Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded) |
|
|
Can Jam '09
(2009
International
Head-Fi Meet)
Impressions,
Reviews, Photos |

Can
Jam '09 graphic
courtesy of Edwood
Click on the links below
for Can Jam '09 photos,
impressions and reviews:
blubliss
1,
2,
3
dallan
1,
2,
3,
4
santacore
1,
2
nhat_thanh
1, 2
vpivinylspinner
1,
2,
3
amb
1
augustwest
1
eaglejo
1
johnsonad
1
shellylh
1
Jon L
1,
2,
3,
4
Germancub
1
zippy2001
1
IPodPJ
1
bhd812
1
Edwood
1,
2
abellaw
1,
2
minidiscs
1
atothex
1
HighLife
1
achristilaw
1
SiBurning
1,
2,
3,
4
SiBurning
5,
6,
7
LFF
1
Iron_Dreamer
1
doping panda
1
morphsci
1
ironbut
1
shaizada
1
jasper994
1,
2
jp11801
1
Uncle Erik
1
drubrew
1
(More impressions/photos
still being added.)
|
|
|
Head-Fi Blogs
and Facebook |
|
|
Head-Fi's Sponsors
(Premier Sponsors bolded) |
|
|
|
| Headphones (full-size) Discussion of full-size headphones. |

12-31-2008, 01:28 AM
|
|
Junior Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5
|
|
Question about ATH-M50
Hi!
I'm new here (although I started reading the forum A LOT a week ago), but not only new in the forum but in the field, too. I have a question about Audio Technica ATH-M50. I have been reading multiple posts, I started looking for information about Sennheiser HD201 because they were on sale and I ended deciding this (sorry for my wallet, I already know :-p). I just want to enjoy them and make my small investment more durable.
Opinions about them are usually very good, I read that they isolate well (for what I understood, in-ear is always better, but I wanted a closed full headphone), and I like how they look, and hope they are comfortable enough.
My question goes here: I have read in a lot of places that these are monitoring headphones, better for studio, but will they be good for me if I use them unamped with a laptop and a Sansa Clip mp3 player (just for personal enjoyment -- music like alt. rock)?
I am NOT looking for better-and-more-expensive headphones or recommendations (I am new but I have seen a lot of these posts, and this is why I am going from $20 HD201 to the ATH-M50, and is a big upgrade for my budget), but if you have a really convincing argument against them or very good for a different headphones (really close to sub $100), post it here.
THANK YOU very much in advance! Nice community
PS: I have a thread with this topic in the Headphone Amps (full-size) by mistake, I did not see "Amps". If anyone can delete the post, it would be great. I am really sorry...  Thread to remove if possible: Question about ATH-M50
|

12-31-2008, 11:39 AM
|
|
Junior Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5
|
|
Anyone?
I was planning to buy them today, hope somebody can help me...
Thanks!!!
|

12-31-2008, 12:31 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,632
|
|
I have read that the Q40 might be a better option than the M50 if unamped. Some headphones do quite well unamped and others noticeably improve with an amp. Some are satisfied with unamped results, and others are not. I think there's a better chance of you being satisfied with the Q40. Any reason why you're not considering any other headphones in this price range, open or closed?
__________________
FWIR = From What I Read or From What I've Read
Properly adjust your HD650, HD600, HD580.
Team: Preference, Synergy, and Utility
Please make your posts more helpful by stating what equipment the mentioned headphones are plugged into. Headphones often sound worse or much better depending on the source and amp used. Your signature won't help those who later read your post after you've changed your sig to a new rig. Thank you!
|

12-31-2008, 01:48 PM
|
|
Junior Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5
|
|
Thanks for your comments!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Time
Any reason why you're not considering any other headphones in this price range, open or closed?
|
Not really, I just drew a line that I don't want to cross (price range). I have gone up my initial budget too much, but wanted to spend well my money. I'm just not going up (for what I checked, Q40 is almost equivalent in price, I'm not saying that it doesn't fit my reqs).
I liked the reviews on ATH-M50 and I was considering to buy a cheap amp later, but I wasn't sure if they work good enough without amping. I haven't considered Q40 before because I didn't know about them... I'll take a look, although if the ATH-M50 are going to work for me, I like them better.
Thanks!
|

12-31-2008, 03:47 PM
|
 |
100+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NJ...by the beach
Posts: 374
|
|
Equation rp-21 is another strong contender in the sub $100 price range. I like 'em better than my sony mdr-v6's or my k240's for rock...and I use them all the time on my 2G Sansa clip. Lot's of good reviews if you do a forum search. I haven't heard the m-50's, so I can't comment on them.
Last edited by lejaz; 12-31-2008 at 03:49 PM.
Reason: forgot something
|

12-31-2008, 04:27 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mont Chapelle
Posts: 1,999
|
|
the M50 isn't really a sub $100 phone - it is at least $150 from any retailer with a decent return policy.
|

12-31-2008, 04:39 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,615
|
|
Personally, I think it's a fine headphone. The fit is OK, if you have small ears. My ears are about average and it does pinch it a bit and it does hurt after a few hours. The Q40 has shallow cups but bigger openings. I actually find the Q40 more comfortable.
Some people find monitors boring. I don't really. I find the M50 and Q40 more "fun" than something like the K271 or the K701.
Between the 201 and M50 as the only choices in the world, I would take the M50 in a heartbeat. I also like the M50 construction very much.
|

01-18-2009, 06:46 PM
|
|
Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 34
|
|
Sorry to interrupt, but where can you buy ATH-M50 in EU with STRAIGHT CABLE???
I really hate the coiled cables. All the shops I have found are selling the coiled versions, but I know Audio Technica has made a straight cable version.
Last edited by MetalElvis; 01-18-2009 at 06:53 PM.
|

01-20-2009, 08:31 PM
|
|
Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 77
|
|
I use the M50 with a sansa clip - you need to enable volume boost in the clips settings to pump out music at a decent volume (although not mandatory)....the combination sounds great - you will not be disappointed.
__________________
iPod Classic 160GB, iPod Nano 1G and 3G, iPod Shuffle 2G, Sansa Clip 8GB
Senn IE8, Ultimate Ears Triple.Fi 10 Pro, Audio Technica ATH-M50, Shure SE310, Sennheiser CX95, Sennheiser PX100, Sennheiser CX300, Sennheiser MX300
Next up: Westone 3 or Alessandro MS1 or Senn HD650...depending upon when I can be impulsive enough (and delusional) to think I need a new toy
|

01-20-2009, 09:11 PM
|
 |
500+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 812
|
|
I own ATH-M50 as well as M-Audio Q40. For unamped use, I would recommend the Q40 over M50 - the Q40s delivery nice, deep, tight bass response and sweet, detailed mids and decent highs straight out of even very weak sources, like cheap portable players, and really doesn't improve very much when amped. ATH-M50 on the other hand, REALLY needs an amp to get it's act together IMO. Without an amp, M50 often sounds flat and lifeless with a sloppy, uncontrolled bass and recessed mids that lack texture and presence. However, once amped, these cans transform into some really great performers for the price, easily surpassing the M-Audio Q40s in most aspects and offering deep, rich bass presence, natural mids and detailed, sparkly highs with very good extension.
__________________
Feedback
'Phones:
Current: Westone ES3X (Enyo ES cable coming soon!), Shure SRH840, Hifiman RE0, ATH-CM700, M-Audio Q40, Senn HD555, CX300, MX75, HD202, Yuin PK2, G2, UE Super.fi 3 Studio, AMP3 stock buds. Sony EX-085, JVC FX33
Past: ATH-M50, German Maestro GMP 8.35 D, Senn HD25-1 II, Westone 3, Senn IE8, Senn HD380 Pro, Sleek SA6, M-Audio IE40 (rebranded Triple.fi), UE Super.fi 5 Pro, AKG K271 Studio and K26p, Senn HD25 1-II and PX100
Sources:
Current: Audigy 2 ZS + KXProject drivers --> Foobar 2000, AMP3, Sony NWZ-A816 4Gb, Samsung T9 2Gb and U2 2Gb, Sansa Clip 1 Gb, iPod Shuffle 1st gen 512Mb, iRiver T10 1Gb, a generic 1Gb MP4 player
Past: Samsung P2 2Gb, iRiver Clix 1st gen 2Gb, Creative Zen Stone
|

01-20-2009, 09:15 PM
|
 |
500+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 812
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by encrypted_trance
I use the M50 with a sansa clip - you need to enable volume boost in the clips settings to pump out music at a decent volume (although not mandatory)....the combination sounds great - you will not be disappointed.
|
I disagree - the bass sounds quite sloppy and the mids are muffled with this combo. ATH-M50 really needs a powerful source and/or a dedicated amp to sound the way it was meant to sound IMO.
__________________
Feedback
'Phones:
Current: Westone ES3X (Enyo ES cable coming soon!), Shure SRH840, Hifiman RE0, ATH-CM700, M-Audio Q40, Senn HD555, CX300, MX75, HD202, Yuin PK2, G2, UE Super.fi 3 Studio, AMP3 stock buds. Sony EX-085, JVC FX33
Past: ATH-M50, German Maestro GMP 8.35 D, Senn HD25-1 II, Westone 3, Senn IE8, Senn HD380 Pro, Sleek SA6, M-Audio IE40 (rebranded Triple.fi), UE Super.fi 5 Pro, AKG K271 Studio and K26p, Senn HD25 1-II and PX100
Sources:
Current: Audigy 2 ZS + KXProject drivers --> Foobar 2000, AMP3, Sony NWZ-A816 4Gb, Samsung T9 2Gb and U2 2Gb, Sansa Clip 1 Gb, iPod Shuffle 1st gen 512Mb, iRiver T10 1Gb, a generic 1Gb MP4 player
Past: Samsung P2 2Gb, iRiver Clix 1st gen 2Gb, Creative Zen Stone
|

01-20-2009, 09:18 PM
|
 |
500+ Head-Fi'er
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 812
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by holland
Personally, I think it's a fine headphone. The fit is OK, if you have small ears. My ears are about average and it does pinch it a bit and it does hurt after a few hours. The Q40 has shallow cups but bigger openings. I actually find the Q40 more comfortable.
Some people find monitors boring. I don't really. I find the M50 and Q40 more "fun" than something like the K271 or the K701.
Between the 201 and M50 as the only choices in the world, I would take the M50 in a heartbeat. I also like the M50 construction very much.
|
I used to have AKG K271 and found it to be more linear than ATH-M50. They were really, really boring when unamped.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lejaz
Equation rp-21 is another strong contender in the sub $100 price range. I like 'em better than my sony mdr-v6's or my k240's for rock...and I use them all the time on my 2G Sansa clip. Lot's of good reviews if you do a forum search. I haven't heard the m-50's, so I can't comment on them.
|
Yeah, I heard they are pretty good, but I would rather get M-Audio Q40s - they seem more durable and more comfortable and based on some reviews that I read, they sound better than RP21 as well.
__________________
Feedback
'Phones:
Current: Westone ES3X (Enyo ES cable coming soon!), Shure SRH840, Hifiman RE0, ATH-CM700, M-Audio Q40, Senn HD555, CX300, MX75, HD202, Yuin PK2, G2, UE Super.fi 3 Studio, AMP3 stock buds. Sony EX-085, JVC FX33
Past: ATH-M50, German Maestro GMP 8.35 D, Senn HD25-1 II, Westone 3, Senn IE8, Senn HD380 Pro, Sleek SA6, M-Audio IE40 (rebranded Triple.fi), UE Super.fi 5 Pro, AKG K271 Studio and K26p, Senn HD25 1-II and PX100
Sources:
Current: Audigy 2 ZS + KXProject drivers --> Foobar 2000, AMP3, Sony NWZ-A816 4Gb, Samsung T9 2Gb and U2 2Gb, Sansa Clip 1 Gb, iPod Shuffle 1st gen 512Mb, iRiver T10 1Gb, a generic 1Gb MP4 player
Past: Samsung P2 2Gb, iRiver Clix 1st gen 2Gb, Creative Zen Stone
Last edited by Pianist; 01-20-2009 at 09:26 PM.
|

01-20-2009, 09:29 PM
|
 |
Headphoneus Supremus
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,615
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pianist
I used to have AKG K271 and found it to be more linear than ATH-M50. They were really, really boring when unamped.
|
Mine are amped quite well. The K271 is still a very boring headphone.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28 PM.
|