Head-Fi.org › Head Gear › Headphones › Over-Ear › Audio-Technica ATH-AD2000

Audio-Technica ATH-AD2000

100% Positive Reviews
Rated #147 in Over-Ear

Posted

Pros: Outstanding soul-stirring midrange, open and airy presentation, tight and fast bass, easily driven

Cons: Light on bass, slight treble roll off, soundstaging problems with many instruments, might be uncomfortable

When a headphone manufacturer releases a flagship, one would expect uncompromising sound quality, exceptional design and extreme comfort. As Audio Technica's current open circumaural top of the range model, the AD2000 comes off as a mixed bag. But it does have a big redeeming feature that has earned it a number of fans, and for this owner, it has charmed him enough to keep it together with the HD800.

 

It is the midrange which strikes the listener the most, it is a lush, forward midrange that suits female vocals to a T. Whether alto or soprano, Diana Krall or Kiri Te Kanawa, the AD2000 presents female vocals in a very intimate, soul-stirring manner. Female vocalists are not relegated to the back of the stage, they are right in front of you, baring every single emotion with stunning clarity. When Jane Monheit sings the last few lines of Over The Rainbow, one cannot help but feel for her as she pleads to the heavens. This kind of midrange may not be for everyone, some might find it "peaky" or "shouty", but those who enjoy it would be hard-pressed to find a more emotional midrange.

 

As the midrange takes center stage, bass and treble fall behind somewhat. This is a bass-light headphone, it may be deep, fast and snappy but it does not have the punch and volume to satisfy with rap, hip hop and R&B. This is definitely not a basshead's headphone. Treble has some slight roll-off, and while it still renders cymbals with gusto, it sounds a little flat when compared against a K701. Detail retrieval is above average, not as good as a K701 or DT880 but it is enough for most genres.

 

The soundstaging is an odd area; on the one hand it has a very open, airy presentation that feels like an open-air concert with plenty of space around instruments, on the other hand instrument separation suffers when faced with many instruments. On complex passages like Holst's Jupiter, some instruments sound as if they are blending together in a slightly incoherent blob. This is not much of a problem with mainstream music and jazz, and the above-average soundstage width is quite pleasing, if one is not too particular about depth.

 

With a dark blue colour scheme, hex grilles, "wings" on top and dual headbands, the AD2000 looks quite futuristic. The mesh grilles provide no isolation whatsoever, and there is a lot of sound leakage. Particularly annoying is the hard clamping pressure exerted by the headbands; when combined with the fairly thin earpads, one might find his ears squashed uncomfortably. Fortunately, stretching the headband and/or stuffing the earpads with cotton or a rubber hose can alleviate the comfort problem.

 

The AD2000 pairs well with many amps, and even sounds decent when going ampless. A personal favourite is the Rudistor NX-03, which makes the AD2000 sound very musical. Many portable amps like the Govibe Petite and Qables iQube drive it pretty well too. But OTL tube amps should not be used due to the low 40 ohms impedence.

 

As a flagship, the AD2000 does not stand up to the others in technical terms. But its midrange is capable of charming many with its soul-stirring presentation of female vocals. And after hearing many other capable headphones and owning an HD800, the AD2000 is an absolute keeper to me.

 

Sources: Cambridge Audio 840C/Stello DA100

Amps: Stello HP100/Qables iQube

Genres listened: Pop, Jpop, classical, instrumentals, jazz, trance, techno

Compared against: HD800, K701, K240 Sextett, ED8, PS-1000

Posted

Pros: Clarity, speed, overall tightness

Cons: slightly tight clamp

I have these, driven by a Ratoc mid-fi DAC/Amp (50.000 Yen), listening to FLAC 24/96 or upscaled 12/44.

 

I can compare them to the W1000X which I also purchased recently, to the AD900 and to the AD700. Most of my impressions AD900 are the review for those cans. 

 

I can say that the AD2000 are by far the best headphones I have listened to so far. They are not nearly as airy and whispery sounding as the AD900/AD700 but are very forward, aggressive and fast. As far as I can tell they are also superior in almost any aspect to the W1000X. It could be the strong clamp (which can be alleviated by bending them a bit, no harm done) but they just sound unbelievably tight, tight, tight!

 

I thought I could never understand the term of speed regarding headphones but these are really different. They don't share the sometimes piercing high frequency problems of the W1000X but stay very evenly loud along the frequencies. 

 

That being said I think their aggressiveness, while giving a very dynamic listeing experience, might be a little fatiguing for people who prefer a laid back sound. 

 

I think these cans excel at almost any genre but are particularly suited for electronic and classical music. Given their speed they might work very well for rock/metal as well. I think I would actually prefer the W1000X (equalized) for Jazz recordings as their sound is a lot more relaxed and laid back. I can not imagine myself listening uninterrupted for a long time with the AD2000. Also, having my ears touching the drivers is quite uncomfortable so I might upgrade these with some sort of mod or maybe even other pads.

Audio-Technica ATH-AD2000
Description:

Open Air Dynamic Headphones

Details:
DetailValue
Models:
Model Name/TypeMPNEAN/UPC
Start a guide on Audio-Technica ATH-AD2000!
Head-Fi.org › Head Gear › Headphones › Over-Ear › Audio-Technica ATH-AD2000