Has anyone compared the UE6000 to the M100? Both look good on paper, I've heard the UE6000 but not the M100. How do they compare for sub bass? A few opinions here would be nice.
Thanks in advance guys.
Quote:Originally Posted by Mshenay Yea i wants em. Need to find a seller here n get the pads swapped what pads r u using bte
Also graphs r usless unless uve heard the can, so don't bring one up without having listened
But ya... I...
I would normally second the T70 in this case, however if you already love the 990 sound and dont want to spurge on the T70s consider the 770s. They have the treble spike, boosted bass and dip in the area where the ear is quit...
Pro 900 has a sharp treble spike (this makes electronic stuff too bright) and much higher than average distortion down low. If you are looking for "fast" bass (bump likely between 80hz and 200hz) consider the Q40 or if a bit...
The XB1000 have to bumps in areas that are known to be quite fatiguing. The bass output is subjectively AND objectively less than the XB500 and XB700. I highly suggest you compare them side by side. I hope this helps....
Quote:Originally Posted by Dubstep Girl i don't think the 770 pro have very good sub-bass, they can go pretty deep, but eventually roll off, and can struggle with really deep bass.
the denons have much more control, with the d2000...
Quote:Originally Posted by jerg Fact of the matter is, non-orthos WILL have more sub-bass presence, simply because they all have massive sub-50Hz harmonic distortion (most of what you hear in the sub-bass is just...
Ue6000 are not v shaped at all (active makes a bit of a v). They are a pretty easy to listen to, forgiving can. I really considered these but wished for a bit more sub bass. (still looking for a warm can with lots of sub...