You are in HeadRoom's Premier Sponsor Forum at Head-Fi.org.
To get back to Head-Fi.org's Main Forums, click here.
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Today's Posts Search
 

Go Back   Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio > Premier Sponsor Forums and Sponsor Forums > HeadRoom Premier Sponsor Forum
 


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2009, 10:46 PM
Junior Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 14
Default Sound Improvement Micro DAC

Ok...So I have a Micro Amp and a set of HD650's


Can anyone please explain to me what kind of SQ improvement would a Micro DAC provide?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2009, 01:51 AM
moogoob's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,974
Default

Compared to which source? IE what do you currently have your Micro amp plugged into?
__________________
A List of Stuff (put into words):
I listen at home with a pair of Grado SR325i goldies or Sennheiser HD650s plugged into a bottom-heavy Headroom Micro Stack. Mostly I use a computer as a source, but have a vintage Technics turntable for when I feel like vinyl. I like metal, goth, trance, industrial, synthpop, classical and downtempo.

Founder, team always fiddling with the volume knob
Moogoob's current hobby status: Damned Enthusiast.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2009, 02:58 AM
aimlink's Avatar
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pltan View Post
Ok...So I have a Micro Amp and a set of HD650's


Can anyone please explain to me what kind of SQ improvement would a Micro DAC provide?
Depends on what you currently have doing your digital to analog conversion for you. When I switched to a dedicated DAC, I did so when originally using the headphone output on my iMac. I got both a DAC and headphone AMP.

I don't use the MicroDAC, but I'm sure it would make for superior Digital to Analog conversion when compared to my iMac. I use a FireStone Spitfire DAC and am sure the MicroDAC should be at least as good.

The HD 650's deserve a good source of sound and a good amp, so I'd recommend beefing up the source.

Last edited by aimlink; 01-13-2009 at 03:02 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2009, 11:52 AM
Junior Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Posts: 14
Default

Straight from PC , Sound Blaster
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2009, 12:26 PM
aimlink's Avatar
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pltan View Post
Straight from PC , Sound Blaster
Then the MicroDAC will make a big difference, especially if you're playing either lossless format music files or high bitrate mp3's. In my experience, the better recordings with very good sound production benefit most from the DAC.
__________________
My Feedback
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2009, 02:13 PM
moogoob's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,974
Default

Agreed, Aimlink.

Though I can't speak for the regular Micro DAC, the Ultra Micro I have offered improved speed, soundstage and fine texture over what I was using before (A Total Bithead connected to my Micro AMp w/ mini-mini). Compared to straight out of my laptop it's night and day.

EDIT: And the noise floor of both the Micro and Ultra Micro are fantastic. Huge dynamics!
__________________
A List of Stuff (put into words):
I listen at home with a pair of Grado SR325i goldies or Sennheiser HD650s plugged into a bottom-heavy Headroom Micro Stack. Mostly I use a computer as a source, but have a vintage Technics turntable for when I feel like vinyl. I like metal, goth, trance, industrial, synthpop, classical and downtempo.

Founder, team always fiddling with the volume knob
Moogoob's current hobby status: Damned Enthusiast.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2009, 07:04 PM
aimlink's Avatar
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by moogoob View Post
Agreed, Aimlink.

Though I can't speak for the regular Micro DAC, the Ultra Micro I have offered improved speed, soundstage and fine texture over what I was using before (A Total Bithead connected to my Micro AMp w/ mini-mini). Compared to straight out of my laptop it's night and day.

EDIT: And the noise floor of both the Micro and Ultra Micro are fantastic. Huge dynamics!
Even straight from the computer, the HD 650's sound way better than what the majority has ever heard from headphones.

To me, the quality moves from good to terrific. It can apparently be fabulous if you move up from just entry level DAC's to a more robust and as a result, more pricey one.
__________________
My Feedback
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-02-2009, 04:00 AM
fallsroad's Avatar
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pltan View Post
Ok...So I have a Micro Amp and a set of HD650's


Can anyone please explain to me what kind of SQ improvement would a Micro DAC provide?
Everything gets significantly better, IMO. I have the 650s and a McCormack Headphone Amp, and the difference is startling. I listen primarily to lossless encoded music, but even MP3s benefit.

Better dynamics, bass, clarity, and on and on. The word that comes to mind to sum it up is resolution. I feel like I'm hearing deeper into the recordings, and that makes me very happy. And the noise floor is dead silent, which none of my PC sound cards could even come close to.

Once I got the Micro my computer became not only a fantastic headphone listening source, it is now an additional source for my hifi rig. The Micro DAC also improved the sound of my old Cambridge Audio CD4 stand alone CD player.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2009, 01:06 AM
The Monkey's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 6,147
Default

The MicroDAC was my first good source. I couldn't believe how much better everything sounded. There was so much more separation or "blackness" between the notes. In fact, I had a hard time getting used to it at first. In many of my tracks, I could finally distinguish individual instruments much better, and the music seemed to move much more nimbly. I was having a hard time explaining what it was that I liked so much about it. Tyll summed it up pretty well: welcome to PRAT, or something to the effect. The MicroDAC is what made me realize that my home listening experience didn't have to be a big slurry mess.
__________________
"When stupidity is a sufficient explanation, there is no need to have recourse to any other."

F e e d b a c k
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2009, 04:04 AM
fallsroad's Avatar
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Monkey View Post
welcome to PRAT
I've seen that expression a few times around here. What does PRAT stand for?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2009, 05:06 AM
The Monkey's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 6,147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fallsroad View Post
I've seen that expression a few times around here. What does PRAT stand for?
Pace, Rhythm, and Timing. I think there are lots of arguments out there about what this really means. Basically, I use it to describe that phenomenon when something gets my toe tapping when another piece of gear could not do same. And I readily admit I might be using the term incorrectly.
__________________
"When stupidity is a sufficient explanation, there is no need to have recourse to any other."

F e e d b a c k
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2009, 05:09 AM
Currawong's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fukuoka, Japan (was Australia)
Posts: 3,613
Blog Entries: 39
Send a message via AIM to Currawong Send a message via MSN to Currawong Send a message via Yahoo to Currawong Send a message via Skype™ to Currawong
Default

Pace, Rhythm And Timing. I don't think it's explained well and possibly overused. Now to find that link to the Stereophile glossary...
__________________
MacBook Pro → Audio-gd Reference 3+1 → Phoenix → Sennheiser HD-800, Grado HF-2, Symphones Magnums or Parasound Zamp → Paradigm Titans + Van Den Hul or DIY cabling.
currawong.net | Head-fi Blog | Head-fi feedback | Twitter | Instant-message me
"The trouble with most people is not what they don't know, but what they know for certain that isn't true." -- Mark Twain
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2009, 05:15 AM
fallsroad's Avatar
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Monkey View Post
Pace, Rhythm, and Timing. I think there are lots of arguments out there about what this really means. Basically, I use it to describe that phenomenon when something gets my toe tapping when another piece of gear could not do same. And I readily admit I might be using the term incorrectly.
Ah!

I've seen the expression used many times before, just not abbreviated.

Thanks!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2009, 04:14 AM
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 824
Default

For me the difference between the Sound Blaster and Micro DAC was huge and that was the old Micro DAC!
__________________
My Feedback
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-06-2009, 09:50 PM
Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New York City
Posts: 91
Send a message via AIM to theScribe Send a message via MSN to theScribe
Default

It sounded so good, it made clear differences in headphone sound signatures.

My HD595, Klipsch X10, HD497, pretty much all sounded similar with a little more bass here and there.

I have an old (05) MicroDAC, and these days I CLEARLY prefer the HD595 because of the fidelity and dynamic range it drew out of this phone. Clearly now I can hear night and day differences between those phones.

IMO, a good source is a more vital component than headphones. Try it and see.

-JC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 Head-Fi.org
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:55 AM.