Support Head-Fi.org by
starting all of your
Amazon.com shopping by
clicking here.
____________________________________________________________________
Today's Featured Head-Fi Blog: Jude's Blog
____________________________________________________________________
Please help
support Head-Fi by becoming a Contributing Member
CLICK
HERE -- Contributing Members, thank you
for your generous support! --
I'm debating having a pair balanced (stock cable) and am interested in hearing from members who've gone this route. My (sorry) limited understanding of the advantages of balanced operation seems to suggest that lower-impedance HPs benefit less from balanced drive than do higher -- does that mean that the RS1s stand to be only minimally improved or are there real benefits in your exp?
thanks for your input and best,
o
__________________
I'll be in and out of town between October 26th and November 15 so my be late answering PMs during this time.
Sources: iPod 5.5 /// Azur 840c // Macbook Pro via HR Desktop Balanced Home DAC Amps: HeadRoom Desktop Balanced w/ DAC // Cary SLI-80 Signature (on loan) ///EarMax Pro Phones: Ultrasone Edition 9s [sold] /// RS1 ("vintage") and New ///Balanced JVC/Victor DX-1000 // S2 Audio Balanced HD650 Cables: Chord Signature
....RS-1s gain amazing bass control and speed and the soundstage flowers, where one never existed before. Imaging sharpens, and overall PRAT just increases like they're on roids. There is no doubt in my mind that all headphones improve from balanced drive but for some you have to listen a lot harder for minor improvements than others. This was the case for the GS-1000s. I hesitate to use the term night and day difference, but contrasts between a balanced RS-1 and a SE RS-1 are much greater than those between GS-1000 and a balanced GS-1000.....
...The RS-1s are right up there as well. The RS-1s really are a different animal... when balanced they actually have some soundstage and are nice and controled in the bass.....