Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio  
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2009, 07:52 PM
Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 60
Default Best Lossy audio codec ? wma or ogg

Which one is better ?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2009, 08:15 PM
plonter's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: israel
Posts: 1,827
Default

I actually read somewhere that ogg is supposed to be better than mp3 because it takes less space for the same quality ...or something...
but i don't know about wma. ogg is pretty stable though, and i heard of a lot of people starting to use it.
you can read more on oggvorbis if you want, just google it.
__________________
TRANSPORT:Marantz CD5001
DAC:Headroom Ultra micro (astrodyne psu)
AMPS:Headroom Ultra micro (astrodyne psu) . EF1 , Earmax pro
HEADPHONES:D5000 , HD650 , RS1
IC'S:Dayton optical , Monster coax , Straight Wire mini-rca , cardas mini-mini
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2009, 08:20 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,978
Default

I've tested MP3 & OGG, prefer latter. Using 192kps OGG on portable system, if that were MP3 I'd just delete them as sound quality is still pretty bad.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2009, 09:52 PM
1000+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: south florida
Posts: 1,321
Default

if you're asking about sound quality, i would rate musepack (mpc) 1st and ogg 2nd.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2009, 10:04 PM
krmathis's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
10*2kai
Head-Fi's Most Prolific Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 31,487
Default

Depends what you mean with "best".
If software/hardware support are taken into consideration then MP3 win hands down. For pure sound quality then probably close call between AAC, Ogg Vorbis and MusePack.
__________________
:: Feedback ::

MacBook Pro → Isabellina → Signature 30.2 / β22 → K1000
MacBook Pro → Isabellina → Signature 30.2 / β22 → SRD-7 Pro → SR-007BL
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2009, 10:58 PM
bergman2's Avatar
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NY/TX
Posts: 609
Default

i ripped all of my cd's to ogg and wav and to my ear there is absolutely NO difference
__________________
J B

Cans: Sony SA-5000; Senn HD650 w balanced Fidelity Audio Cable; Senn PX-100
HP Amps: G&WT2.6F; Earmax Pro
Source: Bada HD-19; Lavry DA10
USB: Trends Audio 10.1 USBDAC
Computer: Zillions of wavs; Foobar w Kernel Streaming
IC's: Zu Oxyfuel; BJC RCA-1; Zu Firemine; BJC 110ohm XLR
PC's: Tributaries Series 9; Iron Lung Jellyfish
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2009, 12:00 AM
donunus's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Philippine Islands
Posts: 6,792
Send a message via MSN to donunus
Default

the latest version of nero aac is awesome! use vbr preset .65(around 250kbps) and youre practically set. I cant hear the difference between this and lossless so far and even 320 mp3s are a little soft for me compared to lossless.
__________________
Team Delicious and Juicy Sound
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2009, 12:29 AM
43st's Avatar
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by donunus View Post
the latest version of nero aac is awesome! use vbr preset .65(around 250kbps) and youre practically set. I cant hear the difference between this and lossless so far and even 320 mp3s are a little soft for me compared to lossless.
Indeed.. I'm at 160 kbps AAC vbr and can't hear the difference.
__________________

Portable: ipod 5g ◦◦◦> Lil-Knight WC LOD ◦◦◦> RSA P-51 ◦◦◦>ATH-ESW10JPN
Gaming: Auzen Forte ◦◦◦> PFR-V1 / ALO HFI-780 / DT-880 / DT-990 / HD600


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2009, 01:14 AM
AudioPhewl's Avatar
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: United State of Britainland
Posts: 639
Default

None will ever be CD quality, though I thought Ogg q6 was CD quality for a long time before getting better equipment. And still, 80% of the time, the differences are near-inaudible.

Musepack is also extremely good, but tends to have worse player support than Ogg.

wma - I refuse to even look into this, as it's closed-source and - I'm guessing - not Linux friendly at all.

~Phewl.
__________________
Senn 480II-13R cans, overshadowed by...
Black Stax SRS-4040II rig - awesome! Loving it! Certainly worth most of the extortionate amount of pennies it cost. ;-)

Compass DAC by Audio-GD - very, very nicely made with a lovely sound. First UK owner?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2009, 09:47 AM
CDBacklash's Avatar
1000+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 1,139
Default

Oh hey, something i sort of know about.
You can get an unofficial oggenc from HAF (google) that sounds ~~lossless at about 160kbps.
^ currently the best available.
Then you have mp3 blade (blade enc)...
then you have normal ogg...
then you have wma...
then you have standard mp3 [lameenc] (about 216 kbps).

You'll probably get the most support from a LAME mp3...
enjoy.
__________________
There are too many people on head-fi...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2009, 04:29 PM
Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 60
Default

Thanks for the answers,

I ripped my flac albums to ogg quality 9
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2009, 04:32 PM
insyte's Avatar
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philippines
Posts: 950
Default

I also think AAC is the best lossy codec available atm
__________________
Feedback: head-fi ebay
Site: HeadPhiles.org Dedicated headphone site for the Philippines. Come visit us :)
Team Linux Team Sennheiser Team Stax
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2009, 06:56 PM
krmathis's Avatar
Headphoneus Supremus
10*2kai
Head-Fi's Most Prolific Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
Posts: 31,487
Default

^ I stick to AAC as well, for those few lossy files I need.
Since its compatible with all the software/hardware I use, and provide pretty good sound quality. Aka -> "Best" (for my use).
__________________
:: Feedback ::

MacBook Pro → Isabellina → Signature 30.2 / β22 → K1000
MacBook Pro → Isabellina → Signature 30.2 / β22 → SRD-7 Pro → SR-007BL
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2009, 07:11 PM
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 378
Default

was gonna say MPC as well, at least -insane or -braindead (which i believe is -7 and -8) but that was quite a while ago, before i made the switch to lossless.
__________________
D
===========================================
My Feedback: http://www.head-fi.org/forums/f12/d_4_dog-16906/
Good music heals your heart but wounds your wallet
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-30-2009, 07:25 PM
Head-Fi'er
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 60
Default

Unfortunately my cowon s9 does not support AAC
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should I go with WMA codec? applaudio Portable Source Gear 16 09-30-2007 12:07 PM
Best lossy codec? TestSpecimen Members' Lounge (General Discussion) 10 09-15-2007 07:55 PM
Lossy Audio Codec's Comparison [HUGE amount of pics] [iTunes UPDATE on p.7] Sir Nobax Portable Source Gear 221 05-14-2007 03:38 AM
WMA Lossless = Tonally Lossy? skitzo Portable Source Gear 8 11-18-2004 05:34 AM
WMA codec.... citywithoutmetal Portable Source Gear 7 07-07-2004 02:23 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 PM.


Flickr/Twitter

Follow headfi on Twitter!

See Head-Fi photos on Flickr!



Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded)

Head-Fi Blogs
and Facebook

Check out Head-Fi's new
Blogs section.

Featured Head-Fi Blogs:


Jude's "Take My Word"

 From Japan - by Sasaki

Currawong's Blog

(
Start your own Blog!)

Attention
Facebook Users



Join the official
Head-Fi.org
Facebook Group


Flickr/Twitter

Follow headfi on Twitter!

See Head-Fi photos on Flickr!



Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded)


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Head-Fi.org