New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by Lan647

  I was bored!
Quote: Originally Posted by preproman      HUH??         Like I said, some will disagree. The crispness and "detail" of the HD 800 is a result of the...
Quote: Originally Posted by OPR8R  Just out of curiosity, what amp did you use with the HD800?  The same amp you're using with your LCD-2?   Yep!
Quote: Originally Posted by Xero  Isn't the HD800 one of the most revealing headphones out there? Would you be able go back to the HD800 and hear the crackle if you're looking for it?   I know some...
Quote: Originally Posted by SP Wild  I remember when I first got the LCD2's, I thought I'd made a mistake with purchasing from an unknown company.  I heard these distortions, pops and crackles on the...
Quote: Originally Posted by paradoxper  I don't think you need to discredit RustA's findings. He just said the LCD-2's don't offer all the information, they're just not as resolving. The same goes for the HD800...
Quote: Originally Posted by RustA    Interesting... I've extensively compared both side by side and LCD-2 simply lacked microdetail and their treble was too shelved down to offer me all information stored...
Quote: Originally Posted by knights  How can a headphone with less retrieval of details be more transparent than the 800? Im sorry if we use the term "transparency" differently… LCD2 is no question a great can but its...
I don't find the HD 800 more detailed than the LCD-2. The HD 800 gives the initial impression of great detail retrieval/resolution by boosting the treble. The LCD-2 let's you hear details through transparency. 
Quote: Originally Posted by fountainpenman  what is the comparison to the hd 800? is it that big if you dont have an amp?   I prefer the Momentum, taken you don't use a carefully matched tube amp to...
New Posts  All Forums: