| Dedicated Source Components Discussion of source components and source formats (CD, SACD, DVD-A, tape, vinyl). |

12-29-2006, 05:36 PM
|
 |
Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 33
|
|
Slim Devices Transporter -- Anyone bought One Yet?
I'm really intrigued about the Transporter! Has anyone ordered it or had a chance to hear it?
-David
|

12-30-2006, 06:49 PM
|
 |
Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 33
|
|
I'm surprised no one has bought one of these DAC's yet.
-David
|

12-30-2006, 07:32 PM
|
 |
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 281
|
|
I just got one and have very little listening time on it. I am using it as a transport in this setup:
Transporter -> Empirical Audio modded DAC1 -> Singlepower ES-1 -> HE90.
The transporter is replacing my CEC TL51Z. The difference is striking. I was planning to have to settle in with it for a while to notice any difference but from the first track I played I have been more than impressed. Other than the coolness factor, my main motivation for purchasing was to get rid of all the cd jewel cases laying around. This level of improvement in the sound of my system is a bonus I really wasn't expecting. I will not be going back to 'old-fashioned' put in a disc & play anytime soon.
wc
|

12-30-2006, 10:35 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,169
|
|
I have 2 of them, one modded and one stock. IMO, they make for stellar transports.
__________________
2 Channel: TACT RCS 2.2.XP w/ full Aberdeen mods, Bel Canto OneRef. 1000 monoblocks x 4, Aberdeen Northstar Transport, Transporter w/ full Aberdeen mods, Epiphany 12-12s and 20-21s, TACT W210 corner load subs, Audiophile APS Purepower 1050
5.1 Channel: TACT TCS MKII w/ Aberdeen power supply, TACT BOZ 216/2200 (x5) w/ Aberdeen power supply, TACT ADC6 w/ full Aberdeen mods, Denon 5910ci, Eggleston Andra II (x5), Velodyne DD-15, Panasonic TH-65PF9UK
|

12-30-2006, 11:21 PM
|
 |
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodcans
I just got one and have very little listening time on it. I am using it as a transport in this setup:
Transporter -> Empirical Audio modded DAC1 -> Singlepower ES-1 -> HE90.
The transporter is replacing my CEC TL51Z. The difference is striking. I was planning to have to settle in with it for a while to notice any difference but from the first track I played I have been more than impressed. Other than the coolness factor, my main motivation for purchasing was to get rid of all the cd jewel cases laying around. This level of improvement in the sound of my system is a bonus I really wasn't expecting. I will not be going back to 'old-fashioned' put in a disc & play anytime soon.
wc
|
The analog outputs of the transporter are suppose to sound quite good. Have how do they sound compared to your modded dac1?
|

12-30-2006, 11:25 PM
|
 |
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 281
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yo2tup2
The analog outputs of the transporter are suppose to sound quite good. Have how do they sound compared to your modded dac1?
|
I have not used them yet. Only had the unit less than a week.
|

12-31-2006, 01:54 AM
|
|
Junior Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 26
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack
I have 2 of them, one modded and one stock. IMO, they make for stellar transports.
|
Which one do you think is better? Modded or original? Mind characterizing the difference?
|

12-31-2006, 02:00 PM
|
|
1000+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: univ toronto st george
Posts: 1,380
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodcans
I just got one and have very little listening time on it. I am using it as a transport in this setup:
Transporter -> Empirical Audio modded DAC1 -> Singlepower ES-1 -> HE90.
The transporter is replacing my CEC TL51Z. The difference is striking. I was planning to have to settle in with it for a while to notice any difference but from the first track I played I have been more than impressed. Other than the coolness factor, my main motivation for purchasing was to get rid of all the cd jewel cases laying around. This level of improvement in the sound of my system is a bonus I really wasn't expecting. I will not be going back to 'old-fashioned' put in a disc & play anytime soon.
wc
|
I thought u would get his i2s mod and use the offramp instead
__________________
PC -> lessloss usb to spdif converter -> lessloss dac 2004 with distortionless vol control with lessloss powercable-> lessloss XLR IC -> singlepower es-1 (with upgraded audionote silver foil capcitors, upgraded psu, upgraded silver wiring audio section with lessloss powercable -> stax O2[/SIZE]
|

12-31-2006, 08:56 PM
|
 |
Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
Posts: 33
|
|
It's interesting given all the press and buzz about this DAC that no one here has had a chance to compare it's DAC quality to other DAC's. I'm also wondering how the Transporter's DAC stacks up against the Bel Canto DAC3 or the Lavry DA-10.
-David
|

01-01-2007, 12:11 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus Can Jam '10 Lead Organizer
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not Rhett Butler's Charleston (IL)
Posts: 2,338
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dw8083
It's interesting given all the press and buzz about this DAC that no one here has had a chance to compare it's DAC quality to other DAC's. I'm also wondering how the Transporter's DAC stacks up against the Bel Canto DAC3 or the Lavry DA-10.
-David
|
It is not a DAC, it is a music server that also has a built-in DAC. It has much greater functionality than most DAC's. Please use the search function and you will see that both Hirsch and Sleestack have given some impressions concerning the Transporters DAC to other DAC's/CDP's.
|

01-01-2007, 01:05 AM
|
 |
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 255
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by morphsci
It is not a DAC, it is a music server that also has a built-in DAC. It has much greater functionality than most DAC's. Please use the search function and you will see that both Hirsch and Sleestack have given some impressions concerning the Transporters DAC to other DAC's/CDP's.
|
I dont think he thought it was a DAC. He was asking about the quality of its DAC (analoge outputs) compared to other sources.
|

01-01-2007, 01:10 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,169
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lesserpanda
Which one do you think is better? Modded or original? Mind characterizing the difference?
|
I know for a fact that the modded one has even lower jitter readings than the already very low stock Transporter, however I can't say that the difference is audible. It is more of a peace of mind thing for me.
I haven't spent much time comparing the analog sections b/c I am waiting on my Singelpower SS-1 to do that comparison for the benefit of headphone users interested in the DAC.
I'm extremely happy with the Transporter and would have no reservation recommending it as a high end digital transport. It is extremely versatile, aesthetically pleasing and most importantly, has allowed me to spend more time listening to music with no sacrifices to fidelity.
__________________
2 Channel: TACT RCS 2.2.XP w/ full Aberdeen mods, Bel Canto OneRef. 1000 monoblocks x 4, Aberdeen Northstar Transport, Transporter w/ full Aberdeen mods, Epiphany 12-12s and 20-21s, TACT W210 corner load subs, Audiophile APS Purepower 1050
5.1 Channel: TACT TCS MKII w/ Aberdeen power supply, TACT BOZ 216/2200 (x5) w/ Aberdeen power supply, TACT ADC6 w/ full Aberdeen mods, Denon 5910ci, Eggleston Andra II (x5), Velodyne DD-15, Panasonic TH-65PF9UK
|

01-01-2007, 04:12 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus Can Jam '10 Lead Organizer
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Not Rhett Butler's Charleston (IL)
Posts: 2,338
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by yo2tup2
I dont think he thought it was a DAC. He was asking about the quality of its DAC (analoge outputs) compared to other sources.
|
Quote from post #2 -
I'm surprised no one has bought one of these DAC's yet.
-David
|

01-01-2007, 04:29 AM
|
 |
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 255
|
|
doh
|

01-01-2007, 06:29 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atlanta(ish), GA
Posts: 1,951
|
|
A couple people who heard them mentioned they weren't that great of DACs. I think it's mostly a high end music server, a DAC second. They claim them as "top of the line" DACs, but everybody claims that.
__________________
All the Dude wanted was his rug back..
main rig: Rega Saturn - (in limbo) - Pass Labs Aleph 3 - AKG K1000 (blacked!)
portable rig: iPod 5G -- AKG K81DJ/KSC75/Shure E2G (kramer modded)
PET PEEVE: An apostrophe does NOT denote when something is plural. Hence, 'the 60's, 70's, HD650's," is NOT correct. All that's necessary is an 'S' on the end. //end rant
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 AM.
|
Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded) |
|
|
Head-Fi Blogs
and Facebook |
|
|
Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded) |
|
|
|