
04-10-2008, 04:37 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: E Anglia, UK
Posts: 2,213
|
|
if the alo suffers from microphonics i may pass and try another option, as id like to use it as partly portable
__________________
Phones : UE TF 10 I Denon D2000 I NEW! Ultrasone HFI-780 (S2) !NEW I Grado 325i I Sony SA5000 I Shure SE530
Amps : Headamp Pico
Source : Iphone 8GB L/O I Dell XPS H/O I Ipod Nano 1G
Own I Desire I Rejected Review :UE TF 10 VS SE530
[30% symphonic metal] [30% classical] [25% electro/trance] [10% Other metal] [5% other]
|

04-10-2008, 07:42 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocky Mountains, CO
Posts: 13,095
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al4x
if the alo suffers from microphonics i may pass and try another option, as id like to use it as partly portable
|
See, I think "suffers" is too strong a word. They exhibit some microphonics, but I was never consciously aware of it till Skylab posted about it, then when I looked for it I found it. I was more intent on listening to the music than listening to microphonics, so the microphonics became transparent to my brain. Similar to how vinyl lovers don't hear the pops and clicks when listening to music.
|

04-10-2008, 07:50 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,209
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadphoneAddict
See, I think "suffers" is too strong a word. They exhibit some microphonics, but I was never consciously aware of it till Skylab posted about it, then when I looked for it I found it. I was more intent on listening to the music than listening to microphonics, so the microphonics became transparent to my brain. Similar to how vinyl lovers don't hear the pops and clicks when listening to music.
|
My microphonics discovery was after looking for it also and I found it in a position of use that I had not been using and did not intend for it. So the microphonics that I heard is mote for me.
__________________
Headphones: Stax: SR-007 MkII, SR-003; Ultrasone: Edition 9 (2); AT:ESW10JPN; Sleek SA6 Wireless--- Home Amps: Stax: SRM-252a; Headamp: KGSS(bg) Yamamoto: HA-02--- Portable Amps: TTVJ: Portable Millet Hybrid;-iBasso Fi-Quest----Sources: Lavry DA10 (2); Oppo 981HD; Squeezebox V3; iMod; Sansa Fuse; HeadAmp Pico-amp/dac&Pico DAC-----Feedback: http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f12/slwiser-129086/ <><
Last edited by slwiser; 04-11-2008 at 02:03 PM.
|

04-10-2008, 08:08 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wherever I lay my head at the moment!
Posts: 2,532
|
|
I for one never intended to use the phones while joggin or doing house\yard work, so it's not an issue with me either. Of course if I tap on the cable (which I did upon receiving it) it is microphonic, in that sense. But, I'm usually chillin at home anyway, so it never becomes an issue for me.
|

04-11-2008, 12:26 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami Beach, Florida
Posts: 16,939
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morph201
I for one never intended to use the phones while joggin or doing house\yard work, so it's not an issue with me either. Of course if I tap on the cable (which I did upon receiving it) it is microphonic, in that sense. But, I'm usually chillin at home anyway, so it never becomes an issue for me. 
|
I am not aware of a cable leading up to the headphone housing which will not be microphonic if you tap it. Specially so if it is a few inches away from where it enters the housing.  Some are louder than others but IMO they all do it to one extend or another.
|

04-11-2008, 04:37 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Stump Town
Posts: 1,148
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrarroyo
I am not aware of a cable leading up to the headphone housing which will not be microphonic if you tap it. Specially so if it is a few inches away from where it enters the housing.  Some are louder than others but IMO they all do it to one extend or another. 
|
I totally agree with Mararroyo. Its just like a cup with a sting on it, you know that kids game where you talk into the cup and the sound goes down the other end. Pretty much any think with a wire and a cup is going to transfer some vibration down the line. For me its the sleeving that kind of annoys me, but generally even that is not an issue unless I am moving all about and rubbing the cable on something.
kb
|

04-11-2008, 01:52 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus: Reviewerus Prolificus
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 12,522
|
|
I don't doubt that, and of course I am a HUGE fan of ALO products, as I own about a half-dozen. I did find the cable in Larry's cans to be annoyingly microphonic, however, where the the majority of headphones I own this is not the case.
On the other hand, the sound quality was, as I said, terrific
|

04-12-2008, 12:25 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: E Anglia, UK
Posts: 2,213
|
|
is one of the 2 options less microphonic than the other, and is the stock less so?
its really annoying that the recables are alot more expensive than the headphones as stock, its in temptation area but right on the top edge
__________________
Phones : UE TF 10 I Denon D2000 I NEW! Ultrasone HFI-780 (S2) !NEW I Grado 325i I Sony SA5000 I Shure SE530
Amps : Headamp Pico
Source : Iphone 8GB L/O I Dell XPS H/O I Ipod Nano 1G
Own I Desire I Rejected Review :UE TF 10 VS SE530
[30% symphonic metal] [30% classical] [25% electro/trance] [10% Other metal] [5% other]
|

04-13-2008, 12:33 AM
|
|
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 313
|
|
How do these sound if ran directly through a PC Sound Card(X-Fi ExtremeGamer)? After reading through about 20 pages, I've become extremely interested in these, and if I were to get the stock HFI-780's, I know I'd always regret it, until I sent them in to be re-cabled. So for me, it's either grab the ALO Modded 780's and be happy until I can afford an amp, or grab the un-modded 780's and a decent amp. =\
|

04-13-2008, 03:32 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocky Mountains, CO
Posts: 13,095
|
|
I think they sound fairly decent without an amplifier. The ALO modded 780 from my Macbook headphone out sound better than the stock ones out of a good amplifier.
|

04-13-2008, 03:34 AM
|
|
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 313
|
|
Thanks, I'm sold. I'll be purchasing a set tomorrow. I might have enough left over for something like the Zero DAC/Amp too, so that should help.
|

04-13-2008, 04:26 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,204
|
|
I have been burning in my JenaLab UW recabled 780 continuously for almost a month (>>500 hours) and today I took it for seriously listening session which last for 2 hours - covering music from Jazz, blues, instrument solo, classical (chamber & orchestral), female and male smooth pops, and some ambient, using my Voyager (which has pass 800 hours mark and now quite stable and settled).
This can be one of the best value headphone I ever had, and I am very pleased with what I heard. Granted, the Voyager is not the most capable amp in my rig so I would expect given more juice and better control the ALO-780 can sound even better.
Unfortunately I do not have my Edition 9 to compare (it was sent back to Ultrasone) but from what I can recall, I actually like the ALO-780 for some songs when I prefer a tad less bassy tunes.
Regarding microphonics - it is there for all 3rd party cables I tried, and the JenaLabs UW recable does not make things worse than I expect. I am using the headphone while working so this is never an issue with me.
The most microphonic headphone I have heard so far is the Zu Mobius MKI. The best in this area (least microphonics) I have heard is Apuresound v3 cable with cotton insulation and super nylon sleeving.
F. Lo
|

04-14-2008, 03:46 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocky Mountains, CO
Posts: 13,095
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fkclo
I have been burning in my JenaLab UW recabled 780 continuously for almost a month (>>500 hours) and today I took it for seriously listening session which last for 2 hours - covering music from Jazz, blues, instrument solo, classical (chamber & orchestral), female and male smooth pops, and some ambient, using my Voyager (which has pass 800 hours mark and now quite stable and settled).
This can be one of the best value headphone I ever had, and I am very pleased with what I heard. Granted, the Voyager is not the most capable amp in my rig so I would expect given more juice and better control the ALO-780 can sound even better.
Unfortunately I do not have my Edition 9 to compare (it was sent back to Ultrasone) but from what I can recall, I actually like the ALO-780 for some songs when I prefer a tad less bassy tunes.
Regarding microphonics - it is there for all 3rd party cables I tried, and the JenaLabs UW recable does not make things worse than I expect. I am using the headphone while working so this is never an issue with me.
The most microphonic headphone I have heard so far is the Zu Mobius MKI. The best in this area (least microphonics) I have heard is Apuresound v3 cable with cotton insulation and super nylon sleeving.
F. Lo
|
Great news, and thanks for the feedback. I agree, and have to say it is one of my more enjoyable headphones, right up there with Edition 9, RS-1, STAX SR-Lambda Signature, and Balanced HD600.
What would you say are the particular strengths that make it it one of the best headphones you have had, and other than Edition 9 what have you had now and previously?
|

04-14-2008, 04:19 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,204
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HeadphoneAddict
What would you say are the particular strengths that make it it one of the best headphones you have had, and other than Edition 9 what have you had now and previously?
|
I like to hear tunes that are well balanced. The ALO-780 does just that - great details, refined highs (this is a surprise) and solid textured bass with a tonally correct full range. It is less "meaty" that an Edition 9, but you feel a fresh, relative light weight (i.e fast and agile), yet organic sound. I listen to it attentively for 2 hours and have no signs of fatigue. Very enjoyable.
But it is the most neutral headphone ? I don't think so. It does add the right colour to the tunes that make it easy to the ears.
F. Lo
Last edited by fkclo; 04-14-2008 at 05:00 PM.
|

04-14-2008, 04:52 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 6,209
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fkclo
I like to hear tunes that we well balanced. The ALO-780 does just that - great details, refined highs (this is a surprise) and solid textured bass with a tonally correct full range. It is less "meaty" that an Edition 9, but you feel a fresh, relative light weigh (i.e fast and agile), yet organic sound. I listen to it attentively for 2 hours and have no signs of fatigue. Very enjoyable.
But it is the most neutral headphone ? I don't think so. It does add the right colour to the tunes that make it easy to the ears.
F. Lo
|
I agree with this very much. The ALO-780J is a very enjoyable headphone. It is not as refined as my Edition 9 but very enjoyable never-the-less.
__________________
Headphones: Stax: SR-007 MkII, SR-003; Ultrasone: Edition 9 (2); AT:ESW10JPN; Sleek SA6 Wireless--- Home Amps: Stax: SRM-252a; Headamp: KGSS(bg) Yamamoto: HA-02--- Portable Amps: TTVJ: Portable Millet Hybrid;-iBasso Fi-Quest----Sources: Lavry DA10 (2); Oppo 981HD; Squeezebox V3; iMod; Sansa Fuse; HeadAmp Pico-amp/dac&Pico DAC-----Feedback: http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f12/slwiser-129086/ <><
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5 Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Head-Fi.org
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:44 PM. |
|
|