No i am not a graph first guy. I've just been reading these things for a while and have noticed that with all the headphones I have owned/heard that the site where these graphs are from make perfect sense with exactly what I hear with...
I haven't heard the Paradox yet by the way but when I do I will post my comments here.
Just so you know how i feel about headphones..... No headphone I have heard (check my profile) has sounded as natural as good speakers yet so i am...
ahh yes accurate sounding instruments are usually described as having good timbre but when it all comes together then it becomes perfectly neutral and natural all at the same time like we hear things in real life
I never even knew there was an E1. FiiO please make a really good amp for audiophiles in the 300 dollar region that can kill the competitions 1000+ dollar amps. I know you can do it if you weren't afraid of the mafia LOL. Cmon the e9 is...
I owned the ad2000 before and i wouldn't say they were neutral since I found the upper mids/highs to be boosted like I see it on the graph is basically what I was getting at. I don't hear that kind of pronounced highs when I listen to...
Maybe you just got used to the inaccurate cans thinking they were accurate preproman. This reminds me of people thinking k701s are neutral. Anyways here are some graphs to compare the Paradox(top pic) and the AD2000...