Support Head-Fi.org by
starting all of your
Amazon.com shopping by
clicking here.
____________________________________________________________________
Today's Featured Head-Fi Blog: A Japanese headfier's monologue (Sasaki)
____________________________________________________________________
Please help
support Head-Fi by becoming a Contributing Member
CLICK
HERE -- Contributing Members, thank you
for your generous support! --
Finally ready to jump for a DSLR, and I've been doing some research, but still not 100% sure which of these to get. I like the D80 but don't exactly plan to get too many lenses (probably 3 at most), would it still be worth it without more lenses? Or should I save a bit and go for the D40X or D60? To save some money or just go for the top, that is the question...
Finally ready to jump for a DSLR, and I've been doing some research, but still not 100% sure which of these to get. I like the D80 but don't exactly plan to get too many lenses (probably 3 at most), would it still be worth it without more lenses? Or should I save a bit and go for the D40X or D60? To save some money or just go for the top, that is the question...
Dude, top would be D300/D700. Or D3.
D80 is the better choice, because it lets you use better lenses that don't have the motor built-in, which the D40/D40X/D60 won't be able to use in AF mode. The D80 is actually quite a good camera. Wait for the D80 replacement though, I think it's almost time for it to be refreshed or replaced.
Or go Canon.
__________________
Team All My Equipment is Going or Gone Team!
Team Distillation & Consolidation Team
Team UE11 Team
Team Palindrome Team
Team Canon Team
Headphoneus Supremus Landscape-Photo-Fi Organizer for Can Jam '09
I'd only get the D40/60 if you want the smallest possible Nikon DSLR. The D80 has a much better autofocus system, is compatible with many more lenses, and has a better viewfinder. And it really isn't THAT much bigger than the 40/60, certainly quite a bit smaller/lighter than the 200/300/700.
Although i'm a Canon user, i must say im very tempted by offerings from Pentax, Olympus, Sony and the like...Explore your options first before deciding on a brand i say..
The latest offerings from Sony look very nice!
__________________
Home : Lenco/Rega/Denon/Jolida Vinyl rig / Modded Pioneer DVD - >Meier Headfive - > Alessandro MS2i
I've been looking at DSLR's lately too, and for no reason, I want to get a Nikon. The D300 is nice, and I almost pulled the trigger, but on second thought, do I really need it as a dslr noob that I am. Maybe it is a good idea to get a cheaper one, and wait for the full-format cameras to become available to a ok price... I could always get some good lenses in the meantime.
__________________ nor_spoon
"Stupidity got us into this mess - and stupidity will get us out." - Homer SOURCE Ontech Monster Dual Mono AMP Eddie Current Zana Deux HEADPHONES Sennheiser HD650 w/SAA Equinox, Grado RS-1, Victor/JVC HP-DX1000 CABLES Zu Gede, Zu Firemine
I was aiming for a Nikon for awhile, but in the end decided to go with a Canon Rebel XSi. Nikon's decision to alienate people from many nice lenses that have a built-in motor just because they didn't start off with a mid-fi DSLR (D80) really limited what lenses I could have gotten for my planned D40.
Thus, I've gone with Canon, where pretty much any of their DSLR lenses are compatible with every of their DSLR bodies.
I was aiming for a Nikon for awhile, but in the end decided to go with a Canon Rebel XSi. Nikon's decision to alienate people from many nice lenses that have a built-in motor just because they didn't start off with a mid-fi DSLR (D80) really limited what lenses I could have gotten for my planned D40.
Thus, I've gone with Canon, where pretty much any of their DSLR lenses are compatible with every of their DSLR bodies.
Very good point. I was considering nikon until the incompatibility of their lenses confused me. If image stabilization is importation for you, and you don't want to pay a premium, consider Sony or Olympus with the built-in IS in the body. Saves on cost and size.
__________________
Home : Lenco/Rega/Denon/Jolida Vinyl rig / Modded Pioneer DVD - >Meier Headfive - > Alessandro MS2i
Very good point. I was considering nikon until the incompatibility of their lenses confused me. If image stabilization is importation for you, and you don't want to pay a premium, consider Sony or Olympus with the built-in IS in the body. Saves on cost and size.
I was going to get a D60 too, until the whole lens thing got pointed out to me. Bleh! Most of the nice primes don't work with the D40/60, which sucks because I seem to have become a prime shooter, lately.
Lay off the soda and the coffee to reduce shake.
__________________
Team All My Equipment is Going or Gone Team!
Team Distillation & Consolidation Team
Team UE11 Team
Team Palindrome Team
Team Canon Team
I love the D80 the grip is just right and the body ain't too big. I have tried the small DSLRs but the grip is a awkward for me. The grip of the D80 is very natural for me, smaller than that and I have to use more force to hold the camera.
Having a D80 is expensive because immediately after you get it you will want more lenses. I just got mine and I am already contemplating getting a macro lens :P
__________________ Portable rig:
Cowon D2 --> Silver mini to mini by N_maher --> RSA Tomahawk --> LiveWires T1 / Sleek-Audio SA6 / Yuin OK1. Home rig:
Marantz CD6002 --> Head-Direct EF1 --> AKG K701 / Sennheiser HD580 without foam, with HD600 grills, Dowin cable.
Looks like I'll go for the D80 then, size isn't really a concern of mine.
I already know I want one of these Nikons btw, I've physically seen each one and like their design, plus they use SD memory cards - my laptop has an SD reader built-in, and I don't want to have to get a card reader for another memory card type.
Nikon D40X, D60, or D80?
Linear Mode
