Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio  
You are in Klipsch's Premier Sponsor Forum at Head-Fi.org.
To get back to Head-Fi.org's Main Forums, click here.

Go Back   Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio > Premier Sponsor Forums and Sponsor Forums > Klipsch Premier Sponsor Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2008, 10:03 PM
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 713
Default Comparison between the x5 and the x10

I thought this place would be the best place to ask on the difference between the x5 and the x10 model.

What is the difference in the sound signature between the two? I've heard that x10 was just like x5 with extra base and smaller size, but I've recently been reading that they use different drivers and actually sound differently.

Also, are these dual drivers or single drivers?

Thank you
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2008, 11:47 PM
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 306
Default

Both the X10 and X5 are single armature drivers. I have the X5 coming tomorrow and will be able to comment on the sound quality. I tried the X10 a while back so any comparisons will be by memory.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-29-2008, 09:37 PM
epithetless's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Boston, Mass
Posts: 1,648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmiarka View Post
I have the X5 coming tomorrow and will be able to comment on the sound quality. I tried the X10 a while back so any comparisons will be by memory.
So, ajmiarka, whaddaya think of the X5? I too had the X10 at one point, and despite their overall buttery-smooth, warm signature, I found they were a bit too harsh with the sibilants in my recordings to hold onto. Any chance you can comment on how your X5 handles sibilance vs. the X10? My presumption is that the X5's focus on treble would, if anything, exacerbate the problem -- but then again, a clearer treble can also translate to a better-behaved one...
__________________
musicophile / euphonophile
team porta-fi / team exo-amplessness / team self-defeating bargain junkies

// feedback //
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2008, 12:16 PM
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 306
Default

For my brief time with the X5s, I can say that the mids/highs are much clearer than the X10s. To me, the bass on the X10s hid a lot of the mid and high sounds. I was happy with the amount of bass on the X5s though, and comfort was not an issue, even though the "barrel" is bigger than the X10. You should not have an issue getting them into your ears.

As for sibilance, I'm not quite sure what that is...from Webster's definition, it would be the harsh sounds coming from the voice on a recording? I did not have an issue with this with the X5. Voices sounded great.

In the end, I returned the X5s, but that's because I got an awesome deal on some SE530s that I couldn't pass up. If I had a choice again between the X10s and the X5s, I would pick the X5s. The price point is cheaper and I feel you get a better sound that isn't drowned out by the bass of the X10s.

Hope this helps. I'm not really good at explaining the technical parts of what I hear. Need to work on that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by epithetless View Post
So, ajmiarka, whaddaya think of the X5? I too had the X10 at one point, and despite their overall buttery-smooth, warm signature, I found they were a bit too harsh with the sibilants in my recordings to hold onto. Any chance you can comment on how your X5 handles sibilance vs. the X10? My presumption is that the X5's focus on treble would, if anything, exacerbate the problem -- but then again, a clearer treble can also translate to a better-behaved one...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2008, 01:04 AM
epithetless's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Boston, Mass
Posts: 1,648
Default

Thanks for the reply, ajmiarka! Sibilance (in recording terms) is indeed a harshness present in some vocals, particularly with "s" and "ch" and "sh" and "c" types of sounds that can spike several dB higher than the rest of the recording. One's level of tolerance to it is a very personal thing; me, I can't stand the stuff.
__________________
musicophile / euphonophile
team porta-fi / team exo-amplessness / team self-defeating bargain junkies

// feedback //
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008, 08:08 AM
ADD's Avatar
ADD ADD is offline
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 784
Default

Hi,

I thought I would add my observations, having tried both the X5 and X10. Firstly, I found the X5 to be far more comfortable than the X10, even with the biflange tips poked deep into my ear. It seems the reason for this is that with the X10, the "tail" made contact with part of my external ear, creating a sort of "pressure point" that radiated pain in the ear area and surrounding parts of the head. With the X5, the tail is long enough such that it does not touch any part of my external ear. Very comfortable indeed.

I did not like the sound of the X5 at all, but I loved the sound of the X10. To me the X5 sounded gutless, opaque and lacking in dynamics. I did not find it any clearer than the X10 - infact I found precisely the opposite. I also thought that contrary to other opinions, the X10 had significant top end resolution, extension and transparency, though I still think is the X10's only sonic weak point.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-16-2008, 02:26 AM
misterDX's Avatar
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 575
Default

bump for more comment
__________________
[FONT="Century Gothic"][COLOR="SeaGreen"]feedback: http://www.head-fi.org/forums/showth...light=misterdx
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
x5(30gb) vs x5(60gb) vs zune(80gb) Ub3rMario Portable Source Gear 8 07-25-2008 08:09 AM
X5 and iPod G5 audio quality comparison immtbiker Portable Source Gear 71 01-05-2006 04:05 PM
X5 - X5L Comparison Photo's ? Melik Portable Source Gear 4 10-19-2005 03:18 PM
X5 Insides (operation x5 insidation) Jakets Portable Source Gear 0 06-13-2005 03:56 AM
X10-D...Favorite New Tweak!! elrod-tom Cables, Power, Tweaks, Speakers, Accessories (DBT-Free Forum) 6 08-18-2002 05:30 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Head-Fi.org