Posts by Dan Lavry

Quote: Originally Posted by bubba67 Where is the DA11 available for purchase right now - the online Lavry store is OOS. Thank you for the note. We ran out of DA11 and the online store stated "out of...

-So dear Dan: For Lavry da12: Please supply remote with abillity to switch between inputs[/QUOTE] Hi, Thanks for your feedback. Regards Dan Lavry

Quote: Originally Posted by Cortes I've been told that the Headphone output of DA10 produces almost idential signal to the XLR outputs. My question to you is if that's is true. Thanks. The information is on...

Quote: Originally Posted by nick_charles ...Nobody is disputing the objective damaging effects of jitter , the big question is how bad does it have to be before we can actually hear it. I need to spend less time...

Quote: Originally Posted by jcx I believe he lost track of the context - 250 nS jitter is only ~1% of the 44.1 sample time - which is where this jitter # applies - not at SPDIF bit edges the only limit on digital...

Quote: Originally Posted by gevorg Are you following this thread, or just me? Since your confusion sounds sincere, I'll clarify it for you: In post #286, Dan made a very interesting statement that "DA jitter...

Quote: Originally Posted by jkeny Dan, if you really to advance understanding of this topic then make some posts that explain how my summary is wrong. Otherwise, I think we can all leave this be! I already...

Quote: Originally Posted by b0dhi The question seems to be: - is it more effective to use short cable lengths and attempt to minimise the reflections before the point of detection at the receiver, or use long cable...

Quote: Originally Posted by jkeny This is one area where I believe Mr. Lavry is wrong - reflections are caused by impedance mismatches usually at both ends of the cable (where transmitter & receiver reside) so BOTH...

Quote: Originally Posted by nick_charles Er, you have it wrong again ! Benjamin and Gannon (AES paper) used correlated jitter (the worst kind) at different frequencies (2k, 5K and 17K) and thus had lower thresholds ~...