Support Head-Fi.org by starting all of your Amazon.com shopping by clicking here.
____________________________________________________________________
Today's Featured Head-Fi Blog:  A Japanese headfier's monologue (Sasaki)
____________________________________________________________________
Please help support Head-Fi by becoming a Contributing Member  CLICK HERE

-- Contributing Members, thank you for your generous support! --
Head-Fi Is Sponsored By:
Register FAQ Blogs Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Today's Posts Search
 

Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded)

Featured

2008 International
Head-Fi Meet
(Can Jam '08)
Impressions,
Reviews, Photos


Can Jam '08 graphic
courtesy of Edwood

Click on the links below
for Can Jam '08 photos,
impressions and reviews:


NightWoundsTime
lan
agile_one
wavoman
crappyjones123
Luke G
bperboy
jimaxp

 


Can Jam '08 Logo
T-Shirts For Sale


Head-Fi Blogs
and Facebook

Check out Head-Fi's new
Blogs section.

Featured Head-Fi Blogs:

Jude's "Take My Word"

 From Japan - by Sasaki

(
Start your own Blog!)

Attention
Facebook Users



Join the official
Head-Fi.org
Facebook Group


Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded)

Featured


Go Back   Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio > Misc.-Category Forums > DIY (Do-It-Yourself) Discussions

TTVJ Millett Portable Amp & The Most Recent Sponsored Threads

Sales to Benefit Head-Fi (TTVJ Millett Portable Amp)




 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-02-2007, 01:11 PM   #1 (permalink)
100+ Head-Fi'er

Profile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: EU / Denmark / Odense
Posts: 183
Default Electrically adjustable clock possible?

I have been designing an oversampling DAC for the past year, year and a half (in my rare spare time) and I have been thinking about input and DAC clock variances...

I mean if the speed of the input clock is off even by 1% we are talking 441 error samples a second in a simple 44.1kHz scenario...

Now a TENT XO clock is specified for +/- 50ppm that would be 0.005% now if we asume both ends of the system uses something like this we are talking a maximum variance of 0.01% which is still 4 error samples per second... now while this might qualify as acceptable it is asuming both clocks are TENT XO clocks or equivalent...

Now I was wondering is it possible to design a low jitter clock the speed of which can be electrically addjusted to within say 500 ppm of the target frequency in 10ppm steps or better.

With such a clock it would be possible to compare input and DAC frequency and adjust the latter to match the input without having to fight with input jitter throughout the whole system...

Or is the some brilliantly simple solution I have overlooked?
__________________
Regus
Regus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2007, 03:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Pars's Avatar

Profile
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,068
Default

http://www.tentlabs.com/InfoSupport/...34/page34.html

PPM is a unit used to specify the clock's performance to the specified frequency, but has nothing to do with jitter. I think what you may be looking for is an ASRC? These don't seem to be viewed kindly in terms of jitter performance, however.
Pars is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2007, 04:04 PM   #3 (permalink)
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
balou's Avatar

Profile
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 565
Default

Originally Posted by Regus View Post
Or is the some brilliantly simple solution I have overlooked?
You can change an XOs frequency by changing the supply voltage. I don't know if the Tent XO is a VCXO (voltage compensated) or not - if yes, you must change the voltage quite a bit to get a change of a few ppm, if not, you need quite a stable regulator with very fine voltage control.
balou is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2007, 04:27 PM   #4 (permalink)
100+ Head-Fi'er

Profile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: EU / Denmark / Odense
Posts: 183
Default

Originally Posted by Pars View Post
http://www.tentlabs.com/InfoSupport/...34/page34.html

PPM is a unit used to specify the clock's performance to the specified frequency, but has nothing to do with jitter. I think what you may be looking for is an ASRC? These don't seem to be viewed kindly in terms of jitter performance, however.
Yes and you don't get error samples or loose samples due to jitter...

The problem with asyncrhous resampling is that you you either get error samples or loose samples depending on which clock is faster but if one were to tune the internal frequency to match the external frequency on average not on a clock by clock basis it you get ridt of the jitter from the outside...

And I can't seem to find ICs to take the core frequency from the source and multiply it so i can use it for the oversampling DAC - and it is either that or synchronizing two clocks...
__________________
Regus
Regus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2007, 04:29 PM   #5 (permalink)
100+ Head-Fi'er

Profile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: EU / Denmark / Odense
Posts: 183
Default

Originally Posted by balou View Post
You can change an XOs frequency by changing the supply voltage. I don't know if the Tent XO is a VCXO (voltage compensated) or not - if yes, you must change the voltage quite a bit to get a change of a few ppm, if not, you need quite a stable regulator with very fine voltage control.
hmm are you saying that I could adjust the frequency of an regular Tent XO by changing the voltage?

So that theoretically I could adjust it using some kind of creative feedback circutry?
__________________
Regus
Regus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2007, 05:23 PM   #6 (permalink)
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Pars's Avatar

Profile
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,068
Default

He does offer a VCXO in addition to the regular XO modules. The XO modules probably do not vary with voltage (much). The VCXO is only variable by +/- 100ppm though:

http://www.tentlabs.com/Components/VCXO/index.html
Pars is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2007, 05:26 PM   #7 (permalink)
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Pars's Avatar

Profile
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,068
Default

He does offer a VCXO in addition to the regular XO modules. The XO modules probably do not vary with voltage (much). The VCXO is only variable by +/- 100ppm though. The VCXO is used in his XO DAC module, which retimes the incoming bitstream.

http://www.tentlabs.com/Components/VCXO/index.html
Pars is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2007, 05:36 PM   #8 (permalink)
100+ Head-Fi'er

Profile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: EU / Denmark / Odense
Posts: 183
Default

Originally Posted by Pars View Post
He does offer a VCXO in addition to the regular XO modules. The XO modules probably do not vary with voltage (much). The VCXO is only variable by +/- 100ppm though. The VCXO is used in his XO DAC module, which retimes the incoming bitstream.

http://www.tentlabs.com/Components/VCXO/index.html
Yeah looks good except I worry 100ppm is too little I doubt one can be sure a CD player og soundcard comes within 100ppm, and I really need 33.8688 MHz which doesn't come in VCXO...
__________________
Regus
Regus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2007, 05:46 PM   #9 (permalink)
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
balou's Avatar

Profile
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 565
Default

Well, looks like the non-VC option is right for you, why not go for it?

-comes in the frequency you need
-you're able to change frequency by more than 100ppm
balou is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2007, 06:59 PM   #10 (permalink)
100+ Head-Fi'er

Profile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: EU / Denmark / Odense
Posts: 183
Default

Originally Posted by balou View Post
Well, looks like the non-VC option is right for you, why not go for it?

-comes in the frequency you need
-you're able to change frequency by more than 100ppm
Well by how much can I change it how accuratly and exactly how do I go about doing it?
__________________
Regus
Regus is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 Head-Fi.org
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:10 AM.