Originally Posted by Philco
Even the most accurate headphone on the planet will not be able to convey phase relationships from the left to the right channel without crossfeed.
Having that said, with or without crossefeed, it is TRUE that one should seek for the most accurate headphones available.
In my case I find headphones such as the DT770 more accurate than other popular headphones such as the Sennheiser HD600 because they present the sound as is, without much coloration. If the recording is not bassy, then it will not sound bassy on the DT770. If it is overly bassy, then it will be on the DT770. With headphones such as the K701, I fear one cannot know if something is overly bassy or not, hence I find this type of bass lean headphone less useful for my purposes.
What's your opinion of the Ultrasone Proline 2500 ? I'd rather get an open model than a closed model.
I want you to know as I start writing this post that I am not, generally, an argumentative person. There is something odd going on here regarding our opinions of the DT 770.
I learned only very recently that there is more than one model of the DT 770. I have only heard one model of the DT 770. Someone else just asked me which model that was and I'm not sure but I will try to find out. It had a volume slider control on the cable, if that helps to identify it (all the DT 770 models may have that, I don't know).
The one model I heard was somewhat more "bassy" sounding as compared to the Pro 750 and certainly compared to the AKG K701 (obvious, I know). It (the DT 770) also sounded slightly "muffled" compared to the other headphones. I can only guess that the other models somehow sound vastly different than the model I heard. I don't know. I remember that I thought it was a pleasant sounding headphone that presented a nice relaxing sound. It did not seem accurate to me, in the sense of a comparison of it's sound to that of a studio monitor. Whereas the Pro 750's sound seems much more accurate in this regard. When I have the opportunity, I will try to investigate these other models because it is hard for me to accept the idea that our opinions are so different about this headphone.
I like the Pro 2500 very much. I prefer the sound of the Pro 750 but the Pro 2500, to my ears, is a very close second. Have you seen MaloS review and description of the sound of the Pro 2500? It is excellent and very much mirrors my opinion. Here's the link to that review:
Review: Ultrasone Edition 9 and Proline 2500