Support Head-Fi.org by
starting all of your
Amazon.com shopping by
clicking here.
____________________________________________________________________
Today's Featured Head-Fi Blog: Jude's Blog
____________________________________________________________________
Please help
support Head-Fi by becoming a Contributing Member
CLICK
HERE -- Contributing Members, thank you
for your generous support! --
Headphoneus Supremus: Founder of the Head-Fi Pay-to-Post Program.
Originally Posted by dj_mocok
The high ISO performance is impressive. they look like ISO800 from my D80.
That was probably the biggest selling point for me. My dad was going to sell me his used D80, but the wife and I decided to go with the D300. The LiveView, lens calibration, and overall performance are simply incredible. Now I can't wait to take it back to DisneyLand and California Adventure during the daytime to see how ISO200 performs!
__________________
"...If anyone thinks he knows something, he has not yet learned it as he ought to know it."
Headphoneus Supremus: Founder of the Head-Fi Pay-to-Post Program.
Originally Posted by bigshot
Here's some similar shots where I had the ISO pegged on my D200...
See ya
Steve
Steve,
Did you use your 18-200 VR for those shots? I was looking over the funzoneatm shot and am amazed that the atm sign in the foreground and the ferris wheel in the far background are all in focus. Where were these shots taken?
__________________
"...If anyone thinks he knows something, he has not yet learned it as he ought to know it."
Well thanks to our good ol' pal craigslist, I just scored a new D200/18-200 outfit for ridiculously cheap. The D200 is just a damn joy to use. I mean, I've checked it out in stores before, but nothing really compares to really putting it to use. It really does make my D70S seem rather like a toy, or in headphone terms, it's like I've gone from an SR60 to an HD650.
I'm conflicted over whether or not to keep the lens. On one hand, it's supposedly the most convenient thing ever, the ultimate jack of all trades (and VR is pretty damn cool). On the other hand, I wonder if the vast majority of the pics I take (landscape, and indoor medium/low light) wouldn't be better looking with a Tokina 12-24 and Nikkor 35 F/2.
I'm conflicted over whether or not to keep the lens. On one hand, it's supposedly the most convenient thing ever, the ultimate jack of all trades (and VR is pretty damn cool). On the other hand, I wonder if the vast majority of the pics I take (landscape, and indoor medium/low light) wouldn't be better looking with a Tokina 12-24 and Nikkor 35 F/2.
Indoor medium/low light is a tough one for this lens, especially if you have moving subjects. For that you'll want a faster lens for sure.
Not sure how often you will be filming between 12-17mm, but if not often then you may find it gives you nice landscape shots. Give it a try and let us know how it goes. Oh, and lucky you, getting a D200. If I had more spare money I would seriously consider a D200/300...... but alas.....