Support Head-Fi.org by starting all of your Amazon.com shopping by clicking here.
____________________________________________________________________
Today's Featured Head-Fi Blog:  Jude's Blog
____________________________________________________________________
Please help support Head-Fi by becoming a Contributing Member  CLICK HERE

-- Contributing Members, thank you for your generous support! --
Head-Fi Is Sponsored By:
Register FAQ Blogs Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Today's Posts Search
 

Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded)

Featured

2008 International
Head-Fi Meet
(Can Jam '08)
Impressions,
Reviews, Photos


Can Jam '08 graphic
courtesy of Edwood

Click on the links below
for Can Jam '08 photos,
impressions and reviews:


NightWoundsTime
lan
agile_one
wavoman
crappyjones123
Luke G
bperboy
jimaxp

 


Can Jam '08 Logo
T-Shirts For Sale


Head-Fi Blogs
and Facebook

Check out Head-Fi's new
Blogs section.

Featured Head-Fi Blogs:

Jude's "Take My Word"

 From Japan - by Sasaki

(
Start your own Blog!)

Attention
Facebook Users



Join the official
Head-Fi.org
Facebook Group


Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded)

Featured


Go Back   Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio > Equipment Forums > Computer Audio

Computer Audio Discussion of computers as source components, sound cards, USB DACs, media servers, etc.

Meier Audio CORDA HEADSIX & The Most Recent Sponsored Threads

Celebrating 6 years of Head-Fi, Meier Audio introduces the Limited Edition HEADSIX (portable headphone amp) Head-Fi Support Sales Action




 
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2007, 10:03 AM   #511 (permalink)
500+ Head-Fi'er

Profile
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 594
Default

Thanks yourmando, for again sidestepping my specific argument and going after stuff irrelevant for my argument, like a politician
Perfect example: I say such and such measurement is important, and you say oh, there are these tons of other measurements.
Analogy: I go to the mechanic to have a detailed checkup on my car, and he checks everything but the brakes. I ask him to check the brakes, but he says, oh, but I checked all these dozens of other things, everything's perfect!
I think you see the point. By asking him to check the brakes, it doesn't mean I think they are in poor condition, but that they are important for proper functioning.

I think your defensiveness is due to a failure to see that my criticisms already presume that the DAC1 is doing a good job. I'm simply pointing out gaps that make your certainty of unrivaled superiority not fully justified, and your implication that any further improvements are beyond the audiblity, entirely unsupported. I'm sure virtually all commercial DACs suffer from issues I've mentioned, but that doesn't mean they don't exist. I'm not making a comparison here, as it's not something I'm really interested in.
__________________
Chat with us live at #diyaudio on irc.rizon.net !

"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws." -Plato
Crowbar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 11:48 AM   #512 (permalink)
100+ Head-Fi'er

Profile
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 304
Default

I remember when a device with 60dB of dynamic range was considered good. What would it take to *hear* the difference between a noise/distortion floor of -115dB versus one at -125dB? I'm interested in this because the effects of using software volume control seem very slight to me after looking at the Benchmark Wiki graphs.
Lord Chaos is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 01:18 PM   #513 (permalink)
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
EliasGwinn's Avatar

Profile
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 539
Default

Crowbar,

I want to let you know your points/questions are valid, and I am getting some information together to properly respond.

Thanks,
Elias
__________________
Elias Gwinn

Applications Engineer
Benchmark Media Systems, Inc

Producer / Mixing / Recording Engineer
Subcat Studios

----------------------------
Latest edition of Benchmark's FEEDBACK includes articles about system bandwidth and proper interconnecting.

Benchmark's latest creation: The DAC1 PRE
EliasGwinn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 01:47 PM   #514 (permalink)
100+ Head-Fi'er
 
lowmagnet's Avatar

Profile
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 295

IM Contacts
Send a message via AIM to lowmagnet
Default

Originally Posted by EliasGwinn View Post
Monkey,

Thank you very much for this very valuable feedback. I will bring this up with our production team.

Thanks,
Elias
Could you do us a favor and give us the thread type so we can replace screws on units in the field?
lowmagnet is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 02:07 PM   #515 (permalink)
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
EliasGwinn's Avatar

Profile
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 539
Default

Originally Posted by lowmagnet View Post
Could you do us a favor and give us the thread type so we can replace screws on units in the field?
4-40 thread, 1/4" length

Thanks,
Elias
__________________
Elias Gwinn

Applications Engineer
Benchmark Media Systems, Inc

Producer / Mixing / Recording Engineer
Subcat Studios

----------------------------
Latest edition of Benchmark's FEEDBACK includes articles about system bandwidth and proper interconnecting.

Benchmark's latest creation: The DAC1 PRE
EliasGwinn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 03:30 PM   #516 (permalink)
500+ Head-Fi'er
 
EliasGwinn's Avatar

Profile
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 539
Default

Crowbar,

I'll try to round up your questions and answer them here. Forgive me if I miss any...

1. Thermal Memory Distortion

This is, as you indicated, an often overlooked design consideration. I checked out the paper you linked (thank you for the references by the way...it makes for a much more constructive conversation when references are given). It seems they are referring to high-gain scenarios (specifically, power amps).

The DAC1 addresses Thermal Distortion conditions by maintaining low gain operating conditions and using stable resistors. The opamps used in the DAC1 are all operating in low-to-no gain, buffer-type applications. The gain is set with thin metal film resistors which are (pardon the pun) very resistant to changes due to current and temperature. If thermal conditions were to effect the open-loop gain of the opamp, the overall (closed-loop) gain will not be affected much because the metal film resistors in the feedback network are the dominant factor.

Also, the I-to-V converter is external of the D/A chip. This configuration is much less prone to thermal distortion then voltage-output converters.

2. Jitter measurements

When you mentioned that we only tested the DAC1 with jitter frequencies up to 9 kHz, I was as confused as you were. In fact, we measure with jitter frequencies up to 100 kHz. I see where the miscommunication came about, though. On page 34 of the DAC1 USB manual:

http://www.benchmarkmedia.com/manual...USB_Manual.pdf

...we show a measurement of THD+N vs. Jitter Amp and Jitter Frequency. We show about 20 plots of THD+N vs. Jitter Amplitude, with each plot representing a different (constant) Jitter Freq. The consecutive Jitter Freq plots are increased by 500 Hz intervals from 2 Hz to 9 kHz. This plot demonstrates that the THD+N vs. Jitter Amp plots do not change based on Jitter Freq.

The graph on the preceding page (33), however, is what you are looking for. It demonstrates the DAC1's Jitter Tolerance (Distortion vs. Jitter Freq) from 100 Hz to 100 kHz Jitter Freq's.

As can be seen from the two graphs, there is no change in performance with varying Jitter Amplitudes (up to 12.75 UI) or Frequencies (up to 100 kHz).

3. Improvements to the DAC1

There were several points you made about ways the DAC1 could be improved, so I'll try to address them all...

The D/A converter used in the DAC1 is the AD1853. This chip, as it is used in the DAC1, actually achieves linearity down into the -130's dB (nearly -140 dB). I will try to find our measurement graph for this and post it here.

The DAC1 achieves 21-bits of signal-to-noise ratio.

The DAC1 can accurately resolve the 24th-bit (although it will be below the noise floor).

4. Publishing performance plots of the DAC1

I am very glad to see customers analyzing and appreciating the performance plots which are offered in the manual. We would have put even more plots in the manual, but the manual is already too thick. But, due to the feedback I am hearing from you all, we will publish all performance plots of the DAC1 on our website. I will keep you posted (pardon the pun).

Thanks,
Elias
__________________
Elias Gwinn

Applications Engineer
Benchmark Media Systems, Inc

Producer / Mixing / Recording Engineer
Subcat Studios

----------------------------
Latest edition of Benchmark's FEEDBACK includes articles about system bandwidth and proper interconnecting.

Benchmark's latest creation: The DAC1 PRE
EliasGwinn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 03:50 PM   #517 (permalink)
Head-Fi'er

Profile
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Posts: 98
Default

Hi Elias,
Have you guy's at Benchmark looked at designing a DAC with a discrete output stage rather than op-amps? Possibly transformer based such as Townshend use?

Cheers
CanMad is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 04:07 PM   #518 (permalink)
Head-Fi'er

Profile
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 63
Default 192 kHz capability and S/PDIF handling

Hi Elias,

finally I found the time to answer you. Because I thought, this topic could the of public interst, I answer you here. Maybe, it would be a good idea to create an own thread for the S/PDIF stuff at least, though.


I've checked the speed of the crystal as you adviced. The clock is running at 28.322 MHz. However, I don't understand what you mean by "your's may or may not be upgraded". "Upgraded" sounds like changing devices after you already sold them instead of directly manufacturing new models. Except that, I thought that *all* DAC1s were capaple of 192 kHz - at least via the electrical input. So there were some even not accepting 192 kHz through the other inputs?

After all, if the crystal (and the rest of the parts) are able to support 192 kHz, you would just have to exchange the optical receiver by a newer model, right?

However, I doubt if the whole 192 kHz is worth the fuss since the DAC1 is going to convert everything down to ~ 110 kHz, anyway. The only (technical) advantage for 192 kHz material to be played back would be to avoid the conversation to 96 kHz in software (which could be worse) and the theoretical benefit of about 14 kHz Samplerate (the difference between the internal rate and the 96 kHz, resulting from the input's limitation).

Since the DAC1 is able to recognize sample rates over a wide range (not only the common steps 44.1, 48, 96, etc.), I wonder if even the older optical inputs aren't able to receive 110 kHz SR. Thus, playing a file, sampled 192 kHz from the computer and resampling it to the internal sample rate of the DAC1 before sending it via Toslink could work and if the resampling is of the same quality like the one of the DAC1, no quality would be lost (in theory, I doubt that I could hear any difference, anyway).

In regard to S/PDIF TTL from PC drives, I did additional tests and also tried the DAC1 in conjunction of a Yamaha CD-Player which is said to handle the "valid flag" in the S/PDIF-stream correctly.
Although this conforms to the standard, I had to recognize that in the case of the DAC1, this is even a disadvantage to the (strange) usage of the "non pcm" flag, like pc drives seem to use it instead. Why? Because the DAC1 doesn't display invalid S/PDIF samples. :-(
This is a real pity because this way I don't see anything. When using the PlexWriter as source (you could see it on the picture I had linked, hehe), on most (unfortunately not all) errors, the "non pcm" led lights up at least. This is unusual but still better than nothing.
After thinking about it, this is clear. Even when (uncorrectable!) C2-errors occur, the S/PDIF stream itself stays valid, so of course the "error" led of the DAC1 doesn't show this. "Non pcm" isn't the case either (at least when using common CD-players as source). So the result is that the DAC1 simply doesn't have a led to show standard conform C2-errors. This would be a real feature for people who want to know in which conditions their CDs are (C2 errors can indicate a soon death, so one better makes a copy before it's too late).

I wonder also how the DAC1 handles samples, flagged as invalid (VALID=true - the boolean logic is inverted here)? It doesn't show them, that's for sure. But is there a stage which performs interpolation like built into every CD-player or are they simply ignored? Because you have to distinguish between errors on the distance source --> DAC resulting in loss of sync ("error" led lights up) and erroneous content. The S/PDIF standard also mentions parity bits used for error detection. Does the DAC1 make use of them?
Some time ago I had a soundcard, featuring two Toslink interfaces (in and out). When using a pretty long (and cheap) cable between it and the CD-Player, the sound from the sound card was distorted and noise. The amazing thing was that it even gaves a sound when holding the plug near the input. The more the distance, the more the distortion. The DAC1 however either gives a perfect sound signal or no at all. The is no in between. I wonder how it detects that the data is errorfree before converting it to analog. For the standard, here you can find more information:

http://www.epanorama.net/documents/audio/spdif.html

It would be very interesting to know how the DAC1 handles and processes the whole S/PDIF data (interpolation, parity checks, etc.). If someone can organize such an overview, then YOU. :-)

Thanks again, Elias!

little-endian
little-endian is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 05:24 PM   #519 (permalink)
500+ Head-Fi'er

Profile
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 594
Default

Originally Posted by CanMad View Post
Possibly transformer based such as Ayre and Townshend use?
LOL dude, all the tube guys try to build output-transformerless amps, and you want to add transformers... All magnetic core transformers have hysteresis problems and low frequency distortion, and usually phase problems. This is not a hi-fi solution.
__________________
Chat with us live at #diyaudio on irc.rizon.net !

"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws." -Plato
Crowbar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2007, 06:12 PM   #520 (permalink)
500+ Head-Fi'er

Profile
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 594
Default

Thanks for the comments.

Originally Posted by EliasGwinn View Post
It seems they are referring to high-gain scenarios (specifically, power amps)....metal film resistors which are (pardon the pun) very resistant to changes due to current and temperature....the overall (closed-loop) gain will not be affected much because the metal film resistors in the feedback network are the dominant factor.
You're right about modern resistors being sufficiently stable. However, negative feedback is used for correction of static distortions, and its ability to correct for dynamic distortions of this type is limited. Couple this with an opamp's extremely high loop gain...
I'm working on SPICE simulations based on thermal models for transistors, and I'm not sure if I can easily modify it for opamps, but I'm going to try this over the next month or so, as it's easier than the measurement setup described in that paper as I don't have the right equipment.

Also, the I-to-V converter is external of the D/A chip. This configuration is much less prone to thermal distortion then voltage-output converters.
Yes, that certainly helps. I've tried voltage-out DAC chips before and only one sounded good.

I see where the miscommunication came about, though. On page 34 of the DAC1 USB manual
Yes, that clear it up.

This chip, as it is used in the DAC1, actually achieves linearity down into the -130's dB (nearly -140 dB). I will try to find our measurement graph for this and post it here.
Here's the datasheet: http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/...ets/AD1853.pdf
And the one for the AD1955: http://www.analog.com/UploadedFiles/...ets/AD1955.pdf
Dynamic range and THD+N are about 5 dB better with the AD1955 (can be seen in the specs and the graphs as well). The linearity plots are in graphs 19 and 12, respectively. Though the AD1853's LSBs seem to go lower, note the major kink around 117 dB (preceded by a droop). Though it's not very large, the scale is logarithmic so the higher LSB linearity on this graph is less important than something with much larger energy.
Overall though, the difference is not great. The digital filters the two chips use appear to be identical. I guess ADI saved money on redesigning that part hahaha
__________________
Chat with us live at #diyaudio on irc.rizon.net !

"Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws." -Plato
Crowbar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!Facebook it!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump