650, the lowend and midrange is already very prominent and the flavor2 powercord upgrade for the amp brought out some bass punch. i am trying to find good deal on meridian 588 which ive never heard described as being bright at all.

following your impressions it would seem the grover ur2 would suit me better, but people are suggesting the ur3 also relieved some of the brighness or shrillness of the ur2 and also tightened the bass. UR3 may sound closer to how you are describing the pulsar.

at any rate if i get some free time after my source situation is resolved ill DIY some pulsars and see how they sound in comparison to UR3. for 70$ if they are favorable(even comparable) to the UR3 these pulsar will be a real bargain. thanks again

ian
post #11 of 21
I would like to chime in and add to Sean H's great comments and comparison, which I feel right on. I had both the Pulsars and the Grovers, but I kept the Grovers and sold the pulsars, sorry but both of these cables are great and its all about system synergy and personal synergy with one's ears.

The Pulsars have a much fuller bass, which I attribute as sort of a upper mid bass bloom, giving the bass on the pulsars much more presence. The bass on the Grovers does not exhibit this upper mid bass bloom, thus it sounds deeper, more linear, and not as full. Both cables do bass really well, its tight and punchy, pitch definition is right on and it drives on both of them.

The Pulsars have a huge soundstage, with great depth and the sound is truly 360 around your head. However, the placement of images is a little fuzzy and at times it can be hard to really pinpoint where exactly the instruments are located in the soundstage. With the Grovers, the imaging is laser precise, its so easy to tell exactly where everyone is located, however the actual perceived size of the stage seems smaller compared to the Pulsars.

I thought the highs on both were quite similar, they don't add any grain whatsoever and they are both smooth and silky. The pulsars appeared to have more air up top, a more airy kind of treble, and the Grovers was a bit more focused up top and seemed to have the edge in extension.

Both cables are very fast and offer amazing phase performance. To hear fast hits on the ride cymbal on the pulsars is amazing, and the Grovers are just as fast as well. However, the lack of a upper bass bloom on the Grovers makes them seem faster because you hear the bottom bass hits sooner and cleaner than the pulsars thus you get a more propelling type of feel to the music like its drawing you forward, whereas the Pulsars seem to be laid back in the groove. For example, in Jazz you can play behind the beat and really dig in the pocket of the groove, or you can play slightly ahead of the beat and push the music forward. The pulsars sound slightly behind the beat giving its PRAT a very laid back kind of groove and the Grovers seem to be a bit ahead of the beat, conveying a more forward propulsion sense to the rhythm. These are very minimal and subtle changes of course, and I must reiterate that I would consider both cables to be very fast and right on with PRAT, just 2 different interpretations.

Taking into account system synergy, the Meridians have a huge soundstage, and its nice to have some more focus to the images in its vast soundscape. Meridians are known to be slightly slow and laid back in timing, so the Grovers give it a extra kick to get it going. My Grado RS-1's have a bit of a upper mid bass bloom, and the Grovers don't accentuate that any further. So, in my specific system, the Grovers appeared to congeal a little bit more with the rest of the team. The pulsars were awesome, but it simply came down to a personal preference and synergy thing, I bet Sean H's rig kicks butt and probably sounds just as balanced and coherent as mine, even though we're using different components and cables.

Hope that helps, let me know if you need anything to be clarified.
post #12 of 21
Thread Starter 
another huge thanks to rectsar for a great description, i guess its just going to come down to how my system synergy ultimately works out. its premature to make any decisions considering a significant source upgrade hopefully coming asap.

as of now your description of the grover seems to fall right in line with what i need my setup to do at this point, its alittle indistinct. not bloated bass like i hear so many people describe the 650, i dont think the bass quantity is bloated, but it needs to tighten. it blooms alot but the result is that is melts together.

same overall feeling for the soundstage, its very broad and while i cant feel it behind my head it does extend below and behind my ears... however the imaging is not as sharp as i'd like. and it can be difficult hear instrument seperation.
post #13 of 21
Wow, excellent comparison, Ryan. Heh, heh, I just don't have the patience or time to analyze it like that! Great job. You really described them EXACTLY as I hear them, perfectly. ian- I think you are making the right decision based on your system and desires, the UR (2 or 3 are likely very close despite some saying the 3 sounds fuller - that's my guess) would likely be my choice given the system you have. I've owned the HD650's and can guess what the Woo likely sounds like based on impressions.

In my case, I also own a pair of Ack! Industries The Analog Connect, an excellent silver based cable that was NOT beaten by the Grover. If I critically analyzed them they were very very close, so close in fact that it also factored into my decision to let the UR-2 go. These by the way are hidden gems, they still stand as one of the finest cables I have ever owned. Seems it's known among those who own the excellent Ack! dAck, which I do, and they know the excellent syngery they have. So, I still have that flavor to add to my system when I want to, that's when I want to hear those attributes very close to what the UR-2 offers. I am possibly making a move toward the RS-1's and a Mapletree Purist HD tube amp and if I do that, given the tube amplification and the RS-1's mid bass as Ryan described, perhaps the Ack cable will become more my choice.

Good luck, post your impressions!
post #14 of 21
Thread Starter 
the grover UR4 arrived today and they are exactly as people are describing them.

first of all they are incredibly, insanely, precise and focused. instrument seperation is incredible. although instruments are clear and fast they are also distant, im finding the soundstage to be too linear in front of my face.
headphones usually give me the feeling of being immersed in the music while now i am having the feeling of watching the music being played in front of me.

there really feels as if there is no bloom anywhere, very neutral and clinical. however, im finding the highs to be greasy. not bright or overly harsh, certainly not recessed either, just a sheen to them that seems to be blocking clarity. a typical complaint for silver interconnects? these characteristics add up to certain lack of emotion and leanness.

finally there is no fogivness for a less than ideal recording, they are so distant and compressed sounding, literally between my eyes and in front of my nose.

the differences between these and the radioshack gold series is so obvious id be willing to bet my life i could distinguish in DBT. the radioshack have a fuller and more engaging sound, but the seperation and resolution is nowhere close to the grovers. instrument seperation is muddled, bass is not tight enough and actually hints at distortion on some recordings that the grovers handled extrememly well.

so in conclusion i am going to hang onto these grovers and continue to listen as they burn in, but im also ordering a pair of the vhaudio pulsars to compare. from the desrciptions in this thread they seem to fit right inbetween the grovers and radio shack. if the engagement and dimension of the radioshack could be blended with the resolution and seperation of the grovers that would be the perfect solution for me. it would be a sound that is all around my head but at the same time not blended together in a way that loosens it up. id be standing in the middle of the soundstage so to speak, not out in the audience.

then again the pulsar might not be what im looking for either, i will have to sedate myself if comes down to odering a pair of 500$ wolff interconnects.
post #15 of 21
Thread Starter 
i received the pulsars today

first of all ive put about 20 hours on the grovers and they have not changed character, but i have become more used to the sound. i'd still describe them as front sounding and somewhat distant, especially in vocal presentation.

ive realized that the bass is not tight and punchy b/c its not blooming, it SOUNDS tight and punchy because there is an entire low end of frequencies literally absent. so what is heard is midbass without deep bass to give the illusion that its sloppy.

this effect works two-fold with the grovers, it sounds like the bass is tighter and its contributing to the seperation and front "stage feel" the grovers display.

for me low frequency serves as a foundation for the music, it gives the music presence. low frequencies slip into my subcounscious and create an aura of sound behind and under me that im not focusing on, but its constantly giving the music feeling while i listen to the dynamics being produced in front and around me.

i really feel the grovers have completely missed this dimension. all the sound is in front of me and im ALWAYS aware of every sound within the recording. as if im looking at the sound and everything is in focus, rather than hearing it around me with my ears.

im finding the pulsar just about the polar opposite of the grover and much more similar to the radio shack interconnects i described in the above posts.

the pulsars sound thick, there is amazing low frequency extension, and this creates that aura and feeling that i am experiencing the music, like its being created within my head but not trapped inside my head... but id say its about 10% too thick, the highs are really good with bloom and broad presence, i dont think they are literally rolled off but they do sound alittle rolled off b.c the sound is 10% biased toward the low end, it overpowers slightly

the mids are more engaging, vocals, horns, and guitar solos are more articulate and they sound fuller, i can hear nuances and tones better. vocals sound like they are actually in my presence. these sounds feel about 20% closer to me in comparison to the grover. the highs are definately a smoother and more liquid sound with literally no harshness, i have not winced, but they dont have that laser placement i can pinpoint with the grovers, this may be the lowend on the pulsar acting more as a filler sound, so there is not blackness between instruments, but instead an aura of MUSIC.

these pulsars are more fatiguing than the grovers even though the highs sound alittle rolled off, the thickness of the music fills my head and after awhile can feel like a throbbing

in comparison to the pulsar the radioshack have some of that same feeling and engagment, but they are not wide enough, there is less bias towards lowend but its very difficult to place a soundstage, the tones sound alittle off and highs dont merge and bloom enough. overall though for 15$ you really cant go wrong.

so im almost satisfied with the cryo pulsar with gold bullet plugs. i bought these premade but im going to assemble another set with silver bullets to see if that changes the sound at all, im hoping it will shift bias away from the lows and it will stabilize. im going to contact chris vennhaus first though to see what i can expect after these pulsars burn in more. the construction of theses pulsar is a solid copper center conductor, shielded in foil and silver braid, the silver braid is twisted and used as return. vhaudio gives the silver return credit for keeeping some the high frequncy sparkle.

i have another driver tube coming thursday if it changes the character of either intercoonect or the relative relationship between them i will post some more impressions.

if youve read this far i think youre really sexy
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Cables, Power, Tweaks, Speakers, Accessories (DBT-Free Forum) › anyone compare grover UR to VHaudio pulsar?