Support Head-Fi.org by
starting all of your
Amazon.com shopping by
clicking here.
____________________________________________________________________
Today's Featured Head-Fi Blog: A Japanese headfier's monologue (Sasaki)
____________________________________________________________________
Please help
support Head-Fi by becoming a Contributing Member
CLICK
HERE -- Contributing Members, thank you
for your generous support! --
My guess:
If it has an FX sensor, 1800$us.
If it has a DX sensor, 1000$us.
Of course, it's always hard to get new bodies the first couple of months after their release.
i'm guessing it will have a DX sensor...but with all these video features, etc., you think it will be "only" $1000? i've held off on grabbing the d300...though a step below the d300, the d90 would be more commensurate with my skill level and uses, methinks.
__________________
see profile for equipment
feedback: Head-Fi; ebaY
for sale: wanted:
I'm just trying to understand why I would want to buy a Nikon instead of Canon (or maybe Olympus).
Ken Rockwell points out on his site that Nikon's are designed for quick shots using automatic settings- the sorts of things news and adventure type photographers need; while the Canon is set up for more static sorts of photography where you have the time to tweak your settings and go for the ultimate image quality.
My point and shoot is an Olympus and my DSLR is a Nikon. But I'm sure I would have been just as happy with Canon. There are a lot of great cameras. The best reason to buy one over another is if you already have lenses.
Ken Rockwell points out on his site that Nikon's are designed for quick shots using automatic settings- the sorts of things news and adventure type photographers need; while the Canon is set up for more static sorts of photography where you have the time to tweak your settings and go for the ultimate image quality.
My point and shoot is an Olympus and my DSLR is a Nikon. But I'm sure I would have been just as happy with Canon. There are a lot of great cameras. The best reason to buy one over another is if you already have lenses.
See ya
Steve
The D300 was on the top of my wishlist (well, other than the D3, and now the D700), but was simply out of my budget. I went first with a Canon XSi and then switched that out for a Canon 40D. I love the 40D, and have many basics still to learn about composition and camera, but can't deny that I still drool at the thought of the D300 (and D700).
Some cat at the Highland Games was shooting next to me with a D3 this past weekend, and I was probably staring more at his camera than taking photos with mine. LOL.
Ken Rockwell points out on his site that Nikon's are designed for quick shots using automatic settings- the sorts of things news and adventure type photographers need; while the Canon is set up for more static sorts of photography where you have the time to tweak your settings and go for the ultimate image quality.
Ken Rockwell points out on his site that Nikon's are designed for quick shots using automatic settings- the sorts of things news and adventure type photographers need; while the Canon is set up for more static sorts of photography where you have the time to tweak your settings and go for the ultimate image quality.
My point and shoot is an Olympus and my DSLR is a Nikon. But I'm sure I would have been just as happy with Canon. There are a lot of great cameras. The best reason to buy one over another is if you already have lenses.
See ya
Steve
Thanks for the response! I'll have to lookup his site. Never heard of him :P
I have a couple lenses for my Canon 35mm SLR, but I don't think they are anything special. Certainly not enough to influence a brand decision. It has a 50mm (probly kit lens) and a big zoom that I always thought took mediocre pictures, but that could have been me :P
Originally Posted by jude
The D300 was on the top of my wishlist (well, other than the D3, and now the D700), but was simply out of my budget. I went first with a Canon XSi and then switched that out for a Canon 40D. I love the 40D, and have many basics still to learn about composition and camera, but can't deny that I still drool at the thought of the D300 (and D700).
Some cat at the Highland Games was shooting next to me with a D3 this past weekend, and I was probably staring more at his camera than taking photos with mine. LOL.
So you had the XSi and like the 40D better? Right now, the XSi is at the top of my list, but I don't plan to buy anything for a couple months, so that will likely change
Originally Posted by GTRacer
Ken Rockwell is lying. That simply isn't true.
So then why should I buy a Nikon?
I've heard it's because they have the best optics, but it seems to me that the high end lenses from other brands are as good or better. The other good reason I've heard to get a Nikon is the availability of rental gear. So I would have a better chance of being able to rent a lens for a special occasion. Nobody where I live rents camera equipment (at least that I have been able to find).
__________________
PC(FLACs and Foobar2k) --> Sennheiser HD-580
MiniMod or 30GB Video --> FreqShow
The same reason why you should buy into any camera system - their ergonomics and lens line-up. Nikon have hundreds of lenses available for their F-mount and the ergonomics are simply top notch.
Headphoneus Supremus: Videographus Supremus: Makes audio cables using super-advanced materials, like "some clear tape" and "some not so clear tape."
Originally Posted by GTRacer
Ken Rockwell is lying. That simply isn't true.
It is true in my opinion also. Nikon's better metering, better flash, auto-iso = better auto camera.
Hayduke,
If you take a look at specs, it doesn't actually mean anything. The performance of the camera depends on your ability to push yourself and it to the limits and your own personal take on what's "good".
Do you know your photographic intentions? That can dictate what tools you should use.
__________________
lan's Head-Fi International Meet 2008 "CanJam" High Definition Videos! are here
lan's Head-Fi Meet 2007.Nov.10 High Definition Videos! are here
lan's Head-Fi International Meet 2006 High Definition Videos! are here
My advice to you:
- Use your own ears as everybody's hearing and preferences are different.
- Try to audition as much equipment as possible to find your sound.
- Buy used to save money.
My guess:
If it has an FX sensor, 1800$us.
If it has a DX sensor, 1000$us.
I'm thinking it will be a DX sensor, but would love it if it were a FX sensor.
Both Canon and Nikon are going that way and I imagine it would be easier to design and support one sensor size. It would be nice if Nikon made a bold advance over Canon and start the switch to full frame. We shall see what they have planned at Photokina.
