![]() |
|
|
|||
|
I thought this place would be the best place to ask on the difference between the x5 and the x10 model.
What is the difference in the sound signature between the two? I've heard that x10 was just like x5 with extra base and smaller size, but I've recently been reading that they use different drivers and actually sound differently. Also, are these dual drivers or single drivers? Thank you |
|
|||
|
Both the X10 and X5 are single armature drivers. I have the X5 coming tomorrow and will be able to comment on the sound quality. I tried the X10 a while back so any comparisons will be by memory.
|
|
||||
|
So, ajmiarka, whaddaya think of the X5? I too had the X10 at one point, and despite their overall buttery-smooth, warm signature, I found they were a bit too harsh with the sibilants in my recordings to hold onto. Any chance you can comment on how your X5 handles sibilance vs. the X10? My presumption is that the X5's focus on treble would, if anything, exacerbate the problem -- but then again, a clearer treble can also translate to a better-behaved one...
__________________
musicophile / euphonophile team porta-fi / team exo-amplessness / team self-defeating bargain junkies // feedback //
|
|
|||
|
For my brief time with the X5s, I can say that the mids/highs are much clearer than the X10s. To me, the bass on the X10s hid a lot of the mid and high sounds. I was happy with the amount of bass on the X5s though, and comfort was not an issue, even though the "barrel" is bigger than the X10. You should not have an issue getting them into your ears.
![]() As for sibilance, I'm not quite sure what that is...from Webster's definition, it would be the harsh sounds coming from the voice on a recording? I did not have an issue with this with the X5. Voices sounded great. In the end, I returned the X5s, but that's because I got an awesome deal on some SE530s that I couldn't pass up. If I had a choice again between the X10s and the X5s, I would pick the X5s. The price point is cheaper and I feel you get a better sound that isn't drowned out by the bass of the X10s. Hope this helps. I'm not really good at explaining the technical parts of what I hear. Need to work on that. Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Thanks for the reply, ajmiarka! Sibilance (in recording terms) is indeed a harshness present in some vocals, particularly with "s" and "ch" and "sh" and "c" types of sounds that can spike several dB higher than the rest of the recording. One's level of tolerance to it is a very personal thing; me, I can't stand the stuff.
__________________
musicophile / euphonophile team porta-fi / team exo-amplessness / team self-defeating bargain junkies // feedback //
|
|
||||
|
bump for more comment
__________________
[FONT="Century Gothic"][COLOR="SeaGreen"]feedback: http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showth...light=misterdx |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| x5(30gb) vs x5(60gb) vs zune(80gb) | Ub3rMario | Portable Source Gear | 8 | 07-25-2008 08:09 AM |
| X5 and iPod G5 audio quality comparison | immtbiker | Portable Source Gear | 71 | 01-05-2006 04:05 PM |
| X5 - X5L Comparison Photo's ? | Melik | Portable Source Gear | 4 | 10-19-2005 03:18 PM |
| X5 Insides (operation x5 insidation) | Jakets | Portable Source Gear | 0 | 06-13-2005 03:56 AM |
| X10-D...Favorite New Tweak!! | elrod-tom | Cables, Power, Tweaks, Speakers, Accessories (DBT-Free Forum) | 6 | 08-18-2002 05:30 PM |