Not necessarily. But would someone please direct me to the salient scientific posts, so I don't have to unduly suffer the concursive banter that comprises the bulk of this "objectivist/scientific" thread?
Have all the constituent materials been assayed?Until I see definitive results from a spectral analysis, et al, what is being passed off as "science" on this flame-throwers' dream thread is little more than the mumbo jumbo it [the thread] claims to be demystifying.
Maybe a bit of both. But no cheaper than the manifold salvos of cheap-shots already launched.I am surprised that Synegistic Research has not already weighed in on the dispute with a rational defense--or have they already(?)--I haven't read the entire thread yet.I may buy the test model, if the price is right! But I am also on the verge of buying a HOT on trial simply to gain some traction on this thread.
The tin-eared teckies have spoken . . . and spoken . . . and spoken . . .
Let us ignorant peons swoon in deference before these self-assured and self-described know-it-alls.
After all, the ART of listening is nothing more than "pure" SCIENCE, is it not?
Thank you for the input.
I bought my set through a dealer. They have agreed to handle the return/replacement, thank God.
I would like to try the Woo Wee sometime down the road with my Qinpu A-1.0X and the H-03.
Will try to call and have a replacement pair of the H-03 shipped.
Will try the headphones and amp out with another source/cables first, though.
When the H-03 are good, they are very very good.