
03-28-2009, 12:59 AM
|
|
Junior Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 9
|
|
Return Ultra Desktop for Balanced Desktop For My 650's?
Hey,
I need some help deciding which amp to settle with. I have purchased the Ultra Desktop Amp and I am using this with the HD650's. My question is would I see any improvements by going with the Balanced Desktop Amp over the Ultra Desktop Amp with my 650's (I do realize that the electronics are lesser quality in the balanced but heh it's balanced)? For the time being I will use the factory SE or balanced cables. I just want to make a decision on an amp, cables is a whole different post! Let me know your thoughts please.
Thanks
Last edited by northfaceseen; 03-28-2009 at 01:12 AM.
|

03-28-2009, 03:24 AM
|
 |
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: North Georgia Mountains
Posts: 408
|
|
Well, my post is basically worthless as I have heard neither the Max Desktop nor the Balanced, but if I could only have one, it would have to be the Max Desktop... ... ...or the Balanced... hmmmm.
Kevin
__________________
Amps: ALO/RWA Amphora, Meier 2Move, Total Airhead
Headphones: ESW9
Source: iPod, 2Move
Alone in my room, lights off, tubes aglow and music flowing, I discovered something. No matter how much hi-end gear I put between the recording and my ears, its the music that moved me to tears. Less is always more.
Kevin
|

03-28-2009, 03:44 AM
|
|
Junior Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 9
|
|
lol, my thought exactly!
Someone Help...
|

03-28-2009, 03:51 AM
|
 |
Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 60
|
|
Preorder the Ultra balanced?
|

03-28-2009, 03:57 AM
|
|
Junior Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 9
|
|
I have thought of that, but I would be relying on a lesser DAC until I could come up with the funds for the Ultra DAC.
I am torn here as you guys can see....
|

03-28-2009, 04:36 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 196
|
|
Listen to it. If you like it, keep it and don't worry about whether or not there's something different that's slightly better.
|

03-28-2009, 05:48 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: israel
Posts: 1,515
|
|
i also agree. if you already got it, keep it. i got the ultra micro stack, and i just can't imagine how good is the ultra desktop with the better connections and other stuff,but probably amazing sounding.
__________________
home rig
TRANSPORTS- marantz CD5001 , computer (foobar+asio)
IC'S- dayton optical , straight wire mini to rca , cardas 6" mini to mini
DAC- headroom ultra micro
AMPS- headroom ultra micro, EF1, earmax pro
HEADPHONES- AH-D5000, RS-1, HD650
portable D2 + PK2
|

03-28-2009, 06:01 AM
|
 |
500+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 680
|
|
I had the Ultra Desktop Amp, but am making the move to balanced... I felt that there was a discernable difference in sound. Then again, if you don't have the funds it might be a better idea to stick with SE for now.
|

03-28-2009, 11:59 AM
|
|
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,439
|
|
I did this comparison (sort of) with the original prototype Desktop Balanced and my 'convertible' (which was once a prototype Desktop Portable).
In the end I found it to be a matter of taste. There were positives to both. Obviously with the same level of electronics in both, the Balanced would be better, but with better electronics in the single ended version, it's a very tough call.
Overall I find it to be a cross-grade - a slightly different blend of strengths and weaknesses.
Last edited by TheSloth; 03-28-2009 at 03:09 PM.
|

03-28-2009, 03:35 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami Beach, Florida
Posts: 16,100
|
|
northfaceseen do you have or will have a balance source? If you plan on going to a balance amp you would need a balanced source to get the most out of it. Also your headphones must be wired for balanced to finish the application.
All of this will come at a high price, so I would either go all the way or stay w/ the ultra micro which sounds superb.
|

03-28-2009, 04:20 PM
|
|
Junior Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 9
|
|
I would be using the built in DAC for my balanced source, as I do not have an external balanced source.
|

04-05-2009, 10:47 AM
|
 |
1000+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,046
|
|
I agree with TheSloth: "Obviously with the same level of electronics in both, the Balanced would be better, but with better electronics in the single ended version, it's a very tough call. Overall I find it to be a cross-grade - a slightly different blend of strengths and weaknesses."
I was planning to sell off the Maxed Desktop after the Balanced arrived, but I've kept them both because they have different strengths. If I could have only one, though, I'd go with the Maxed Desktop. It's much more versatile for my needs. And, as TheSloth says, the electronics are better. In the end, I guess it all depends on what you're looking for.
__________________
Cans: GS1K+BD; K701; HD650+Cardas; HD650 (bal); HD800 (SE/bal); HF2
Amp+DAC: HRDB; HRDmax(Oct'06); m902
Amps: PH100; LD2++; HRDPA; Phonitor
DACs: SVDAC06; TC-7510; DL3
Other: RCD1072; PCD300A; X-Fi EP; X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro
Portable:Muvo V100; MDR-EX90LP
Last edited by feifan; 04-06-2009 at 12:54 AM.
Reason: adding photo
|

04-05-2009, 08:34 PM
|
|
Junior Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 9
|
|
Thanks all for your thoughts,
I decided to keep the Ultra Desktop and I have no regrets.
|

05-14-2009, 06:44 PM
|
 |
500+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: L.A. (Lower Alabama)
Posts: 918
|
|
Are the electronics of the new Ultra DAC the same as the DAC portion of the Ultra Desktop (the AMP+ DAC one, not balanced)? Of course given that the Ultra DAC has circuitry for balanced and the Ultra Desktop does not.
Was considering simplifying one/both of my setups, and as of yet, I am not sure I want to double the price for balanced. Although either would need the better PS probably.
__________________
[Office Unit ] iMac > PS Audio DLIII with lvl 4 Cullen Mod > RSA Apache > AT W5000/Senn HD800/HF-2 > Mardis v3.0 > Tekton 4.5
[Home Unit] MacPro > Lavry Black DA10 / Denon 3910CI > Cambridge Audio 840a > Monitor Audio RS-6 / Senn HD650
[Portable] 2G iPod Touch > Shadow > UE-10pro/Klipsch Image
[Travel] MacBookPro > Predator > ATH-ESW10JPN
[Gym] 2G Shuffle > ER6i
|

05-14-2009, 09:56 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Florida Central Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,751
|
|
OP: My take on this is that once you reach a certain level of attaining a superb amp as you have, any 'upgrade' is probably more of a side-step. My lowly micro stack does a fine job of driving my HD600 and gives me hours of pleasurable listening. I can only imagine what your current set up can do.
Keep what you have. Unless I'm totally in left field, there is a point of diminishing returns.
__________________
Team Minimalist - The joy of music should never be interrupted by a commercial. ~Leonard Bernstein
Head-Fi Feedback
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Head-Fi.org
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:42 AM. |
|
|