Head-Fi.org › Head Gear › Headphones › Over-Ear › Bowers & Wilkins P5 Mobile Headphones › Reviews › rhythmdevils's Review

Not impressed

A Review On: Bowers & Wilkins P5 Mobile Headphones

Bowers & Wilkins P5 Mobile Headphones

Rated # 59 in Over-Ear
See all 22 reviews
Recent Pricing:
Review Details:
Audio Quality
Comfort
Design
Value
rhythmdevils
Posted · 532 Views · 13 Comments

Pros: comfortable, looks (if you like them, but I think they're ugly)

Cons: feel cheap, bad sound esp for the price, expensive

I listened to these out of my iphone at the apple store the other day while waiting for my genius bar ticket to come up for my busted ipod.  I was expecting them to be built really well, and sound decent.  I was not impressed. 

 

Some say they like the looks.  I think they look like something that is cheap but meant to look classy.  Like one of those ritzy prefab homes.  But clearly some think they look cool. 

 

They were much smaller in person than in pictures. 

 

I was expecting great build quality from the impressions I read, which I appreciate in a headphone, but the metal on these is for looks.  They don't actually seem built better than any other well made plastic headphone to me, either by feel, or by looks. I think my ath-M50 could take more abuse than these.

 

The sound was not impressive.  I was shocked because I was expecting something that was warm, forgiving, rich, maybe something like my old K240 sextetts.  But they managed to sound muffled and shrill at the same time.  Quite an achievement- if something is going to be warm, rolled off, and muffled you'd at least expect it to be rich and smooth.  But the upper mids were shrill, and the mids were muffled and lacked detail.  The rest of the spectrum was nothing to write home about.  My ath-M50 are more comfortable, look better, are 1/3 the price, and sound better in every way, regardless of source. 

 

The one positive thing I can say is that they are very comfortable for supra-aural cans.  They way the pads sit on the outer edges of the ear, while the leather covers the ear spreads the weight nicely.  But my circum-aural m50 is more comfortable and isolates better and is not much bigger- smaller in fact since it folds up.

 

Keep in mind, I listened to these at the apple store.  I wouldn't have posted this review if they were open cans, but since they are fairly isolating, I didn't feel like that environment had much impact on my impressions.   I would buy these if you love how they look.  But if you are interested in sound quality, there are much cheaper alternatives that sound better, are also happily driven from ipods and isolate equally well or better.   ATH-M50, srh-840 and AKG K271 (if you like a bass light sound) are a few that come to mind. 

13 Comments

Worthless review... Please do not ever review something you listened to for five to ten minute at a store. Yet four people found this review useful.
There is no visible plastic on P5's. I agree - worthless review.
There was plastic on the ones I listened to. You're welcome to listen to crappy headphones if that's what you want to do. Maybe you should get some ultrasones
I would recommend you to visit Apple store again and test them one more time. P5's were never made with plastic outside.
I thought the same as your review when I brought it home to listen. I even considered returning it. However after around 50-100hrs of burn in it really does sounds amazing(ly better). If you can, please delete this "worthless" review because in my opinion you can't do a full review of a product from a store... plus no plastic. Monkey.
Clearly the demo at the Apple store had some hours on them. I don't think phones need to be burned in for hours to write a review. And I do not need days with a pair of headphones with such glaring flaws to hear them accurately. I can judge a pair of phones pretty well after just a minute or two and rarely does my opinion change.
Maybe you just can't hear very well.
You think you can judge a headphones pretty well after just a minute or two, and your opinion rarely changes. But stubbornness and self-assuredness are not virtues.
It has absolutely nothing to do with being stubborn, I am completely open minded, in fact more so than most people on this website. If I like how something sounds, I like it regardless of price and looks. I'm not susceptible to placebo. I have disliked countless expensive headphones and liked many cheap headphones. I am pretty confident in my hearing after 7 years buying and selling headphones and 3 years modifying orthodynamics, training my ears to hear problems, and fixing them. And further confident after seeing what I hear verified by objective measurements. I compare all headphones to my Mackie HR624 Reference Monitors, which sound better than pretty much any headphone ever made.
It does not take me very long to hear how a headphone sounds, the gross colorations most headphones have are there at first, and they are there later, and I hear them pretty quickly. There are sublte things that take a bit longer, but what I described in this post were not subtle. I rarely change my mind not out of principle, but simply because my opinion rarely changes. That's just how it is. I hear headphones well right away. It doesn't take me 635 hours of burn in and 6 weeks of brain burn in to realize there is a 5dB peak somewhere, or a problem with tonality or a resonance.
I am open to hearing another pair and if my impression is different, I'll change this review. Maybe the pair I heard was defective or a fake.
Welcome to the Completely Open-Minded Club. We may ridicule others who offer feedback and be resistant to changing a position, but our superior mental faculties justify all. Surely, to discourse with the local populace is demonstration of our benevolent nature.
YOU are the one attacking me. I'm not going to change my mind because some idiot with a goofy avatar thinks I should. Notice how the only people with something negative to say are idiot noobs. I will write reviews how I hear them and if you don't like it you can go somewhere else. This is my review. It is a reflection of my experience. If you have a different experience, write your own ******* review.
I side with open-mindedness and courtesy. I side with you, devils.
No, this is a good review..
Having read and read on the p5 and finally receiving it, my first impression was disappointing as well. FIRST IMPRESSIONS ARE IMPORTANT.
He said he was in the mac store, so what, they should be able to perform within that environment and he said to tk it with a grain of salt as it was off the cuff while waiting..
nevertheless, first impressions matter and upon owning them now I can tell he knows what he's talking about and I can tell he has a lot of genuine, real world experience.
I also agree with the bit about them being made to look higher quality than they are..I feel that also, and I really wanted to like these. I find them refined, but delicate...andB&W have said they were made withstyle conscious or fashion statement in mind..
I too feel a bit too much show and not enough go with these thus far..
Best regards
ps- so what he mafde a mistake regarding plastic on them...people are far to in love with the feel and look of these and it seems to blind them towards the mediocre sound.
Head-Fi.org › Head Gear › Headphones › Over-Ear › Bowers & Wilkins P5 Mobile Headphones › Reviews › rhythmdevils's Review