Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio  
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2006, 05:36 PM
dw8083's Avatar
Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 33
Thumbs up Slim Devices Transporter -- Anyone bought One Yet?

I'm really intrigued about the Transporter! Has anyone ordered it or had a chance to hear it?

-David
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-30-2006, 06:49 PM
dw8083's Avatar
Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 33
Default

I'm surprised no one has bought one of these DAC's yet.

-David
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-30-2006, 07:32 PM
woodcans's Avatar
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 281
Default

I just got one and have very little listening time on it. I am using it as a transport in this setup:

Transporter -> Empirical Audio modded DAC1 -> Singlepower ES-1 -> HE90.

The transporter is replacing my CEC TL51Z. The difference is striking. I was planning to have to settle in with it for a while to notice any difference but from the first track I played I have been more than impressed. Other than the coolness factor, my main motivation for purchasing was to get rid of all the cd jewel cases laying around. This level of improvement in the sound of my system is a bonus I really wasn't expecting. I will not be going back to 'old-fashioned' put in a disc & play anytime soon.

wc
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-30-2006, 10:35 PM
Sleestack's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,169
Default

I have 2 of them, one modded and one stock. IMO, they make for stellar transports.
__________________

2 Channel: TACT RCS 2.2.XP w/ full Aberdeen mods, Bel Canto OneRef. 1000 monoblocks x 4, Aberdeen Northstar Transport, Transporter w/ full Aberdeen mods, Epiphany 12-12s and 20-21s, TACT W210 corner load subs, Audiophile APS Purepower 1050
5.1 Channel: TACT TCS MKII w/ Aberdeen power supply, TACT BOZ 216/2200 (x5) w/ Aberdeen power supply, TACT ADC6 w/ full Aberdeen mods, Denon 5910ci, Eggleston Andra II (x5), Velodyne DD-15, Panasonic TH-65PF9UK
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-30-2006, 11:21 PM
yo2tup2's Avatar
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodcans View Post
I just got one and have very little listening time on it. I am using it as a transport in this setup:

Transporter -> Empirical Audio modded DAC1 -> Singlepower ES-1 -> HE90.

The transporter is replacing my CEC TL51Z. The difference is striking. I was planning to have to settle in with it for a while to notice any difference but from the first track I played I have been more than impressed. Other than the coolness factor, my main motivation for purchasing was to get rid of all the cd jewel cases laying around. This level of improvement in the sound of my system is a bonus I really wasn't expecting. I will not be going back to 'old-fashioned' put in a disc & play anytime soon.

wc
The analog outputs of the transporter are suppose to sound quite good. Have how do they sound compared to your modded dac1?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-30-2006, 11:25 PM
woodcans's Avatar
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 281
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yo2tup2 View Post
The analog outputs of the transporter are suppose to sound quite good. Have how do they sound compared to your modded dac1?
I have not used them yet. Only had the unit less than a week.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-31-2006, 01:54 AM
Junior Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 26
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack View Post
I have 2 of them, one modded and one stock. IMO, they make for stellar transports.
Which one do you think is better? Modded or original? Mind characterizing the difference?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-31-2006, 02:00 PM
1000+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: univ toronto st george
Posts: 1,380
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodcans View Post
I just got one and have very little listening time on it. I am using it as a transport in this setup:

Transporter -> Empirical Audio modded DAC1 -> Singlepower ES-1 -> HE90.

The transporter is replacing my CEC TL51Z. The difference is striking. I was planning to have to settle in with it for a while to notice any difference but from the first track I played I have been more than impressed. Other than the coolness factor, my main motivation for purchasing was to get rid of all the cd jewel cases laying around. This level of improvement in the sound of my system is a bonus I really wasn't expecting. I will not be going back to 'old-fashioned' put in a disc & play anytime soon.

wc
I thought u would get his i2s mod and use the offramp instead
__________________
PC -> lessloss usb to spdif converter -> lessloss dac 2004 with distortionless vol control with lessloss powercable-> lessloss XLR IC -> singlepower es-1 (with upgraded audionote silver foil capcitors, upgraded psu, upgraded silver wiring audio section with lessloss powercable -> stax O2[/SIZE]
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-31-2006, 08:56 PM
dw8083's Avatar
Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 33
Default

It's interesting given all the press and buzz about this DAC that no one here has had a chance to compare it's DAC quality to other DAC's. I'm also wondering how the Transporter's DAC stacks up against the Bel Canto DAC3 or the Lavry DA-10.

-David
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2007, 12:11 AM
morphsci's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
Can Jam '10 Lead Organizer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not Rhett Butler's Charleston (IL)
Posts: 2,338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dw8083 View Post
It's interesting given all the press and buzz about this DAC that no one here has had a chance to compare it's DAC quality to other DAC's. I'm also wondering how the Transporter's DAC stacks up against the Bel Canto DAC3 or the Lavry DA-10.

-David

It is not a DAC, it is a music server that also has a built-in DAC. It has much greater functionality than most DAC's. Please use the search function and you will see that both Hirsch and Sleestack have given some impressions concerning the Transporters DAC to other DAC's/CDP's.
__________________
CanJam'10 in Chicago! CLICK HERE

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2007, 01:05 AM
yo2tup2's Avatar
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 255
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by morphsci View Post
It is not a DAC, it is a music server that also has a built-in DAC. It has much greater functionality than most DAC's. Please use the search function and you will see that both Hirsch and Sleestack have given some impressions concerning the Transporters DAC to other DAC's/CDP's.

I dont think he thought it was a DAC. He was asking about the quality of its DAC (analoge outputs) compared to other sources.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2007, 01:10 AM
Sleestack's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lesserpanda View Post
Which one do you think is better? Modded or original? Mind characterizing the difference?

I know for a fact that the modded one has even lower jitter readings than the already very low stock Transporter, however I can't say that the difference is audible. It is more of a peace of mind thing for me.

I haven't spent much time comparing the analog sections b/c I am waiting on my Singelpower SS-1 to do that comparison for the benefit of headphone users interested in the DAC.

I'm extremely happy with the Transporter and would have no reservation recommending it as a high end digital transport. It is extremely versatile, aesthetically pleasing and most importantly, has allowed me to spend more time listening to music with no sacrifices to fidelity.
__________________

2 Channel: TACT RCS 2.2.XP w/ full Aberdeen mods, Bel Canto OneRef. 1000 monoblocks x 4, Aberdeen Northstar Transport, Transporter w/ full Aberdeen mods, Epiphany 12-12s and 20-21s, TACT W210 corner load subs, Audiophile APS Purepower 1050
5.1 Channel: TACT TCS MKII w/ Aberdeen power supply, TACT BOZ 216/2200 (x5) w/ Aberdeen power supply, TACT ADC6 w/ full Aberdeen mods, Denon 5910ci, Eggleston Andra II (x5), Velodyne DD-15, Panasonic TH-65PF9UK
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2007, 04:12 AM
morphsci's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
Can Jam '10 Lead Organizer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not Rhett Butler's Charleston (IL)
Posts: 2,338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yo2tup2 View Post
I dont think he thought it was a DAC. He was asking about the quality of its DAC (analoge outputs) compared to other sources.
Quote from post #2 -

I'm surprised no one has bought one of these DAC's yet.

-David
__________________
CanJam'10 in Chicago! CLICK HERE

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2007, 04:29 AM
yo2tup2's Avatar
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 255
Default

doh
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2007, 06:29 AM
Meyvn's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta(ish), GA
Posts: 1,951
Send a message via AIM to Meyvn
Default

A couple people who heard them mentioned they weren't that great of DACs. I think it's mostly a high end music server, a DAC second. They claim them as "top of the line" DACs, but everybody claims that.
__________________
All the Dude wanted was his rug back..

main rig: Rega Saturn - (in limbo) - Pass Labs Aleph 3 - AKG K1000 (blacked!)
portable rig: iPod 5G -- AKG K81DJ/KSC75/Shure E2G (kramer modded)

PET PEEVE: An apostrophe does NOT denote when something is plural. Hence, 'the 60's, 70's, HD650's," is NOT correct. All that's necessary is an 'S' on the end. //end rant
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 AM.


Flickr/Twitter

Follow headfi on Twitter!

See Head-Fi photos on Flickr!



Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded)

Head-Fi Blogs
and Facebook

Check out Head-Fi's new
Blogs section.

Featured Head-Fi Blogs:


Jude's "Take My Word"

 From Japan - by Sasaki

Currawong's Blog

(
Start your own Blog!)

Attention
Facebook Users



Join the official
Head-Fi.org
Facebook Group


Flickr/Twitter

Follow headfi on Twitter!

See Head-Fi photos on Flickr!



Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded)


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Head-Fi.org