Best FLAC player for Vista 64-bit?

[The Legend]

+1 for foobar2000.

I tried using JRiver MC, but liked foobar2000 better.

[Brewmaster]

+1 for JRiver.

I used to use Foobar but don't want all the work associated with making the interface as usable as JRiver.

[wanderman]

I use foobar2000 the best part of it for me was having sexy looking low memory player.

[liquid steel]

The new interface included since 0.9.5 has made foobar infinitely easier to get into a working interface. If you are exceptionally impatient (I know I am ), there are premade interface themes posted around the internet.

Adding foo_facets.dll to the componnents makes the overall experience more traditional, and doesn't require as much playlist tweaking from the get-go.

I've been using foobar for years, and I am not in the least bit upset that I no longer need columns/panels ui anymore.

[Hibbing]

Foobar.

[TheMarchingMule]

foobar2000!

[helios4]

winamp.
Don't know why some find it slow.
I launch winamp in less than 1 second on my vista pc. Very fast, superb interface (bento) and great asio / flac support.

[sdgserv]

I use both WinAmp and Foobar 9.5 in my Vista Machine

[jantze]

OK, I installed foobar2000 0.9.5.1 and it looks promising so far. I'll be using it stricly for FLAC's, so what settings should I use for playback with Auzen X-FI Prelude?

I'm using Prelude in audio creation mode, 44.1KHz 16bit + bit perfect.

[nothing111]

I was using foobar2000 for the last couple of years, but I recently switched to Winamp. I can't hear any difference in sound quality between the two, but I like the default Winamp interface a lot better (with the new bento skin). It's so much work to have a nice interface in foobar2k.