Pros: Excellent value, substantial sub-bass , non-fatiguing, neutral/accurate, folds for traveling
Cons: Pleather can get sweaty, rotating earcups annoying if you're not a DJ, soundstage could be bigger
The ATH-M50 is one of those rare products where the quality/price ratio really hits the sweet spot, and in fact is like a small miracle in the world of pro audio. When you get Grammy Award-winning audio engineers and producers like George Massenburg, Frank Filipetti, Al Schmitt...etc singing its praises publicly, you know it's got to be something special.
The M50 pulls off the difficult balance of being neutral, accurate, and detailed while not causing listening fatigue, and that is one of the most important things to get right when it comes to any audio device. If the device hurts your ears with shrill or piercing treble, then no matter how "detailed and revealing" you think it is, you won't be able to withstand the sonic torture anyway. Designed as professional studio monitors, the M50 can be used all day long without any listening fatigue, and it's tonal balance is accurate enough that many respected audio engineers would not hesitate to mix on them. Being sealed headphones, they also are a favorite among musicians and singers when recording, as they do not bleed into the microphone like open headphones (which means you also won't bother the people sitting near you, unlike open headphones where others will hear a tinny version of what you're hearing).
One of the most outstanding characteristics of the M50 is its sub-bass extension (50Hz and below), which is both deep and substantial. For those that don't know what full-sized loudspeakers with proper sub-bass extension sounds like, they might think the M50 is "bass heavy," but that would be incorrect. The extension and amount of bass rendered by the M50 is similar to what full-sized loudspeakers should sound like when the sub-bass is at a proper level. In fact, I would say headphones that have less sub-bass extension/level than the M50 should be categorized as "bass shy." The M50's bass is also punchy and visceral in a way that approximates full-sized loudspeakers, which is a very difficult thing to pull off for headphones.
The mids and the treble are smooth, and the treble never gets gratings like many other headphones. If I must nitpick, I might say that the treble has a tiny hint of metallic timbre when compared to open-back headphones. But it's a very vague impression and in no way gets in the way of the music, and it's only noticeable when doing extensive A/B comparisons. What I really love about the M50's upper mids and treble is that some songs can sound very shrill and fatiguing--especially on sharp snare hits or vocal sibilance--on other headphones that "fake" detail by raising a few to several dB's in those frequency ranges, but on the M50, those tracks sound perfect balanced and natural, never harsh and irritating.
The soundstage of the M50 is smaller than the average open-cans, because of its sealed design. This is perhaps the only thing sonically I wish it could be improved upon, but this does not mean the soundstage of the M50 is claustrophobic or in any way detrimental to the listening experience--it's simply not as open and lush as headphones like the Sennheiser HD6XX/5XX series (and other high quality open-cans).
Physically, the M50 is pretty comfortable to wear, but pleather tends to get a bit sweaty, and is a necessary evil for sealed-headphones. The rotating earcups are a bit annoying when taking the M50 on and off, since sometimes you have to rotate the earcups back into the correct orientation. For traveling, the M50 folds down to about half of its normal size, and that makes it very easy to travel with, not to mention more durable because it's harder to accidentally bend them or twist them out of shape. The overall look of the M50 has a pleasant, no-none-sense professional appeal--they really do look like they were designed to feel right at home in professional studios.
On a side note, the Sennheiser HD280 Pro is often recommended to musicians who need sealed-cans, and I highly suggest anyone considering a pair of nice sealed cans check out the M50, as they walk all over the HD280 in every single way possible, while still remaining very reasonably priced.




I really like how the reveiw sounds and the price
My overall budget was $400 max but i was suprised to see the price tag on this and how highly it is favored
I just plain and simple want to get the max out of these
What would be a good amplifier to add on and how to they work
Preferably a amp like $50-$100 range
I havent ever looked into amps but heard they help with sound quality
So if my numbers are waay off sorry
And one more thing
Hows the leakage.
1) Your audio interface/receiver/stereo/computer cannot actually output enough volume
2) Your audio interface/computer has really horrible sound quality, with audible distortion, lots of noise, and messed up frequency response. This is highly unlikely these days as D/A converters used in recent years are already far better than even the professional ones from ten or fifteen years ago. The truth is, today's cheap consumer D/A converters are plenty good enough, unless you have highly trained professional level understanding of audio fidelity or incredibly picky and are accustomed to really high-end audio products. Otherwise, even if you can hear any audible differences, they will be so minute that you'd wonder why the hell you spent the extra money on a dedicated amp.
Don't buy into the hype and the exaggerations that the community at large likes to perpetuate and promote. Be pragmatic in your purchases, and only spend the extra money when you are 100% sure you can hear clearly audible and compelling differences when doing critical comparison testing (ideally double-blind tests), otherwise it's mostly just placebo effect and your vanity playing tricks on you.