Quote:
Originally Posted by imacguy
Do people really think the 595s are lackluster for their price? I have a pretty good ear and think they're pretty good, but I've never experienced anything higher myself. I'm...
Quote:
Originally Posted by JWahl
I think it may just be somewhat of a crap shoot as you say. I have the Rev. 1 with the ALO cable and I find the sound very good though lacking slightly little in soundstage...
Whatever, it is the headphone 650 lovers seem most comfortably crossing over to, and it's not like there's a lot of choice. Having sampled a lot of phones and read extensively on those I couldn't afford, I'm pretty sure that if the...
Quote:
Originally Posted by palchiu
How about this HP, it's stainless steel and bulletproof
http://final-audio-design.com/archives/1425
That looks suspiciously like...
Quote:
Originally Posted by fred43
Or is the music we listen to a deciding factor? I currently enjoy mostly complex rock and pop recordings. I would concede that the LCD-2 (rev 1) in it's stock form can sound...
Quote:
Originally Posted by sphinxvc
How about the "size" of the sonic image? A/B a T1 and LCD-2 and one thing that strikes you (aside from the T1s larger & more precise stage) is that the LCDs sonic...
Quote:
Originally Posted by purrin
My experience was the opposite. While I found the HD650 laid-back in the upper-mids and treble, I felt it was an extremely resolving headphone in terms of being able to extract...
Quote:
Originally Posted by olor1n
The HD650 is not a total let down after the LCD-2. IMHO it's the LCD-2 that's diminished when the HD650 is heard through a system that has good synergy with it. The Bifrost/Lyr...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kernmac
Many have stated that the LCD2 lacks soundstage, and although it isn't as vast as the T1 or K701, I find it fairly realistic and not congested at all. Detail and an...
