Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Salt Peanuts
FYI, whey RS-1's came with the wooden case, they didn't come with an extension cable or mini-adaptor that they include today.
|
,Abe
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
|
Originally Posted by Salt Peanuts
FYI, whey RS-1's came with the wooden case, they didn't come with an extension cable or mini-adaptor that they include today.
|
,| Originally Posted by Salt Peanuts FYI, whey RS-1's came with the wooden case, they didn't come with an extension cable or mini-adaptor that they include today. |

| I don't know what part you don't understand? Imported goods are more expensive than their domestic counterparts. Imported goods are cheaper in their originating country. In order to protect dealers, distribution networks need to be controled, and they are, through binding contracts. Each distributor is able to sell to their respective zone, which happens to be by country in most cases. The US is fortunate in that they are able to purchase directly from Grado Labs. This cuts out a middle man. The price then is cheaper. Grado sells the phones to the distributors of other countries at a lower price than he sells to the dealers in the US. He makes less money with the international sales. If for example, Tyll sold via the internet to folks in Germany, the German distributor is cut out of the equation as are the potential German dealers. If the German dealers feel they can't compete with online sales from US dealers who get their phones at a better price, then they will stop carrying the Grado line. This means fewer people will have access to Grado products through those stores. Grado has built up its business around "brink and mortar" stores, not online sales outlets, and out of appreciation to them, John insists on protecting them. This also means that the industry has a greater respect for Grado products and they will then likely more readily want to sell his products. Shipping costs Distributor takes his cut which also includes his storage costs Dealer takes his cut which also includes his storage costs The end result? The consumer pays more. |

|
Originally Posted by mikeg
I wish that I hadn't mentioned the R10, since there is lots of disagreement regarding which dynamic headphone is best. But, there is almost no disagreement regarding the HE90 being the best of all headphones. So, obviously the HE90 is the one to equal or beat, and hopefully at a lower price. I find it really hard to believe that a product that was developed perhaps two decades ago (i.e., the HE90) can't be bettered with 2005 knowledge and technology. As for the number of sales that Grado can make with such a headphone, since each HE90 costs about $5,000, it takes Grado the sale of seven or more RS-1's to make this much money. So, Grado would need to sell fewer such super high quality headphones, to make as much money as they now make by selling lots of lower cost headphones. And, I also believe that they would sell lots and lots of HE90-equivalent headphones, if they had the know-how to develop and produce them. And, think of the prestige that Grado would gain by producing the world's best headphone. They would thereby gain the crown of being top-dog heaphone producer, thereby replacing Sennheiser in this regard. But, if John Grado is either incapable of, or too lazy to grab hold of this opportunity, then he and we are the loosers. BTW, I hope that John Grado is reading this thread.
|
|
Originally Posted by recstar24
I hope he reads this thread but skips your post. John clearly stated why he has not really gotten into the whole new headphone thing - his priorities are very clear, spending time with his children and family is much more important to him than going through extensive research and development which would take away time he would rather spend with his kids.
It's easy for people to harp on the RS-1's, saying they are colored and what not or that they don't compare to the big-wigs like the HE90 or R-10. In my humble opinion, they are right up there, the RS-1's can do things which simply amaze and in certain aspects are unparalled by anything else i have ever heard. Sure they aren't perfect and are not for everyone, but they have a very unique and special "flavor" that on some music sounds heavenly, and it makes me realize that John is a freaking genius to be able to make certain instruments sound so freaking real. He has proven to me that he has the ear, know how, and resources to create something truly special, and I would imagine and bet that we have not heard the end of what John Grado is capable of. |
|
Originally Posted by toor
The issue is the distribution networks. Import costs apply to everyone and are not a reason to have these protections. Rather a distribution network is a method for a monopoly to price discriminate. Which is all well and good. After all a profit maximizing firm should always choose to do this. And generally speaking being allowed to price discriminate maximizes consumers and producer welfare. And I agree that monopoly protection rights will make distributors much more willing to sell Grado. I guess what I am trying to say is: I can understand what Grado is doing, but talking about things like shipping costs and import taxes is misleading.
|
|
Originally Posted by mikeg
Since John owns Grado Corp., I know that no one can force him to match Sennheiser's HE90. But, since John knows that the HE90 is almost unanimously considered by Head-Fi members to be the world's best headphone, I hope that his pride will cause his company to rise above their second rate status; i.e., second to Sennheiser, and Sony, in the production of top-notch headphones.
|
|
Originally Posted by Elephas
One question then is who, if anyone, is being groomed to take over Grado Labs the way John took over from Joseph. Granted, it is probably still too early to raise this issue, but due to the relatively small size and nature of the company, this is critical to the continued success of the company.
|

|
Originally Posted by Zanth
I was considering recabling my KSC 35's with some Moon Audio cables. Yeah, utter insanity but the stock cables suck..and the sheath tears easily. Now that Grado is comeing out with StreetStyles, I'll definitely hold off on doing anything.
|
|
Originally Posted by Jahn
Hmm, have 300 very happy folks over the span of 20 years who have achieved the last 1% of satisfaction in our hobby, or have thousands of happy folks who've never heard something as great as the SR60. If John wants to spend his time appealing to a wide group of folks, introducing them to great sound, versus busting his arse to satisfy a small group of folks for the elusive golden ring (look at Qualia, they spent tons on that and imho it still doesn't beat the HE90), I think John's goal of spreading the love is perfectly fine. And he gets to spend time with his family to boot, can't beat that!
|

,
|
Originally Posted by Zanth
He mentioned how he has demo'd the SR60's and the RS-1's to folks and there are plenty who can't hear the difference. Not that they would never be able to, but that they were completely content with the SR60's and walked away super happy. This is a testament to how good he has made the SR60's sound for their price.
|
|
Originally Posted by Zanth
The retro styling though is one that I think will be sticking around. They are completely unique in the market place, they are renowned for it (love or hate it) and they certainly fit the need of many.
|
|
Originally Posted by Zanth
I wouldn't want (personally) to just have an even more refined HP-1000. Some of course would
![]() |

|
Originally Posted by mikeg
Zanth - As I previoiusly mentioned, I have an RS-1/RA-1 setup, and I love the Grado sound that it produces. In fact, I listen to the RS-1 for more hours than any of my other headphones, and I also find it to be the lightest and most comfortable of my headphones. But, IMO the RS-1's sound is not as good as that of the K1000, and not nearly as good as that of the R10. As for my repeated descriptions of the HE90 as the world's best headphone, I reached this conclusion as a consequence of reading lots of Head-Fi postings. I've actually never heard an HE90. As for our Head-Fi membership comprising only a very small base of Grado and other manufacturers' clientele, that may be true, but we comprise a really good statistical sample of what headphone users like. My suggestion remains, that John Grado delegate the responsibility to develop a new headphone (possibly an integrated electrostat/dynamic one that matches or exceeds the performance of the big O headphone, but at a lower price. During development of such a headphone, I suggest that the Grado person in charge should frequently listen to an HE90, in order to evaluate their new Grado headphone's performance. My personal interest is to promote having an HE90-quality headphone brought to market at a cost that's less than $3.5K. As part of my effort to achieve this end, I've forwarded written appeals to Sennheiser Corp., and to Grado Corp. through the vehicle of this thread, and also shortly to Koss Corporation. So far, I haven't had any clear response.
|