Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded) |
|
|
Can Jam '09
(2009
International
Head-Fi Meet)
Impressions,
Reviews, Photos |

Can
Jam '09 graphic
courtesy of Edwood
Click on the links below
for Can Jam '09 photos,
impressions and reviews:
blubliss
1,
2,
3
dallan
1,
2,
3,
4
santacore
1,
2
nhat_thanh
1, 2
vpivinylspinner
1,
2,
3
amb
1
augustwest
1
eaglejo
1
johnsonad
1
shellylh
1
Jon L
1,
2,
3,
4
Germancub
1
zippy2001
1
IPodPJ
1
bhd812
1
Edwood
1,
2
abellaw
1,
2
minidiscs
1
atothex
1
HighLife
1
achristilaw
1
SiBurning
1,
2,
3,
4
SiBurning
5,
6,
7
LFF
1
Iron_Dreamer
1
doping panda
1
morphsci
1
ironbut
1
shaizada
1
jasper994
1,
2
jp11801
1
Uncle Erik
1
drubrew
1
(More impressions/photos
still being added.)
|
|
|
Head-Fi Blogs
and Facebook |
|
|
Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded) |
|
|
|

01-08-2009, 10:14 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,217
|
|
Layout for balanced beta22.. opinions please
I am actually planning on using this exact same (Par metal series 20 16 x 16 x 4) case for my balanced build.
According to my calculations, the nearest amplifier board would be about 4 inches from the transformer and the farthest is double that.
The transformer is 3.75 inches in diameter.
What do you guys think about this layout?
|

01-08-2009, 10:30 PM
|
|
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,272
|
|
The "b" on board 1 isn't capitalised   making your amp unbalanced.
May I ask what you used to draw the layout with?
|

01-08-2009, 10:41 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,217
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by digger945
The "b" on board 1 isn't capitalised   making your amp unbalanced.
May I ask what you used to draw the layout with?
|
 hahha..
I used emachineshop..i will most probably use their service to get my front panel.
so what do you make of it?
|

01-08-2009, 10:55 PM
|
|
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,272
|
|
Thanks for the link.
The first thing your gonna hear from the rest of the guys is "you should consider putting the transformers in a seperate enclosure."
After that your gonna hear "that's a lot of heat for one case."
You gotta ask yourself, if you get it all assembled and you hear the transformers, how much work, time and money is it gonna take to eliminate that.
|

01-08-2009, 11:11 PM
|
|
500+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 500
|
|
16x16 is huge... that's a lot of desk space if nothing else.
|

01-08-2009, 11:12 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,217
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by digger945
Thanks for the link.
The first thing your gonna hear from the rest of the guys is "you should consider putting the transformers in a seperate enclosure."
After that your gonna hear "that's a lot of heat for one case."
You gotta ask yourself, if you get it all assembled and you hear the transformers, how much work, time and money is it gonna take to eliminate that.
|
Hehhe..i know. BUt what gets me is that the toroidal transformers are supposed to have least magnetic field leakage. I did not have any problems with this amplifier that i built about 3 years ago didn't have any hiss or noise problems.
It is known that the magnetic leakage coming off EI cores are some of the worst..
Most commercial and DIY builds I have seen don't use any kind of shielding with toroidal transformers as default.
The risk of there being noise is definitely there and if that be the case, i would then proceed to move the transformers to a different case.
Regarding the heat, that would be less of a problem as i will be using dual sigmas and driving for the most part headphones only. Also I live in the northwest..temperatures are pretty cool here for the most part and the Par metal case comes with ventilation on both top and bottom sides.
One more question, is it prudent to have an inrush current limiter for this build? or is the VA rating not high enough (2 160VA transformers) to justify it?
Last edited by sachu; 01-08-2009 at 11:26 PM.
|

01-08-2009, 11:28 PM
|
|
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,272
|
|
It's funny that you should ask that question, I just now finished reading AMB's post on another thread about the new replacement for the STEPS PS.
He was giving some facts about one of his PS's, talking about the fact that it is designed to have some "soft" start.
You may look for it, it's only a couple of threads away from this one now.
I have also tried to do a fair amount of research on this myself, coming to the conclusion that I may have to use a "slow blow" fuse to help deal with this minor problem.
Thanks again for that eMachineshop link , it's really cool.
Last edited by digger945; 01-08-2009 at 11:32 PM.
|

01-08-2009, 11:33 PM
|
 |
1000+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Indy/Dayton
Posts: 1,317
|
|
The layout looks good to me. I don't think it'll be as big as you think. 16x16 is big, for sure, but its not outrageous. Also, fully-internally shielded transformers are available to eliminate any trace of hum, but they are much more expensive than the regular transformers. Using a ground loop breaker will help with the noise too.
__________________
Builds-In-Progress: β24, Buffalo32S
Sources: Sansa E280 (Rockbox), Lenovo S10
Headphones: HD280, PMX100
My Feedback
|

01-08-2009, 11:35 PM
|
|
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,272
|
|
|

01-08-2009, 11:39 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,217
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by digger945
I have also tried to do a fair amount of research on this myself, coming to the conclusion that I may have to use a "slow blow" fuse to help deal with this minor problem.
Thanks again for that eMachineshop link , it's really cool.
|
Slo blow fuses don't really help with that problem..You would have to install an inrush current limiter. You can test to see if your circuit needs an in rush limiter by hooking up the toroid mains to a pwoer outlet leaving the secondaries open..if it needs a limiter then it would trip the circuit breaker.
we use emachaineshop for some of our reference prototypes..they do a very good job. Finishing is immaculate.
Last edited by sachu; 01-08-2009 at 11:41 PM.
|

01-09-2009, 12:10 AM
|
|
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,272
|
|
I'm sure it would be easy to calculate the surge at "turn on", however in my case (Dynamite) I am copying what others have already used.
Is the pricing for eMachineshop pretty reasonable?
|

01-09-2009, 12:38 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 6,597
|
|
Have you considered power wiring, signal wiring and POT location?  I don't care what transformers you have, you won't want Low-Z signal wires coming out of the pot to run beside the transformers and PSUs.
__________________
Home: ESI Juli@ (I2S) -> Buffalo32 -> Balanced Dynalo / Melos Maestro / SinglePower MPX3
Headphones: HP-2, RS-1, SR-200, Sennheiser HD-600, HD-650, Denon D-5000, AKG K271
Portable: 240GB diyMod 5.5G -> V-Cap Dock -> PPAS -> UE700
Work: EMU0404 PCI -> Buffalo24 -> Balanced CKK-III -> Manufaktur DT770/600
Feedback
Digital Audio Primer
|

01-09-2009, 12:53 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,217
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FallenAngel
Have you considered power wiring, signal wiring and POT location?  I don't care what transformers you have, you won't want Low-Z signal wires coming out of the pot to run beside the transformers and PSUs.
|
The pot would be mounted on the front panel, signal wiring would be all done using shielded cables. Power wiring would all be 16 or 18AWG cables and looking at the layout, it should all be located at the back end of the amplifier. The only wire running from the rear panel to the front would be the signal wires. Shielded wires should do well to clear up any noise issues (solved the problem as i had noise in my other amplifier with the EI cores).
|

01-09-2009, 12:59 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus Moderator Resistorous Conflagorous
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seacoast, NH
Posts: 7,277
|
|
At a minimum I'd forgo symetry and stack the trafos on the left. Put the IEC inlet over there and keep all of your input audio signal wiring to the far right. It'll still hum, I can almost guarantee it, but maybe not enough to be annoying. In the end I question why someone would spend as much money as you are going to and be left with something pretty far from optimal.
Heat is also going to be a big issue, as already mentioned. You'll want to provide a good deal of venting both top and bottom and probably on the sides too. Be aware of all of this when you do your initial setup and decide what bias to run the output stages at.
And I don't see an amp in the link you posted sachu. I see a DAC (only thing with a toroid), speakers, a passive switch thing and picture of a collection of gear. My experience is that DAC's are sometimes less sensitive to noise because they have very little gain so if there is noise on the input you aren't likely to hear it.
__________________
SB3/Arcam CD73 -> Hertsens Signature DAC -> Project Menace -> Woody HF-1 or HF-2
-Head-Fi Feedback-
d-_-b
|

01-09-2009, 01:06 AM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,217
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by n_maher
At a minimum I'd forgo symetry and stack the trafos on the left. Put the IEC inlet over there and keep all of your input audio signal wiring to the far right. It'll still hum, I can almost guarantee it, but maybe not enough to be annoying. In the end I question why someone would spend as much money as you are going to and be left with something pretty far from optimal.
Heat is also going to be a big issue, as already mentioned. You'll want to provide a good deal of venting both top and bottom and probably on the sides too. Be aware of all of this when you do your initial setup and decide what bias to run the output stages at.
And I don't see an amp in the link you posted sachu. I see a DAC (only thing with a toroid), speakers, a passive switch thing and picture of a collection of gear. My experience is that DAC's are sometimes less sensitive to noise because they have very little gain so if there is noise on the input you aren't likely to hear it.
|
Thanks for the suggestions n_maher. This layout is not final of course, chasssi would be the last thing i work on but i want to keep it in mind so i can plan out the rest.
That is not a passive switch thing..
It is the passive preamp + 3 way active crossover + 7 chanel amplifer that goes with my DIY speakers (active). You just add a source to it and you are ready to go. Here is the pic of the setup . IN the middle (the top is the DVD transport, the middle is the DIY DAC, the bottom is the preamp+crossover+7 channel amp all built into one)
The two transformers are the ones at the far left, one is 350VA (drives the tweeter (LM3885) and mid amplifier (LM4780in bridged mode) channels).
The 650VA transformer drives the 2 chipamps (LM4780 in bridge mode) for each of the low channels. The 7th channels is used to drive a center channel speaker when used in a home theater setup (i think it is an OP541 chip amp)
Last edited by sachu; 01-09-2009 at 01:14 AM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39 AM.
|