Support Head-Fi.org by
starting all of your
Amazon.com shopping by
clicking here.
____________________________________________________________________
Today's Featured Head-Fi Blog: A Japanese headfier's monologue (Sasaki)
____________________________________________________________________
Please help
support Head-Fi by becoming a Contributing Member
CLICK
HERE -- Contributing Members, thank you
for your generous support! --
lossy compression from the sensor and lossless from the sensor are very unlike audio where we really say we can hear a difference and most cannot. raw and jpeg offer from a distance still, very visually different images. often the jpeg looks a bit more vibrant though as it loses tones in compression and retains the most bright ones only.
raw however has all the dark details that jpeg throws away and fine lines of colour that hide between every shade. it is quite stunning actually. but i shoot jpeg mostly.
Is there a quality difference between RAW and JPEG? Some, but it gets smaller and smaller with each generation of cameras. I can't tell much of a difference unless I'm intentionally underexposing with my D50. At the end of the day, the fact that I don't have to spend 1-15 minutes on each and every shot I take is more than worth the tiny difference RAW gives. I shoot JPEG exclusively unless I know I absolutely need the full dynamic range.
__________________ Home: Chaintech AV-710, Sony SCD-CE595 -> Yamaha RX-V559 Receiver ->Grado RS-1 #863, B&W 685 Grado Pad Inventory:Bowls (90%), Flats (10%) Headphile C-Pads Ported Flat (0%) Portable: 160GB iPod Classic -> Koss KSC-75, Etymotic ER-6i Loaned off to others: Sennheiser HD-280 Team "Sennheiser Users Who Have Seen The Light" Head-Fi Feedback
Headphoneus Supremus Landscape-Photo-Fi Organizer for Can Jam '09
In instances where image quality is paramount, I wouldn't go back to using JPEG. RAW just provides so much more leeway to massage the image just the way I want it, rather than relying on the camera's best guess. I only use RAW in instances where image quality is secondary to just getting the shot, and I'd have a lot of shots to process (like at a headphone meet, for instance).
I shoot JPEG exclusively unless I know I absolutely need the full dynamic range.
On the current generation of Nikon cameras, the Adaptive Dynamic Range feature isn't available in RAW format... only jpeg. From the rave reviews on how this feature works I've read, it seems to be a good reason to shoot JPEG instead of RAW.
Quick question about film Nikon SLR guys, you know if I want to just test a lens with a film SLR (to see if the lens is broken or not), can I just attach it to a film SLR and operate the lens (the AF) without a film inserted in the camera (blank)?