Head-Fi.org › Head Gear › Headphones › Over-Ear › AKG K812 › Reviews › jk47's Review

great for classical and jazz

A Review On: AKG K812

AKG K812

Rated # 91 in Over-Ear
See all 7 reviews
Recent Pricing:
Posted · 45436 Views · 4 Comments

Pros: spacious, good separation, natural and even across the spectrum

Cons: expensive

i've read a number of reviews around the net which criticize the k812's for harsh treble and limited bass - all i can say is that my experience with these 'phones does NOT bear that out. the bass criticisms appears to come from people who want to listen to dubstep. i don't know what dubstep is. the treble criticisms come from people who are listening to some types of pop music with which, again, i am not familiar.

i am using these phones sourced out of an ibasso dx90   i am listening ONLY to classical and jazz flac files, and the sound is wonderful.

for example, i spent time last night comparing 4 versions of schubert's "death and the maiden" - and the source and phones revealed significant differences among the performances. they revealed not only the obvious ones of tempo, phrasing, and expressiveness, but also differences in how the groups were miked and/or sound mixed/engineered.

the lindsays sounded as if they were recorded while playing in a warehouse, with an open, hollow and slightly distant tone, especially for the cello which sounded a little muffled or veiled. the alban berg quartet and the takacs had a better sound, very clean and present, while the melos recording made me feel like i was sitting amongst the players, and could feel the bows being drawn across the strings. the high notes in the andante movement were intense, expressive and clear- very much revealed by both the source and the headphones, without any sibilance or "tizziness."  in the melos version, the cello was rich and more present throughout in a way that i very much enjoyed.

i then spent an hour or two listening to jazz. charlie haden and pat methany's version of "first song (for ruth)" showed off haden's bass work. the bass notes were deep and rich, the sound of the strings being plucked very clear, while also being tightly controlled without any loose or blubbery sound. the piano on jacky terrason's "nardis" was very much present, not at all recessed or veiled, across the full spectrum of the instrument. some brazilian jazz-pop by maria rita carried the vocals forward. they were lively and caught her occasional slightly gutteral or raspy sounds.


through all the music, classical or jazz, the phones presented a spacious soundstage, with good separation of instruments, but with the size of the soundstage varying with the recording.  in the schubert, for example, the lindsays had a 180-210o wide soundstage, while the melos quartet was spread over only 120-150o.

bottom line: i'm very happy with these headphones.  i can't speak to their application for other forms of music, but for what i want to listen to, they're great.


edit- to add a note about comfort- i listened for several hours yesterday and there was no fatigue. they're extremely light and comfortable, so much so that i didn't even think to comment on it.


Great review, my dream AKG's. Do you happen to own Beyerdynamic T1's? 
no i don't, so i can't give you a comparison.  if the price is not TOO big a factor, let me recommend razordog's "open box" either through ebay or [for a bit more if you - like me- don't like using paypal] from razordog direct.  that's how i got mine, factory fresh.
Can you compare to any headphones?
I originally felt the HD800 to be balanced but after shopping around felt they were a bit light on the bass.
Though I think the biggest factor is the genres you listen to.
Classical / Jazz don't really need a strong, present, tight, thumping bass.
the only other high end headphone i have is the hd700.  i tried it on the dx90 and it was dull and lost all its soundstage, compared to driving it [hd700] from the heaphone out on my integrated amp [nad c375bee].  i realized later, however, that i only tried the on hd700 on the low gain setting of the dx90, and it probably would have benefitted from trying it on higher gain.   the k812 on ON THE DX90 compared to the hd700 ON THE INTEGRATED AMP [so different sources]: the hd700 had a deeper soundstage, although it wasn't all THAT deep.  the k812 ON THE DX90 has a big, but more of a two-dimensional stage- with great separation and  good "air" or space around each instrument.  both have really good, rich tone - but i didn't go back and forth to compare them.   the k812, with only 36ohms of impedance and good sensitivity are easy to drive with the dx90.  sorry i can't say more than that.  i agree that what music you listen to might make an enormous difference on how happy you are with any headphones, and that's why i was very specific about what i was playing.  
the k812 seems to be very even across the sound spectrum, with good representation of very high tones [on violin or piano, for instance] right down through the mids to very low tones [e.g. cello, bass, piano].   this evenness is great for what i want to listen to, but e.g. probably wouldn't satisfy a basshead.
Head-Fi.org › Head Gear › Headphones › Over-Ear › AKG K812 › Reviews › jk47's Review