Support Head-Fi.org by
starting all of your
Amazon.com shopping by
clicking here.
____________________________________________________________________
Today's Featured Head-Fi Blog: A Japanese headfier's monologue (Sasaki)
____________________________________________________________________
Please help
support Head-Fi by becoming a Contributing Member
CLICK
HERE -- Contributing Members, thank you
for your generous support! --
Anyone else refreshing Engadget every five minutes? If so, what hot gear you have your eye on?
I've been looking for a new LCD TV for my guy room, and the Sharp "Game-centric LCD" might just be the ticket:
"Fast Input Switching" Now that's sounds nice for someone like me who's skipping 'tween PC, TV, DVD, and 360 inputs all the time...On the other hand, us Yanks can finally drop 2.5k (retail) on a Sony XEL-1:
Sony also displayed a 27" OLED on the floor. So what's the deal with the OLED? I know insane Contrast, paper thin, but what are the negatives, if any?
Last edited by virometal; 01-07-2008 at 04:29 AM..
^ The best part of that display, it's DLP (Wired) so may be surprisingly reasonably priced for Alienware that is.
Too bad it's Alienware: I had to replace a $4000 Alienware laptop because they didn't know how to fix it. God knows how expensive one of their displays are when you factor that in!!!
I might actually get into Blu-Ray when this comes to market:
Sony also displayed a 27" OLED on the floor. So what's the deal with the OLED? I know insane Contrast, paper thin, but what are the negatives, if any?
New technology (IE might have some kinks to sort out)...notice most reviews of TVs still give the nod to Pioneer plasmas as having the best color (the Kuro line). But I do think that the new LED technologies are really going to look awesome with future generation video codecs. They can offer HDR relatively inexpensively. I notice that one of the features of that Panasonic player I just linked was that it processes video at 12bpc. Right now movies are encoded at 8bpc, and I hope that with all these HDR technologies, the video consortiums start coming up with compression standards that go up to 16bpc.
__________________ Home Rig/ Digital: Music Hall Maverick SACD>Benchmark DAC1>SinglePower PPX3 SLAM Home Rig/ analog: Music Hall MMF-5>NAD PP-2>SinglePower PPX3 SLAM Portable Rig: Sony D-555 Discman>HeadRoom Microamp Photo-Fi: Canon 5D, Canon 135mm 2.0L, Canon 70-200mm 2.8L, Canon 100mm 2.8 macro, Canon 50mm 1.4, Tamron 28-75mm 2.8, Canon 580EX flash Headphones: HD650(silver dragon), SR325i, HD595, HD580 (modded), k501:Sold....just not into AKG
I've never seen a LCD with a larger than 22" screen that looks good.
__________________
R.I.P. Sweetpea
Portable: iPod 5.5G 80GB, Atrio m5, modded Marshmellows, and every tip known to man!
Home: Yamaha RX-V1400, Harman Kardon Signature 1.5 & 2.1, (2) Sony DVP-CX965V, Sony RDC-W500C, Motorolla DCT6412 III, Zenith DVB318, Slim PS2, Paradigm Monitors: (2) 11 v.4, (4) 5 v.3, (1) highly modded CC-370 v.3, SVS PB12 Ultra/2, TrippLite power protection, Custom built FlexiRack, Miles of cables organized with velcro, and a soon to be replaced crappy Samsung 47" RPHDTV
Sony also displayed a 27" OLED on the floor. So what's the deal with the OLED? I know insane Contrast, paper thin, but what are the negatives, if any?
Degradation. The organic material in OLED displays degrade much faster than existing display technologies. Even worse, different colors degrade at significantly different rates (blue sub pixels degrade 2-3x faster than red and green pixels), leading to usable display lifetimes that are shorter than the already short pixel lifetimes.
In current applications, mostly phones, car head units, and mp3 players, short product lifespans and generally low fidelity requirements make these downsides a nonissue.
__________________
Simplified Rig: iPod Video > Shure E500
My Feedback
I've never seen a LCD with a larger than 22" screen that looks good.
Eh? 22"ers are almost all TN. The more popular 24", 27" and 30"ers are PMA/MVA or S-IPS, which means if you got a well known >24", it'd definitely look better than a well known 22"