or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Sweden

Some oldskool headphone listening from Japan.
I've had two pairs of FXD70 and they are very close in sound to the FXD80. The bass on the FXD70 had a little more impact and the sound was more coherent, with the FXD80 having more air in the treble.  I have noticed a difference in sound quality between the two FXD70. One sound a bit more grainy in the treble with a smaller soundstage. One theory besides 'burn in' and product variance would be earwax getting in the nozzle filter and acting as another filter. The FXDs...
 If you heard of Vaseline you know about petroleum jelly. Or scented petroleum jelly.. Oops second of the ball there. My bad.
 Not at all. They are just like new, but I'm very careful with my expensive stuff. Personally I feel they where designed for an over the ear fit. The distance between the splitter and the earphones are perfect for an over-ear fit for example. At least in my case.
No one with a pair of Dita who can share their thoughts?
I would love to try this program with TakeT. I have a feeling they could be a match made in heaven just like with the HD800.
Great feedback. It's not that it's soft like it has little impact like it can be with some tube amps, it's more of a boomy quality. Still I prefer slightly boomy and authoritarian than light and limp. I want to feel the power of a 18th century organ playing Xerxes by Handel than just only hearing it. 
JVC FXD70 is the best I've heard at imaging under 100. Better than RE-400 for sure. It has this razor sharpness to it sound not many cheap in-ears have.
Anyone know if it's possible to Isone with a smart phone?
 I never could get Isone to sound right with any Audeze, unless I put distance at 0 and used it more as a crossfeed. It just messed up tonality too much and degraded the sound for some reason.The HD800 is another story. I can't even imagining listening to the HD800 ever again without this program.
New Posts  All Forums: