Head-Fi.org › Head Gear › Headphones › Over-Ear › MrSpeakers Mad Dog (T50RP Mod)

MrSpeakers Mad Dog (T50RP Mod)

MrSpeakers Mad Dog (T50RP Mod) + add a photo
2 reviews
100% Positive Reviews
Rated #143 in Over-Ear
Pros:
“Sound, comfort, isolation”
“Special mids, good depth, very comfortable”
Cons:
“Cable is easy to break when removing”
“Not for bass heads, soft clamping force, tricky to get a fitting jack for recabling”
Write a Review

Member Reviews

Posted
By gorboman

Pros: Special mids, good depth, very comfortable

Cons: Not for bass heads, soft clamping force, tricky to get a fitting jack for recabling

This review will only talk about comparison between the MD with Dog Pads and the previous MD (with Shure SRH-840 pads).

I found each version has their own unique sonic characters. So it's more to your preference. But it took me 3 hours of sitting down and thinking hard, before I finally made the purchase of the Dog Pads version. Here's why...

The 840 version has a more forward and brighter sonic, thus making the midrange (especially for vocals) very special. However it fell short in the bass section. There is bass, but just adequate in amount, which to the broader audience translates into lacking bass or thin. The Dog Pads version has an improved bass response. I noticed improvements in bass body and punch. However the overall sonic is darker than the 840 version. An inevitable trade off, I presume.

The midrange is still special in a darker way. The depth is very good, instrument placement is clearly noticable. Layering is also good, I didn't notice any sound bleed to another. Comfort with the Dog Pads is better than 840 pads for a long listening session. Isolation is great and leak is also minimal. However, it is still not a bass head headphones. The Mad Dog is also not a forgiving headphone, so mind your music's recording quality.

The Mad Dog with Dog Pads will still benefit from amping. For me, I prefer a warm sounding solid state amp paired with a smooth analog sounding DAC. It did not perform as well on tube amps (tried on Crack and Pan Am).

That's all, folks! smily_headphones1.gif
Show more
Comments (3)
Was This Helpful? 

Posted
By dorino

Pros: Sound, comfort, isolation

Cons: Cable is easy to break when removing

 

Hello, everyone. These arrived yesterday, but I was unable to listen due to getting oral surgery that day. The suspense has been killing me, so here's a review.
The retail price for these headphones, with leather headband, is 315USD directly from MrSpeakers. Normally, I would consider this steep. However, I got them for a very good price and, after listening, would now be comfortable saying they're worth every penny of the full retail price and more.
 
Packaging: A boring white box with a sticker on it saying that the leather band is included. 2 pieces of foam keep the headphones in place. Inside are the headphones and a business card. Grado's pizza boxes are more interesting, but I've yet to meet anyone that cares about the packaging as far as appearance. I do not believe the headphones were damaged in shipping and they were fairly secure in the box. I will not take packaging in to consideration overall.
 
 
Build quality: As of right now I can not speak on the overall build quality. I would say it is better than a 7/10, at least, but because of circumstances beyond my control I am unable to speak otherwise. MrSpeakers, however, has been more cooperative than any person/company I've worked with before, even Sennheiser.
 
 
Cable: So far, so good. Near 0 microphonics. Seems durable. Hasn't tangled on me. I'm guessing it's the generic Fostex cable? +Respect to Fostex. Notably, the glue or whatever is here. That's a little dreary. The end entering the headphone is terminated with a 90 degree angle connector, and the opposite end is a standard 1/4 inch plug.
According to MrSpeakers, this is the stock Fostex T50RP cable.
 
 
Noise cancellation & Isolation: Pretty good. I can only just hear myself typing right now, with the headphones on (but no musc), and this keyboard is usually pretty loud. Obviously there's better out there, but I'd trust these on the bus as far as me not hearing other's conversations - or zoning out in a lecture. I wonder how much sound is leaked? Oh, my. Nearly nothing. I don't think a full sized headphone has ever been this quiet to other people for me. That's good. These headphones will do their job - mobile music powerhouse. These things beat out some IEMs in terms of how well they keep their sound to themselves (and you). I'm currently listening to a song, at average listening volumes, in a room I am not alone in. The other person in the room is watching the television, and it's turned up because they're partially deaf. My company can not hear my headphones nor can I hear the television (I can faintly hear it when no music is playing).
 
 
Comfort: The leather strap is nice. The pads are very comfortable and create a good seal. Comfort is pretty damn good - My HD598 are better but these are more comfortable than a stock T50RP and definitely more comfortable than any Grado I've owned. They also beat out the HD25-1 II, but I am somewhat unique in that those headphones were very uncomfortable to wear for me, where as others find them nearly ideal. To each their own.
 
 
Music test:
(Rig: Laptop -> HRT Muser Streamer II -> 18V JRC4556 Cmoy -> "Mad Dog")
(this is my standard portable set up)
I will listen to pseduo-random songs on these.
Artist - [Album #Track] Track (Encoding)
 
Gorillaz - [Gorillaz CD1 #11] 19-2000 (ALAC 16/44)
Sibilance is minimal, Bass sounds pleasant. This song sounds like it's supposed to - No obvious distortion. I like this song. Nothing is piercing. Hopefully this fairly generic song is a sign of things to come. Bass at the end of song is how it should be - Some other headphones struggle with the "WUB WUBwub wub" fading out. These do not.
 
Sublime - [Greatest Hits CD1 #01] What I Got (ALAC 16/44)
No sibiliance or piercing sound. Bass sounds great. Sound stage is impressive. The pan effect in the beginning of the song sounds fine, and doesn't sound irritating like it does on some headphones. Maybe it's because the soundstage is a little smaller than on open headphones? I don't know. I like it. It's pleasant and nothing's jumping out and hurting me.
 
Nina Simone - [The Very Best of Nina Simone CD1 #21] Ain't Got No, I Got Life (Nina Simone vs. Groovefinder remix) (FLAC 16/44)
This is a fun song. Despite me expecting these to be very analytical, they don't bring this song down. Nina's voice is good. The horns are pleasant sounding, the cymbals are not piercing. Just noticed - While this song has been some what sibilant on other heasets, it is not on these. The esses sound like esses, not like esssssssssssssssssses. Nothing is louder than it should be - this is pretty nice. The HD598's are pretty poor at this particular song. While it sounds amazing on thair pair, the instruments are sometimes drowned out, and when they're not, it's short bursts of piercing. I can get used to the flat signature on these "Mad Dog" headphones. Heart! Soul! Heart! Soul!
 
Leonard Cohen - [Old Ideas CD1 #01] Going Home (FLAC 16/44)
The sweeping isn't as loud as it is on my HD598's. Zero sibilance. Cohen's voice is very personal in this song (indeed, this whole album!) and this is really brought out. Nothing is too loud. Balance really stands out as being nearly perfect. The background singers sound fine, Cohen sounds fine, everything sounds fine. Very fine. Fine like fine wine. The instruments are ideal and the song is very nice.
 
LAB - [Devil Is A Girl #02] Beat The Boys (FLAC 16/44)
This song is rougher, by nature. However, it doesn't sound any rougher than it's supposed to through these headphones. Arguably, this is the only song I like on the HD598 as much as I like on this - for different reasons. The electric guitars are not piercing on either, but they're more present on the HD598. Unfortunately, they're more present than they're supposed to be. With the "Mad Dog", there is a much more accurate sound. The female lead does not sound sibilant. A good song, over all, and it sounds better than it ever did playing Fallout.
 
King Crimson - [In the Court of the Crimson King CD1 #01] 21st Century Schizoid Man (FLAC 16/44)
Sounds like 21st Century Schizoid Man. Some headphones I've tried have struggled to play this song. Soundstage/imaging is impressive. No sibilance. I'd be singing along if it didn't hurt to open my mouth (Sorry, I recently had impacted wisdom teeth removed). On many a 'phone, "Schizoid" sounds like "Ssssschizzzoid". The S being much more lingering and the z almost as lingering. On the "Mad Dog", it's sharp and quick. The bass is pleasant. The whole song is pleasant. The guitar at 3:40 has no issues nor do the drums that follow. It's all sounds right. I like right.
 
Journey - [Greatest Hits Live CD1 #01] Don't Stop Believin' (FLAC 16/44)
I believe this is the first song I've listened to recorded live through these headphones. Notably, there's little to no sibilance (Aside from where it's intended) despite the tendency for live recordings to not be of the best recording. Guitar sounds awesome, crowd sounds awesome, whole song sounds awesome. The drums sound and imaging is pretty good. This used to be one of my least favorite recordings of Don't Stop Believin' because of the comparitively poor recording since it's live. It's much nicer sounding, though. I don't think the headphone is "fixing" anything, it just isn't over exagerrating the problems.
 
The Silent Comedy - [Common Faults #05] Bartholomew (MP3 320kbps)
This song has a lot of singing by the group at once. It's actually pretty easy to differentiate their voices if you try. Despite the lossy encoding, nothing is bleeding together. On my HD598's there was more of the instruments (and voices) bleeding together. The bass in this song actually exists, now, though it's as it is supposed to be and is fairly weak. That's how this song is mastered - bass is just a whisper of a thump and more thump comes from the voices. No deductions for this headphone in regards to the first lossy song.
 
Daft Punk - [Discovery CD01 #04] Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger (MP3 320kbps)
I like electronic music, however, most of it is pretty hard to listen to on the overly bright HD598's. It's damn near perfect on these babes. Unfortunately, the clicking inherent to this song (or, possibly, my rip. I will try to find my CD and re-rip it lossless to see if it sounds better) stands out. I can't deduct points for that, though, because it's not the headphone's fault. After the clicking in the beginning (which is present on any headphone I've tried, keep in mind, but just a little more obvious here) the headphone really starts to shine. The 'vocals' are good, the whole song's beat is awesome, the bass is awesome, and over all, I'm beginning to realize why I used to listen to so much electronic music. Purists, kiss it.
 
Fatboy Slim - [The Greatest Hits - Why Try Harder CD1 #04] Weapon Of Choice (MP3 VBR)
This song sounds good. Nothing that isn't the fault of the recording is present, and nothing seems to stand out. The bass is present, not overbearing. I like Fatboy Slim and I like this song (who doesn't? I think everyone whose ever seen the video's fallen in love with it - Chrstiopher Walken would make a Dick Cheney speech sound good if he was dancing in the background) Slim's voice is nice, none of the instruments or loops are bad. No sibilance. I really foresee myself re-ripping some of these songs that I only had in MP3 due to low listening now that I can fully appreciate them.
 
Lady Gaga - [The Fame Monster (Deluxe Edition) CD1 #06] Telephone (featuring Beyonce) (MP3 VBR)
I haven't listened to much 'pop' on these. This is definitely pop. It sounds as good as Gaga's ever sounded. Bass is nice, synths are nice, and Gaga's voice in this particular song isn't totally unbearable (This is not the headphone's fault, just my preference). The song sounds as good as it ever has, but, alas, Lady Gaga will never be a favorite of mine. I can assure you, though, if you're a big Pop fan, you're probably going to like the sound of these headphones as they can handle it.
 
Yoshihiro Sakaguchi - [DuckTales (NES) OST CD1 #08] The Moon Theme (MP3 256kbps)
I was curious how this would perform with chip tunes. As expected, the song sounds nice. A little piercing, but better than it's ever sounded before for me. If you listen to a lot of chip tunes or VG remixes, these will do you well.
 
Pendulum - [In Silico #03] Propane Nightmare (MP3 192kbps)
I want to note that I could not stand this song on my HD598 headphones. Instead, it is very good sounding here. Bass thumps just right. It's fast paced and there's no sibilance or piercing. I'm very happy right now, because I used to love this song back on my now defunct Brainwavz ProAlpha earbuds. Now I can love it again.
 
Dschinghis Khan - [Dschinghis Khan #17] Moscow(English Version) (MP3 128kbps)
A poorly encoded disco track. Surprisingly, it sounds good. Bass is there, the voices aren't blurred together, and there's little to no sibilance. Encoding problems are audible, but not too much. This sounds fine.
 
Shugo Tokumaru - [Port Entropy #10] Suisha (FLAC 16/44)
Let's close the music tests with what is one of my favorite songs to listen to on the HD598 - Suisha by Shugo Tokumaru, a Japanese multi-instrumentalist. Everything sounds good. The string instruments are not lacking. Shugo's voice is more present. There's no piercing with the high notes, where-as there is minor piercing with the HD598. Soundstage is very pleasant. The song flows well and is good. I don't foresee myself taking these off and putting the HD598's on just to listen to this song.
 
 
Final notes: It's worth saying that the headphones have been on my head for around 2 hours and I don't feel any discomfort. They're holding up well, and, although they definitely require more juice than my HD598, even my relatively modest portable set up seems to do them justice. If I can get a hold of an ODAC/O2 (I'm considering purchasing both) for home use, we'll see if there's any improvement. They also seemed to run fine out of my iPod, though the benefit from the better DAC and amp was noticable when running from my laptop. If I didn't need to put an icepack on my jaw, I'd continue listening to these and enjoying them. I do enjoy them.
 
I will update when I have a mint pair on the build quality and durability.
 
A big thanks to MrSpeakers for the well wishes and interest in my opinions (as well as letting the warranty carry over to the second owner, myself)... and his interest in his product as a whole and my satisfaction. "Mad Dog" is the new Magnum, in my book. To hell with Grado, I'm a Fostex man now. No, I'm a "Mad Dog" man now.
 
 
TL;DR Ratings:
Build & Cable: ?/10. N/A
Noise cancellation & Isolation: 8.5/10. Never had better with a full-size headphone. Admittedly, I've not demo'd many closed sets for this long, but these are pretty damn nice.
Comfort: 9.5/10. The HD598 is a 10/10, and these are very close behind. They don't clamp your head, they look nice, and I'm all around beyond satisfied with comfort. In fact, I forgot they're still on my head.
Sound: 10/10. I have never heard a better headphone at either the price I payed or the MSRP. They bring out the best in music by bringing out everything. You don't miss a thing with these guys, and that's awesome. These blow away any headphone I've owned, and I would safely say they're comparable to the LCD-2 (which I have only demonstrated).
 
 
Overall:  9.5 
(Build not figured in because of extenuating circumstances)
Show more
Comments (2)
Was This Helpful? 
Edit Cancel Save Changes History

Facts and Details

MrSpeakers Mad Dog (T50RP Mod)
By:
Description:

Modified Fostex T50RP orthodynamic/planar magnetic headphones. Introduction from MrSpeakers's website: "We want your expectations to be unrealistic. And we hope we'll exceed them. When we built the Mad Dog headphone, our goal was to deliver a sparkling, musical and immersively realistic listening experience at a price many people could afford, without breaking the bank. We believe the Mad Dog blew our goals away. The Mad Dog is a really fun headphone and we hope it will make you want to rediscover your music library, over and over. Each headphone is hand modified and tuned to: Be super-fast and ultra-revealing Deliver exceptional channel balance with broad and spacious imaging Increase bass extension, while keeping it tunefull and tight The tech specs don't really mean much for headphones, but here are the not so gory details: Frequency range from 16-22KHz Efficiency: 92dB/mw Impedance 50 ohms MrSpeakers' Mad Dog headphones can be driven by most personal music players, including iPads, iPods, iPhones, laptops, PCs and other devices. It should be noted that we've come across some tier-2 brand phones and media players that really can't provide enough power to really drive this headphone adequately. To make the most of the Mad Dog headphones, MrSpeakers recommends the use of a good (or great) amplifier, DAC or DAC/Amp with at least 100mW per channel. The great thing about these headphones is that the better the source components the better your headphones will sound." The headphones had very good reception in the 2012 New York Spring Head-Fi Meet. It has been said by many who have heard both that the Mad Dog are a more neutral headphone than the Thunderpants, a popular T50RP mod.

Details:
DetailValue
Driver TypeOrthodynamic / Planar Magnetic
Impedance50 ohms
Additional InformationPrice: $299
Models:
Model Name/TypeMPNEAN/UPC
Links:
Edit Cancel Save Changes History

Guide: MrSpeakers Mad Dog (T50RP Mod)

Start a guide on MrSpeakers Mad Dog (T50RP Mod)!
Head-Fi.org › Head Gear › Headphones › Over-Ear › MrSpeakers Mad Dog (T50RP Mod)