Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Orthodynamic Roundup
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Orthodynamic Roundup - Page 30

post #436 of 19957
These Soviet headphones have definitely got my interest. No more of the overpriced collectible Yamaha crap, Yay!

More Oktava headphones under the second column here:

http://www.oktava3.narod.ru/

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #437 of 19957
Small addition to the pricing of original Soviet phones:

TDS-7 Amfiton: 47 rubles
TDS-5/5m: 55 rubles

55 rubles in mid-80s was a substantial sum. Starting pay the M.D was 110 rubles a month; a nurse in a hospital, working full-time, was paid 90 rubles/month.

I have own all those phones but TDS 16; have never seen Octava Electrostatic, not ever heard of them. TDS-4 Start were the very cheap dynamic variety; TDS-1 often had magnets un-glued after even small jolt. TDS-7, indeed, was most uncomfortable piece I have ever tried, nothing even come close. I agree what TDS-5 were, by far, the best ones (what's why I kept 'em).
Eugene
post #438 of 19957
Now I need to go back to my sources and figure out what these Oktava headphones were, now you got me thinking that maybe they were electret, and not electrostatic.
post #439 of 19957
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by yvfed1
I agree what TDS-5 were, by far, the best ones (what's why I kept 'em).
Eugene, you owned a TDS-15 but you say the TDS-5M sounded better? Despite the 15's more open back? How did the sound of the two headphones compare to one another?

Can you tell us the difference between the TDS-5 and TDS-5M?

.
post #440 of 19957
Wualta,

No, I don't know the difference between TDS-5 and 5M . As for open back - personally, I always preferred closed phones. To me, open-back types by itself defeats the whole purpose of the headphones, which is to me, privacy. If I am not concern about sounds, then I will not use 'phones. (On the same token, nobody builds open-back speakers anymore (worth listening, that is). Yes, there are Quads, and I don't like them ether).
Eugene
post #441 of 19957
I was not able to find exact specifications of TDS5 and TDS5m, but from members, owned both models, i understood, that 5M are more sensitive...but sound is almost the same.

http://rapidshare.com/files/30498676/tds.djvu


This is a table, taken from Russian hi-fi forum, of mostly type produced Soviet Union headphones, and their analogues from West side of the Wall, but at Russian.. its not so hard to see TDS models and other ones :O))

First column: model name of Soviet Union made heaphoned TDS = ТДС
Second column: type of driver, used in headphones
Third column: foreign analogues
4th column: resistance, Ohm
5th column: inequality of frequency characteristictic of sound pressure at frequency range 20Hz-20Khz, db
6th column: sound pressure level @ 500Hz, at 1 mW power, db
7th column: technical passport power, W
8th column: weight (without cable), kg
9th column: type of connector
10th column: Additional data ( mostly what is included with heaphones)
post #442 of 19957
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelic
I was not able to find exact specifications of TDS5 and TDS5m, but from members, owned both models, i understood, that 5M are more sensitive...but sound is almost the same.
Ah. Better magnets, perhaps. Or maybe entirely different driver configuration.

Thanks very much for this chart! It's easy to see that the orthodynamic types are the TDS models 5, 7, 15, 16, and 19. Then there are the intriguing H models: 21c and 25c. Whoa!

.
post #443 of 19957
wualta, actually at this chart are 4 types of drivers, used at headphones: isodynamic, orthodynamic, and 2 sub - types of dynamic. I didnt know what is the difference between isodynamic and orthodynamic.

Isodynamic (Изодинамический): TDS7, TDS15;
Orthodynamic (Ортодинамический): TDS5, Echo TDS 16; TDS19; H-21C; H-25C;
Dynamic, based on capsules (динамические на базе капсюля): TDS13C (H13C); TDS14; TDS17; TDS20; TDS22; TDS23; TDS24; H-27C; H-29C.
Dynamic, based on small speakers from GD series (динамические на базе головок)
( I know this, because I had also TDS3, opened them, and saw real small speaker):
TDS3, based on GD-50; TDS4, based on same GD-50; TDS6, same GD-50; TDS10, based on GD-54; TDS18, same GD-54.
Interesting, a lot of them using same drivers, for example GD series, but specifications are different... Big mistery for me, may its a dampening or something else?

I took a pictures, to show the dampening of TDS16...

A side of driver:


B side of driver with some glue on them:


Dampening materials:


Actually, very primitive, compared to AKG K701, but this construction can resist another World war.. and in some areas, they sounds better IMHO, to my ears, then K701.
Also for my girlfriend, they sound more pleasant then K701, and she have a very good hearing...Compared to K701, this are really small sized headphones.
She prefers them especially for rock music, and R'n'B, likes their bass punch, quitar sounds and detail resolution, so count her also new member of team orthodynamic :O))
post #444 of 19957
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelic
wualta, actually at this chart are 4 types of drivers, used at headphones: isodynamic, orthodynamic, and 2 sub - types of dynamic. I didnt know what is the difference between isodynamic and orthodynamic..

Isodynamic (Изодинамический): TDS 7, TDS 15;
Orthodynamic (Ортодинамический): TDS 5, Echo TDS 16; TDS 19; H-21C; H-25C...
It just keeps getting better. Interesting that they should differentiate between iso and ortho. Around here, there's no technical difference, only that the trade name Orthodynamic is associated with Yamaha. So maybe the Ортодинамический ones were meant to be copies of Yamaha headsets-- even though the drivers more closely resemble the German PMBs! Your guess is better than mine.

Team ТДС-15, onward!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelic
I took a pictures, to show the dampening of TDS16...
The damping is on the order of Yamaha's, which is to say, almost none, unless that cloth (it is cloth, isn't it? UPDATE: Yes.) is a very fine weave indeed. But mostly it looks too thin to have much effect.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelic
Actually, very primitive, compared to AKG K701, but this construction can resist another World war.. and in some areas, they sounds better IMHO, to my ears, then K701.
Omigod, don't say that so loud, we'll have the wrath of AKGott down on us. But I have been saying that a good ortho/iso can at least be competitive. Nice to have some corroboration.

Speaking of which, last night I put my A/250 Koss up against my damped T40 and was amazed at the difference in the presentation of the high end. Both 'phones have a very extended treble, but the Koss was harsh and metallic and the Fostex was smooth and detailed (some would say too much so). But I digress.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelic
Also for my girlfriend, count her also new member of team orthodynamic.
The TDS-16 looks much better on her than it would on me. If she likes her TDS-16 now, wait til you damp it for her... In any case, glad to have her as a member of Team Ortho!



Thanks again for all this information. Fascinating stuff.

We'll have three of each, please.

.
post #445 of 19957
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by yvfed1
Small addition to the pricing of original Soviet phones:

TDS-5/5m: 55 rubles

55 rubles in mid-80s was a substantial sum. Starting pay the M.D was 110 rubles a month; a nurse in a hospital, working full-time, was paid 90 rubles/month.
Amazing. We're dealing with the equivalent of a Stax Omega II, pricewise.

Quote:
Originally Posted by yvfed1
I have own all those phones but TDS 16; I agree what TDS-5 were, by far, the best ones (what's why I kept 'em).
And they do sound good. They'll be much better after they're damped and disc'd, at which point I'd like to think they'll finally be worth 55 mid-'80s rubles, only 20 years too late.

I hear what you say about closed 'phones, too. Before the Great Headphone Revolution, that's why most people put up with headphones-- they needed/wanted the isolation, and all headphones provided it to a greater or lesser extent. Acoustic isolation and privacy are even harder to come by today, at least for some, as we can see by the number of posts requesting 'phones with high isolation.

The only problem is that it's more difficult, for a variety of reasons, to get a closed headphone to sound good, and it's more difficult to improve the sound of a closed 'phone.
post #446 of 19957

T40 experimentation

Well, I finally tore the foam dome off the fronts of my T40.

I also got thinking about the reflex disc, and the first likely material to fall into my hand was self-adhesive aluminum foil.

I went with a reflex stripe, about 5mm*20mm, horizontally across the back of each driver (adhered to the scuzzy floor felt).

Sounds good! I agree that our friend Inkmo should tear the foam dome off his T40 as well. It's the easiest ortho mod yet!

The reflex stripe is a mixed success. I can hear what it's doing, it's good, but i wish it were doing more of it. Right now I'm trying to decide if i want to explore it a bit more by using a wider stripe, or two of them. Or if maybe i should just go with a nickel-sized dot like wualta uses.
post #447 of 19957
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericj
Well, I finally tore the foam dome off the fronts of my T40.
Welcome to the fold, brother. Baptism by foamdome. You are of the Elect.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ericj
Sounds good! I agree that our friend Inkmo should tear the foam dome off his T40 as well. It's the easiest ortho mod yet!
Glad you agree. Who else still has his T40v1?


Quote:
Originally Posted by ericj
I also got thinking about the reflex disc, and the first likely material to fall into my hand was self-adhesive aluminum foil.
Hmm. Mine had all the highs it could handle after just the spring-foam (that is, using a puck of opencell foam as a spring) mod. The floor-felt must not have the same springiness. Or else our T40s are different. I don't think our ears are that different.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericj
I went with a reflex stripe, about 5mm*20mm, horizontally across the back of each driver (adhered to the scuzzy floor felt). The reflex stripe is a mixed success. I can hear what it's doing, it's good, but i wish it were doing more of it. Right now I'm trying to decide if i want to explore it a bit more by using a wider stripe, or two of them. Or if maybe i should just go with a nickel-sized dot like wualta uses.
For max high boost, open the clamp, peel off the damping film (mine was held on with one dotlet of glue at the center) and put the reflex disc or tape right on the driver itself. Before you try that, though, try putting a dime-sized dot offset toward the top of the driver (ie, in the direction of the ceiling) on top of the damping film. The ear has a high-frequency sensitivity peak aimed in that direction. Should be enough for even the stattiest stat lover. If not, you've still got Plan B (direct stickage).

Glad you noticed the reflex effect. As long as it's used for good, not eevyll..

I quickie-compared my T40 to my baffle-plugged K501 and they were surprisingly similar on the top end when both were plugged into my Panasonic XR10. Of course the Fostex was better, but not by leagues and streets. Bass was about the same too, although the Fostex's is tighter when the boost is on.

Got a NIB T20v2 to run some parallel 'speriments on. Meanwhile, coming soon is a tale of woodbutchery, cookiemongering and quantum orthodynamics without bongos.

.
post #448 of 19957
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericj View Post
Sounds good! I agree that our friend Inkmo should tear the foam dome off his T40 as well. It's the easiest ortho mod yet!
One of the reasons I balked at the idea at first was because I got a little confused. My EA RP-15 has an identically designed (albeit smaller) foam disc on the front! I wonder if, in its case, that disc is helping things? Well.. I'm not about to take these apart. The Fostexen on the other hand...


Hey, btw guys. Have any of you Fostex peeps had problems wit the right channel cutting in and out, attenuating? I think mine has to do with the cable. It seems the plastic nubby-guys that screw into the socket on the left cup are a little scored, so I think it might just be wiggling loose.

edit: Oooh. cookiemongering. I'll take a cookie pleeze.

Oh, one thing I also found out: The mini to mini cord that came with my iAudio U2 fits into the Fostex cup exactly. It's a little thick for my RP-15 (shame because it's a perfect length).

I guess I'll just have to do some experimenting on my own and see what the deal is with the Fostex cable. Worse comes to worse I order a new one.
post #449 of 19957
I have a pair of T-40's. I bought them from a member here and they were discussed for about two pages on this thread. I promised him I wouldn't mod them though, so I'm living through you guys. Man are they power hungry.
post #450 of 19957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inkmo View Post
One of the reasons I balked at the idea at first was because I got a little confused. My EA RP-15 has an identically designed (albeit smaller) foam disc on the front! I wonder if, in its case, that disc is helping things? Well.. I'm not about to take these apart. The Fostexen on the other hand...
Well, on the RP21, the foam dome is not very tall, about 1/3rd what the fostexen have. Seemed to be mostly just an effort to put the foam only over the driver and not over the filtered vents around it. haven't seen the RP15 in person so i can't really compare.

Quote:
Hey, btw guys. Have any of you Fostex peeps had problems wit the right channel cutting in and out, attenuating? I think mine has to do with the cable. It seems the plastic nubby-guys that screw into the socket on the left cup are a little scored, so I think it might just be wiggling loose.
I have not had that problem. It's also possible that the jack is damaged or defective. The thing is the plug shouldn't be able to move around much, locked in like that.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Headphones (full-size)

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Head-Fi.org › Forums › Equipment Forums › Headphones (full-size) › Orthodynamic Roundup