The NIKON Thread (Talk About Nikon Stuff here)

[Arainach]

Originally Posted by Towert7

Nikon | Wide Angle 35mm f/1.4 AIS Manual Focus Lens | 1429 | B&H
Still made brand new today.
Manual Focus though.

Unfortunately, the 35 f/1.4 is mostly crap until stopped down to f/4 or so.

[Towert7]

Originally Posted by Arainach

Unfortunately, the 35 f/1.4 is mostly crap until stopped down to f/4 or so.

As I may buy this in the future, I'm curious as to what you say.
Did you used to (or still do) own this lens, or is this the consensus from others?

[Towert7]

Actually, I'm looking at the flickr group for this lens, and the pictures I've seen at F/1.4 look beautiful!
This for example:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rodluva...-90672466@N00/
or this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mambolo...pool-nikkor35s
These are amazing!

So now you have me interested. What about it is crappy?

[Poohblah]

Originally Posted by screwdriver

there is a sigma 30mm 1.4 right? im not sure about the image quality but most primes usually are good anyways.

eh, i would stay away from it. it's a sigma prime. these days zooms tend to be about as good as primes.

i didn't know the 35mm f/1.4 AI-S was still made. i know they still make 50mm f/1.2 AI-S lenses though.

[Arainach]

Originally Posted by Towert7

As I may buy this in the future, I'm curious as to what you say.
Did you used to (or still do) own this lens, or is this the consensus from others?

I've only used one briefly for a few shots, which when taken at f/1.4 seemed a bit dull in color but otherwise good. Most other reviews I've read have stated something to the effect of "dull colors and softness at f/1.4, better color but still some center softness and pronounced edge softness at f/2, good color and center but still edge softness at f/2.8, excellent at f/4. I wouldn't mind more time with the lens to try and confirm this myself, but suffice to say it's no 28 f/1.4 or 50 f/1.4 it would seem, unfortunately.

[Towert7]

Originally Posted by Arainach

I've only used one briefly for a few shots, which when taken at f/1.4 seemed a bit dull in color but otherwise good. Most other reviews I've read have stated something to the effect of "dull colors and softness at f/1.4, better color but still some center softness and pronounced edge softness at f/2, good color and center but still edge softness at f/2.8, excellent at f/4. I wouldn't mind more time with the lens to try and confirm this myself, but suffice to say it's no 28 f/1.4 or 50 f/1.4 it would seem, unfortunately.

I see. Thanks for the info.

[Repooc]

Sweet, I didn't know threads like this existed in this forum.

I just wanted to chime in because I'm a D80 user as well.

Can't wait until the D90 specs are released. I MAY contimplate doing the upgrade. Time will tell though.

(28 more posts to go)

[Hayduke]

Originally Posted by Repooc

(28 more posts to go)

for what? until you buy a new camera? what are you waiting for!?!?!?! hehe

[Poohblah]

Originally Posted by Repooc

Sweet, I didn't know threads like this existed in this forum.

I just wanted to chime in because I'm a D80 user as well.

Can't wait until the D90 specs are released. I MAY contimplate doing the upgrade. Time will tell though.

(28 more posts to go)

the D90 won't be much of an upgrade from the D80.
a D200 or D300 will be a much bigger step up, and right now D200's are cheap as chips.

[Repooc]

yeah, I only picked up my D80 last december... I just like to eye the new products.

But for sure... if I were serious about upgrading. It would be a tough call between the D700 and D300 for me.

A buddy of mine just went from the D80 to the D300 last year as well.

(10 more posts to go)