or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by JMS

Which of Core Tech's tech will AKG be using? If it's the analyzers, does that mean it will interface with Windows?
It's good that PSB designs their products using scientific principles. I have heard many of PSB's headphones and speakers and their great neutral sound reflects that.   However, I must call out the fact that, in yet another interview, Mr. Barton speaks at length about all the published research that he has made use of, but carefully avoids giving even the slightest hint as to any of their own research directions and results.   Sure, PSB is a profit seeking company and...
They did mention the "TruNote" technology will appear in other headphones to come later this year.   I would guess the microphones can measure the person's specific ear canal resonance to compensate at high frequencies, and size and leakage of the enclosure formed between headphones and face to compensate at low frequencies.
At CES 2015 Harman announced their new AKG90Q, with an intriguing, perhaps revolutionary, feature:  Given the recent research Harman has been doing in headphone target frequency response curves, my guess is that the system will actively apply DSP to equalize the target response (to one of the target curves discussed in the papers) after canceling effects from external noise. Thereby both equalization and noise cancellation are handled in one process. I suspect the "two...
As an owner of the AV40's, I have to say: Get the JBL's, no matter if the AV40's were 80% off and you've already stolen your grandma's money. The Amazon page for the JBL's shows an excellent set of measurements. The AV40's don't sound as good as that.
What I learned from this experience is that both measurements and listening are required for a proper equalization. The measurements were telling me where the issues are and what to try to correct, but the listening told me how much correction to apply. I wouldn't have arrived at the same settings by listening alone, nor by measuring alone.
There's been some recent discussion over in the Sound Science forum about new research on the measured and subjective response of headphones, including a revelatory paper (summarized here) on the subjective impressions of equalized frequency responses.   I've been doing a bit of measurements and experimentation with various frequency response curves myself, and wanted to share the results because they have resulted in significant improvements to my Sennheiser HD650...
This is not too surprising. An audible difference could be caused by imperfections in the upsampling program, the computer's audio pipeline (which may process different bitrates differently), the DAC (ditto), or quantization errors with resampling (unlikely at 24-bit).   Given that upsampling algorithms cannot output more real info (rather than noise) than what it started with, if somehow it caused a subjective improvement, then it would be due to certain euphonic...
Couple more questions for Tonmeister:   You mentioned that channels were measured independently for the paper because comb filtering in the upper frequencies are ignored by our ears. However, that wouldn't apply to the 1-2khz stereo crosstalk dip, which accounts for an audible difference between loudspeaker and headphone listening. I would thus think RR1_G sounds "forward" like music normally is when played back on headphones. Have you considered accounting for...
Thanks for the helpful response. This answers my questions. Looking forward to the PPT. With regards to (2), I agree that without anchors and identical conditions the scores aren't directly comparable. Still, in your loudspeaker paper "Regression Model for Predicting Loudspeaker Preference", results from 13 separate tests were included. It was noted that it was not ideal to compare across tests, but there was still enough signal to derive a highly predictive model.
New Posts  All Forums: