Quote:
Originally Posted by conquerator2
Come on though. As Jerg said, coming from a closed can, it really isnt easy to adjust.
But when you adjust, everything just gets...
Quote:
Originally Posted by jerg
Dude, go make your own thread about FR interpretation, don't come taint this thread with this. You've already been warned by 3 Head-Fi admins about it.
LOL,...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bboy500
Just got mine shipped....
But they came in a pretty messed up box with little rips all over, and they DEIFNTLEY don't look new to me.
Just got these from crutchfield for $389....
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardilla
That doesn't mean it is going to be harsh-sounding on the 339. It's regarded a good match. Send a pm to user Ultrainferno. He has the HE-500, 339 and other amps to...
Quote:
Originally Posted by SgtE
This is really interesting to me, as an owner of an OTL amp that can produce amazing amounts of volts but not amazing amounts of ampere.
To me, the...
Quote:
Originally Posted by ardilla
I think you are right on that one. However - it can be un-harsh and nice even when underpowered.
With regards to rev.1 vs rev.2 I think the...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tus-Chan
Well, if anything, I want to get a better DAC than an E7. I've got no use for a large portable amp (I'm of the opinion that, in real portable use in noisy environments, you're not...
Quote:
Originally Posted by vc1187
The HE-500 will only sound harsh if it is under-powered. For instance, I owned the Burson HA-160D prior to my current headphone amplifiers, and I did not like the HE-500....
Quote:
Originally Posted by SgtE
Thanks for your input.
I just spoke with a guy running a hifi-shop in Sweden, that sell he-500. I'm going to listen to the 339 + he-500 before making a move on the lcd-3.
And sorry...
Quote:
Originally Posted by SgtE
Yes, me too, that's why I would probably choose the lcd-3 over the lcd-2, because I love music more than my gear.
Haha, interesting interpretation! Still, I would rather spend...