Should i or shouldnt i??? *Creative Zen Aurvana*

[ads1107]

Well, as title, should i?

They worth purchasing?

Ill do a search here see if i can find some comments bout them!

ta

[AudioNoob]

I believe there are better options such as im 716, djays(or was it qjays), maybe low end freqs, super.fi 5s, more too, search $100 iem I believe youll get several topics on the issue

[ads1107]

sorry, but what are im716?

[wrecked_porsche]

Altec Lansing IM716

[Bizzel]

You can get better value with a metro.fi or super.fi.

[ads1107]

hmmm, how are the im716?

I hear the creatives lack bass, my genre of music is trance, techno etc....

i checked out the super fi 3's, but they have to be worn over the ear dont they? i dont want over the ear style!
and the metro fi's arent armature.......

sorry for all the q's, im abit of a noob!

[HellDemon]

sadly to say, i have 6 pairs or so ^^; (btw you're talkinga bout the IEM, right? and not the full sized cans?)

I treat my earphones with extreme care; all of them, including the aurvana's, but they only have a life span of 6 months MAX; i've literally gone through 3 pairs in the past year

DEFINITELY not worth it; don't ask why i bought so many, s'jus that I have easy access to em; i usually only buy retail for 95% of all my earphones, and i live in canada, so the aurvana's and the se210's are the best i can find out of my local best buy

in terms of durability, as mentioned, they're horrible, the cable's abit short, and although it uses an oxygen-free copper cable like most other high-end IEMS, these are abit weird; they become extremely stiff when exposed to cold tempteratures

The isolation is quite good, though not as good as Shures or the im716 for example

In terms of sound quality, the highs are quite harsh, the bass pretti loud in comparison with the e4c's but is more balanced with the mids and is definitely noticable, and the mids are pretti good

overall, i'd say just go for something else; u can definitely get something better for less than the price of the aurvanas

Edit:

Originally Posted by AudioNoob

I believe there are better options such as im 716, djays(or was it qjays), maybe low end freqs, super.fi 5s, more too, search $100 iem I believe youll get several topics on the issue

D-jays are the lower end versions, Q-Jays are the dual armature $180 ones that're insanely small; if the SF5's are in ur budget, i'd say go for em; and no1's tried the low-end FreQ's so im not exactli shure how the bass would sound for your type of music
If you're a bass-head, try going for the Sony MDR-EX90's; they're definitely in yur budget, as u can probably find them for 60-80, and since it uses neodymium drivers as opposed to armature, the bass is very very loud but abit bloated, and the isolation isn't as good

[DKaz]

Please stay away from the Aurvana. They're are much better phones out there for the money. I would also stay away from the Super.fi 3 if you want bass. They have a singel armature which leaves the bass very thin IMHO. I would suggest the Metro.if 2. They do nto have to be worn over the ear, are much smaller, and extremely durable. $58.00 shipped.

UE Metro.fi 2

If you can stretch your budget (sorry for your wallet), the Denon C700 are an amazing canal phone. I know it;s hard to send that much on your first phone, but it's worth every penny. $141.37 shipped:

Denon AH-C700

[Butter123]

The creative aurvana iem sounds really bad, they lack bass, extremely lacking depth and the mid/vocal is very recessive. the high sounds tin. Don't buy, buy the creative ep-830 instead, save money and 100X better sounding.

[Ishcabible]

Thank you for contributing, but this thread's last response was February of last year...

And the OP hasn't logged on since last March.

I don't mean to be a prick, but how do the thread gravediggers find these random threads?

[ericj]

They use that search feature we keep pointing them to.

[Ishcabible]

It goes by date though. If they did use the search, I'd hope they'd know to look at the date before commenting.

[LeonWho]

the head-direct re2 is great!

[Butter123]

I talked to a creative customer support today, he/she said the aurvana is based on a dual balanced armature support. either that my ear is screwed up or that the low frequency driver is broken. The bass is slim to none. When i plug the earphone into my computer and turn the bass up, the bass becomes distorted, but the high was still there. I remember reading trustedreviews and they said that they got a faulty pair at first and the sounds is very distorted, but after receiving another pair, it sounds very good in there opinion. I just think my EP-630 sounds much better with deep bass and a much better sound stage. not to mention comparing it to my sennheiser IE7, which would be a joke.

[ljokerl]

Originally Posted by Ishcabible

Thank you for contributing, but this thread's last response was February of last year...

And the OP hasn't logged on since last March.

I don't mean to be a prick, but how do the thread gravediggers find these random threads?

Agreed, but it seems your words have been a waste

Originally Posted by Butter123

I talked to a creative customer support today, he/she said the aurvana is based on a dual balanced armature support. either that my ear is screwed up or that the low frequency driver is broken. The bass is slim to none. When i plug the earphone into my computer and turn the bass up, the bass becomes distorted, but the high was still there. I remember reading trustedreviews and they said that they got a faulty pair at first and the sounds is very distorted, but after receiving another pair, it sounds very good in there opinion. I just think my EP-630 sounds much better with deep bass and a much better sound stage. not to mention comparing it to my sennheiser IE7, which would be a joke.