Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio  

Support Head-Fi by starting your Amazon.com shopping by clicking here

Follow headfi on Twitter!

Follow Rocky Mountain Audiofest (RMAF) on Twitter!

Head-Fi Is Sponsored By:

Featured

Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded)

Featured

Can Jam '09
(2009 International
Head-Fi Meet)
Impressions,
Reviews, Photos


Can Jam '09 graphic
courtesy of Edwood

Click on the links below
for Can Jam '09 photos,
impressions and reviews:

blubliss 1, 2, 3
dallan 1, 2, 3, 4
santacore 1, 2
nhat_thanh 1, 2
vpivinylspinner 1, 2, 3
amb 1
augustwest 1
eaglejo 1

johnsonad 1
shellylh 1
Jon L 1, 2, 3, 4
Germancub 1
zippy2001 1
IPodPJ 1
bhd812 1
Edwood 1, 2
abellaw 1, 2
minidiscs 1

atothex 1
HighLife 1
achristilaw 1
SiBurning 1, 2, 3, 4
SiBurning 5, 6, 7
LFF 1
Iron_Dreamer 1
doping panda 1
morphsci 1
ironbut 1
shaizada 1
jasper994 1, 2
jp11801 1
Uncle Erik 1
drubrew 1



(More impressions/photos
still being added.)

 


 

Head-Fi Blogs
and Facebook

Check out Head-Fi's new
Blogs section.

Featured Head-Fi Blogs:


Jude's "Take My Word"

 From Japan - by Sasaki

Currawong's Blog

(
Start your own Blog!)

Attention
Facebook Users



Join the official
Head-Fi.org
Facebook Group


Featured

Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded)

Featured

  #151 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 02:43 AM
pabbi1's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,043
Send a message via Yahoo to pabbi1
Default

No updates?
__________________
Starters: Cambridge 840c -> ApureSound Balanced IC -> Blue Hawaii -> (Stax reterminated) HE60
Bench: Cambridge 840c -> Balanced Bijou -> APS v3 -> Balanced HD800
WIP: Super Secret 'Stat X amp, HD800, Raven
Builds: SDS Labs, , Millett Hybrid, , Blue Hawaii ,Millett Maximus Balanced , Balanced Bijou, SOHAII, Raven, eXStatA,
eXStatA Tube,
Vulcan / Janus (soon)

eBay Feedback
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #152 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 02:59 AM
BrianDonegan's Avatar
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: US, top-right.
Posts: 423
Default

There was a bit of a mixup with the chips. ESS sent me a batch that was not vapor sealed (they are moisture sensitive), but they are sending new ones, so I am just waiting at the moment. I should know tomorrow when the replacements will be here.
__________________
Abiding Diax's Rake
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #153 (permalink)  
Old 06-16-2008, 03:18 AM
johnsonad's Avatar
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 880
Default

Soon, very soon I've got a case and parts ready to go

Any impressions from the 20 or so people that have them already? I know Nebby is busy in the sandbox at the moment. How about the other 19?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #154 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008, 01:42 PM
Beefy's Avatar
1000+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
Posts: 1,450
Default

After a significant amount of research I'm pretty much set on the idea that a Sabre DAC will be my next DIY project. Yes, it must be exciting for you all, but you'll have to wait until later for autographs. Anyway, I've done as much reading as my poor little brain could manage without exploding but still have a couple of minor questions - mostly around the power power supply.

I intend to use the LCDPS and LCBPS and was thinking of using two 15VA 15+15 that Twisted Pear sells for convenience. But to get the 5VDC and 6.6VDC for the Sabre, that is a BIG voltage drop across the regulator considering the voltage coming from the toroid.... more than the drop when normally used at 7.5VDC for the Opus. Are those toroids still OK?

I would like to add a TOSLINK module and a DPDT switch to be able to use both TOSLINK and coax. No problems there, but I was hoping to power the TOSLINK module from the same LCDPS. Is this OK? Would it be better to tap the supplies for the digital or analogue section?

Lastly, I assume the IVY tune-up will be completed and shipped in the correct config to get the most out of this kit?

Cheers for the help folks! My money is sitting here ready to go, and it is all down to who can refresh the Twisted Pear site at just the right time to place an order........ let the games begin!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #155 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008, 01:58 PM
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beefy View Post
After a significant amount of research I'm pretty much set on the idea that a Sabre DAC will be my next DIY project. Yes, it must be exciting for you all, but you'll have to wait until later for autographs. Anyway, I've done as much reading as my poor little brain could manage without exploding but still have a couple of minor questions - mostly around the power power supply.

1) I intend to use the LCDPS and LCBPS and was thinking of using two 15VA 15+15 that Twisted Pear sells for convenience. But to get the 5VDC and 6.6VDC for the Sabre, that is a BIG voltage drop across the regulator considering the voltage coming from the toroid.... more than the drop when normally used at 7.5VDC for the Opus. Are those toroids still OK?

2) I would like to add a TOSLINK module and a DPDT switch to be able to use both TOSLINK and coax. No problems there, but I was hoping to power the TOSLINK module from the same LCDPS. Is this OK? Would it be better to tap the supplies for the digital or analogue section?

3)Lastly, I assume the IVY tune-up will be completed and shipped in the correct config to get the most out of this kit?

Cheers for the help folks! My money is sitting here ready to go, and it is all down to who can refresh the Twisted Pear site at just the right time to place an order........ let the games begin!
Hi Beefy,

1) Yes its just fine. We have actually revised the power supply numbers a bit. Buffalo. I would suggest 7-9V for both VA and VD.

2) Sure powering the TOSLINK module from the same supply as you use for the buffalo VD supply should work just fine.

3) Yes, we ordered some new IVY PCBs which implement the latest recommended filtering approach. they should be here by the time we are ready to start shipping the next herd of buffaloes.

We apologize for the wait. But this is a brand new chip with lot of lessons to be learn on how to get the IVY dialed in to our liking. Also we have had some supply issues with ESS failing to send sealed parts etc... Joy Joy.

In the end I hope you agree It will be worth the wait.

Cheers!
Russ
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #156 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008, 02:58 PM
Beefy's Avatar
1000+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
Posts: 1,450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ White View Post
Hi Beefy....

..... We apologize for the wait.
Thanks for the prompt reply, Russ

No problems at all with the wait... even if I do miss out on this next round of boards. You guys are doing fantastic work for the DIY community!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #157 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008, 05:30 PM
Clutz's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus:
Tells us when we're offset.
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saint Paul, Minnesota
Posts: 2,399
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ White View Post
We apologize for the wait. But this is a brand new chip with lot of lessons to be learn on how to get the IVY dialed in to our liking. Also we have had some supply issues with ESS failing to send sealed parts etc... Joy Joy.
If the chips are that sensitive that being shipped with a broken vapor barrier damages them, how can they ever be operated outside that vapor barrier? I perhaps am incorrectly assuming that the vapor barrier is a sonically welded plastic bag that the chips in the trays are placed in, and not something done to the chips themselves?

Cheers,
Brad
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #158 (permalink)  
Old 06-17-2008, 05:33 PM
BrianDonegan's Avatar
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: US, top-right.
Posts: 423
Default

The problem with moisture is only when you heat the chips, such as in the reflow oven. any moisture that the chip has absorbed expands and can kill the chip. They need to be "baked" at 110C for 4 hours to remove moisture before reflowing (or any high heat exposure). this is part of the reason I am hesitant to sell kits, as it is not unlikely that a good chip will be killed when mounting it if it has not been properly baked. I also want to be sure people get a working module, as the chips are not exactly cheap.

I should add that this is only a problem for us because I was looking at having an assembly house build some boards for us to help meet demand. I got a great price from one place, but they don't do baking. Another place does the baking, but the per board charge is twice as much, and I want to keep the price as low as possible. My current plan, however, is to just start building and make them available as I can. I will try the outsourcing later, when ESS can supply the sealed chips.
__________________
Abiding Diax's Rake

Last edited by BrianDonegan; 06-17-2008 at 06:17 PM. Reason: more info
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #159 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 03:31 AM
fierce_freak's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Salamanca, NY
Posts: 1,851
Send a message via ICQ to fierce_freak Send a message via AIM to fierce_freak Send a message via MSN to fierce_freak Send a message via Yahoo to fierce_freak
Default

The Buffalo is awesome and a clear step up from the WM8740 Opus for me, but it looks like Russ has mentioned in the thread on the other site that he can't choose a favorite between the Buffalo and the WM8741 Opus. Did the upgrade to WM8741 make that "big" of a difference?
__________________
aka LightMeDark and yhamez on other forums
feedback
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #160 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 03:54 AM
soloz2's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Western NY
Posts: 2,240
Send a message via AIM to soloz2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fierce_freak View Post
The Buffalo is awesome and a clear step up from the WM8740 Opus for me, but it looks like Russ has mentioned in the thread on the other site that he can't choose a favorite between the Buffalo and the WM8741 Opus. Did the upgrade to WM8741 make that "big" of a difference?
I hope so cause I've got an Opus on the way!
__________________
feedback
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #161 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 03:59 AM
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 145
Default

In a word, yes. The WM8741 sounds very different to me from WM8740 I think the new filter (especially response #2) is the real reason. Its a completely new beast. Not simply a reworked WM8740. The only thing it really seems to share is the pin out.

Where you can really hear the difference is in high def (192khz 24bit) content. Where the WM8740 seems most happy at around 96khz the WM8741 happily extends to 192khz.

Now I would not say its any better than the ESS chip, its certainly much much closer than one would expect.

What I think is great, is that it is so simple to get wonderful sound out of it. No heavy duty analog filtering required. This chip does its own analog filtering at a frequency calculated to help remove quantization noise.

To be honest I was really peeved with Wolfson for taking so long to get us the chip. But now I am very happy we can get it.

Cheers!
Russ
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #162 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 06:27 AM
fierce_freak's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Salamanca, NY
Posts: 1,851
Send a message via ICQ to fierce_freak Send a message via AIM to fierce_freak Send a message via MSN to fierce_freak Send a message via Yahoo to fierce_freak
Default

Thanks Russ. I figured it must have been somewhat more than an incremental update, and it's good to hear that the filters have been so improved.
__________________
aka LightMeDark and yhamez on other forums
feedback
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #163 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 06:40 AM
Beefy's Avatar
1000+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Halifax, NS
Posts: 1,450
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ White View Post
Now I would not say its any better than the ESS chip, its certainly much much closer than one would expect.
Good to know that I can 'resort' to the Opus if I get desperate

The desirability of the Sabre though is the integration...... no need for receivers, Metronome etc. Some people might like the ability to customise; I just want something easy, regardless of cost
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #164 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 09:40 AM
penger's Avatar
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 680
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ White View Post
In a word, yes. The WM8741 sounds very different to me from WM8740 I think the new filter (especially response #2) is the real reason. Its a completely new beast. Not simply a reworked WM8740. The only thing it really seems to share is the pin out.

Where you can really hear the difference is in high def (192khz 24bit) content. Where the WM8740 seems most happy at around 96khz the WM8741 happily extends to 192khz.

Now I would not say its any better than the ESS chip, its certainly much much closer than one would expect.

What I think is great, is that it is so simple to get wonderful sound out of it. No heavy duty analog filtering required. This chip does its own analog filtering at a frequency calculated to help remove quantization noise.

To be honest I was really peeved with Wolfson for taking so long to get us the chip. But now I am very happy we can get it.

Cheers!
Russ
Would it still be wise to put the WM8741 through the Metronome?
__________________
Feedback
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #165 (permalink)  
Old 06-19-2008, 12:06 PM
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by penger View Post
Would it still be wise to put the WM8741 through the Metronome?
Yes, I definitely like it in there.

I have only taken the metronome out when I have listened to 192K material.

Cheers!
Russ

Last edited by Russ White; 06-19-2008 at 12:10 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Head-Fi.org