or Connect
New Posts  All Forums:

Posts by monoglycer

Also Charliex... this might be of interest to you as well. http://www.head-fi.org/t/442102/fake-esw10-pictures-vs-real-56k-warning
  I think you may be onto something here for me...I found them incredibly boring but I will keep what you have said in mind...might be why I was never enamored by stax...
I think I found your next upgrade charliex...   http://www.head-fi.org/t/622166/fs-sennheiser-orpheus-he90-hev90-singlepower-es2
Great meet as always Pavel! Look forward to the next one.
Having owned both, the FXT90 is superior to the 215s in all aspects of sound quality. The FXT90 might not reach as low in the bass but makes up for it by having treble.
sorry for being blunt...but you want to upgrade from the atrios and want serious sub bass from the IEMs you choose.....do you even read the reviews linked to you?
I think you need to hear it before coming to any conclusions, sound is always subjective, and descriptions and graphs can only go so far.
I'm not sure if its something with the new production or anything, but my FXT-90s have extended treble, but the highs are in no way harsh/piercing/painful in anyway, and I am sensitive to sibilance.
I will be down for this epic sushi on the one condition that we get pavel to try out some alcohol...   I actually didn't try out too many new headphones for the fear of wanting to upgrade.   That being said, the Q701s were nice, especially paired with that amp. However I still prefer the K601s for my own personal music tastes.   The DT1350 were spectacular at what they did, great comfort and surprising isolation, sound was pretty good too out of my...
New Posts  All Forums: