New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by alphaman

Nice job on your amp. CCS with tube can stress filaments if not carefully done. I assume you are using something like: http://www.cavalliaudio.com/diy/soha%20ii/main.php?page=design/opdesign
Dunno if this has been mentioned ... if you're using LO, setting vol. at one or two steps below MAX seems to give best results. Not sure why: for external amp, using its vol. at higher levels may be the reason. Something about greater "linearity" when analog volume is used at higher level. Then again, the reason I hear improvement may be something intrinsic to the CS4398 DAC (or the way it drives the opa's that follow). Anyway, try it yourself ... extended listening...
For me, the small (stock) Comply have best seal and are most comfortable. And the small Comply least deform the natural geometry of my ear canal. But still, for most sonic attributes that are important to me, the Comply are WAY eclipsed by the stock silicone bi-flange. Reasons for this may be shorter/wider inner diameter of these tips. Another reason may very well be that (due to their shape/larger size) the silicone bi-flanges "distort" the geometry of my ear canal in a...
Not sure I consider this model -- my only experience with ES -- to be less reliable/durable than usual. My Senn IE-8 had BOTH nozzles "break" only a few mos. into use. Not really broken -- the bayonet-style I-E8 nozzle have a weird soda-bottle-cap-type low-torque break seal. They will still lock-fit, but they twist out of position easily, often leaving the tip+nozzle in ear canal!  I have the same tip-in-canal issue with SM3, etc. Welcome to the world of high-end IEMs,...
Can you better define "broke"? Mine "broke" too -- shell came apart where the two halves are "glued" together. I attended to it immediately by re-gluing the halves back together. So, nothing really broke ... just poor "glue job" with stock unit!
Anyone have a graph with the in-line filter removed?
Usually, I use the small supplied gray double-flange tips. Today, however I listened to my FILTERLESS SM3v2 with the supplied Comply foam tips.  This is the first time I've done so since removing the in-line filters (see my comments on that earlier in this thread -- bottom line: filter removal is a HUGE improvement). Anyway, IMO, the Comply are big step back in most aspects of SQ. No wonder I haven't used them in a while! QUESTIONS: (sorry I'm too lazy to search...
Just wanted to add... I have a some older bd velour pads from early 1990s model DT911 that fit 880s. Tho' there are minor diffs in material and design, they sound similar to modern velour pads. 
Given that one only powers this device with pure DC (i.e batts. only), anyone know the usable lifetime of the electrolytic caps used? The rated lifespan of electros is not that spectacular (a few K hrs). You may have noted some of the better computer motherboards touting use of "Japanese solid caps". These are also electros but not as "leaky"...so longer...
Hmmm ... probably velour when they are new + clean. But as they age with sweat and skin oils and other yuckies, they begin to feel v. nasty against bare skin. I suspect that leather/plastic are better in this respect as they stay cleaner (and are easier to clean). 
New Posts  All Forums: