or Connect

Superb sound and ease of use make the DX90 an excellent choice for your high-res DAP

A Review On: iBasso DX90 Portable Digital Audio Player

iBasso DX90 Portable Digital Audio Player

See all 15 reviews
Recent Pricing:
Review Details:
Audio Quality
Battery Life
User Interface
Purchased on:
Price paid: $419.00
Posted · 35521 Views · 9 Comments

Pros: Luscious sound, UI that's easy to use, sensible price

Cons: Tiny internal storage, UI features primitive graphics, troublesome headphone jack

I've been listening to my iBasso DX90 for several weeks and I'm extremely impressed by its sound, its ease of use and its firmware updates that are more than just cosmetic improvements. While I was deciding whether or not to purchase the iBasso DX90, I spent quite some time comparing it to the FiiO X5 and the wallet-busting Astrell & Kern AK240. In another life, when I return as a billionaire playboy, I will purchase the AK240 or its upgrade so the choice was effectively between the DX90 and the X5. My comparison eventually centered on the iBasso DX90's use of dual Sabre ES9018K2M DACs. I was also swayed by the DX90's apparently superior handling of micro SD cards in comparison to the FiiO DAP, which some reviews of the X5 have criticized as being problematic when using cards larger than 32GB.

The DX90's sound can only be described as luscious and rich. The dual Sabre DACs produce a fullness and an elegance to music that makes lengthy listening sessions a pleasure if not an addiction. Owners of Sennheiser's audiophile grade HD650 headphones will recognize this comparison: the sound of the DX90 is the DAP equivalent of listening to music through a pair of 650s. There is a similar rich sound quality.

Using the UI is simple and intuitive with just enough menu choices to make finding music easy and fast, though the display graphics are antiquated and primitive. One UI attribute I've found particularly helpful is the "directory" menu selection. which calls up all of the nested music choices in an easy to manipulate manner, breaking them down logically rather than in the hodge-podge mess you usually get. If you transfer a lot of music files from a box set, you will appreciate this feature's logical and intelligent presentation. The latest firmware update added several menu choices, The addition of a charge-only USB selection, added to the previous Storage and DAC choices, keeps all of the DX90's operations nicely compartmentalized. Gapless playback really is gapless, Play Modes are simple to manipulate. Music information is easy to call-up and fairly exhaustive.

High resolution playback of up to 24/192 has been error-free except for one album which proved troublesome, causing the DAP to hang after a selection was played. I have reason to believe that the error lays in the album's hi-res encoding and not the player. I haven't been able to reproduce the problem with any other hi-res files. The DX90 plays FLAC, APE, MP3 and WAV files with equal facility. I've found no difference in performance. I haven't tried DSD or DSF files yet, though the twin Sabre DACs appear capable of playing them. However, DSD files are not listed as playable so failure won't be unexpected.

One slightly annoying hardware problem that's cropped up is the headphone jack's selectivity when choosing which 3.5mm audio plug to accept and which to reject as being ever-so-slightly too wide. It becomes necessary to force the plug into the jack when this happens, something that makes me very uncomfortable. A couple of my portable headphones produce only a watered-down mono sound as a result of their rejection by the DX90. Since I own several pairs of portable headphones this is not a serious problem at the moment.

Charging the DX90 takes about three hours when using an AC converter, six hours in a powered USB slot. The DX90 is a bit of a battery hog, with around 7-8 hours of usage at standard resolution and volume, 6-7 hours while playing high-resolution files at higher volume. There is a rudimentary EQ included which lowers the volume when in use so compensation will be required. I tend to avoid using EQ unless absolutely necessary. There are several other features, all of which I found simple and intuitive to use. I've been using 128GB microSD cards, which are necessary since the DX90 only has about 5GB of internal storage. This was an obvious trade-off to keep the price down.

The DX90 is a superb sounding DAC, a great value at its sensible price point and quite easy to use. If you're searching for a reasonably priced DAP capable of playing high resolution music I think the DX90 is an excellent choice.


Can the DX90 power say, modded Fostex T50RP to a decent %-age of their desktop separates driven potential ? Can it bring some mojo to planars in general ?
I didn't think the DX-90 was robust enough to drive my HiFIMan 500s satisfactorily so I tried it. It can drive them and the sound isn't bad but they are definitely better amped. Forget my Audeze LCD-3s. Yes, you can drive them but nowhere near their potential. I'm guessing the Oppos can be driven as well as the new Audezes. The modded Fostex T50RP at 50 OHMs, I'd say yes decently.
First of all thank you very much for your wonderful review, I tried to drive my LCD2.2 and sounded quite well of course you need an amp to make the LCD to meet it's full potential. My only complaint for the DX90 would be it's playlist.
DX90s seemed to have a lot more "control" and power over the sound and it sounded pretty okay with HD650s and 600s. I think that the AK240 is the best for driving LCDs though.
My experience is the same as both comments above. The DX90 is pretty good at driving these headphones but in no way are they a substitute for amping them. The extra power is necessary to reveal all of the detail the planars like the LCD-2 can produce - especially the bass and lower-mids. The AK240 is a superb DAP and I'd love to own one. But man is it pricey. Running a DX90 into a Chord Hugo is my next move. This configuration using either the X5 or the DX90 has worked for a lot of people. The DX90's playlist and graphics is primitive at best. They made a lot of tradeoffs to keep the price down and that's one of the most troublesome.
I'm waiting for iBasso or Fiio's next models and saving up for the AK240 at the same time.
I would love to own the AK240 but WOW look at the price....That's why I choose DX90 for it's price & incredible sound. Fiio announced their next flagship DAP last December would be named X7 but definitely will not launch on this year.
The playlist function seems to work: really slowly if you have a large list. A recent firmware update seems to have improved it but it's still pretty rudimentary if you're used to creating playlists rapidly on the fly. The.AK240 has a fabulous UI and incredible features.The sound is better than the DX90 but not 6X better. Its a bit more elegant and transparent but not as rich and luscious. I'm informed that the dual Sabre ES9018K2M DACs.upsample low res files and there may be some effect on higher res files. The upsampling would create a richer sound. This is preliminary information and not written in stone. But the DX90 does sound really rich and full so it's at least possible that its a carry-over effect. Of course, I don't really care why it sounds so good, I'm just grateful it does.
Yeah the playlist of the DX90 is annoying to me, Sony ZX1 also provide good UI but the sound is not 2X better in fact DX90 sound better to me. For AK240 price I think I can buy a really good set of desktop amp & DAC, is just doesn't make sense to me. Overall although DX90 UI is not very friendly but for this price I am very satisfied especially the sound.