Thanks james. It will be on its way soon.Also, it looks like someone from todds staff will notify us with the next address to ship to. I received an email just recently with my address for shipment.
Thanks
__________________
Current Amps: SOHA and NO AMP AT ALL
Current Headphones: Grado 225,KSC 75,PX 100,YUIN PK2
Future projects:Cavelli jones(with 5687 upgrade)
Source: 4G 20G ipod, Dell computer with SB Live card,Phillips 953 dvd/cd player
Work source: Dell optiplex GX620,IPOD
Previously owned headphones: er6i,sr80,HD580 with hd650 cable,PX100,sr225,YUIN PK3,sr325i,igrados
Previously owned amps: Millett Hybrid with diamond buffer bd,Sr-71
So headphonejunkie, how do you think the ttvj millet hybrid compares to the home millet hybrid you owned?
__________________ "Protecting the rights of, and fighting discrimination against, bearded Americans by promoting the growth, care, and culture of the beard"
HEADPHONES: ipod classic -> sik ram din ->
-> PPAS -> AKG K240 sextett EP
-> Xin Supermini IV -> modded KSC75
__________________
60G iMod --> Millet Max --> D2000
Headphones : D2000, DT770/80
Amps : Millet Max, Millet Max CMB #1
source: Oppo 980, iMod, Clip, PC/ emu 0404 USB
In progress:Bijou, soha/jisbos
Came and Went : SR80, HD 25-1 II, SR325i, cmoys, HeadFive, GoVibev5, TotalAirhead, Denon D1000, CK2III, Shure e2c, iPod Video 80G, Cowon A3, LD II, ATH-A900LTD, HD580
I wound up buying this amp on the forums about a week ago. So you can take me off the loaner program list. Or if someone else wants to take my spot, that would be fine.
I guess I might as well leave some impressions. I currently have the Xin Reference as well, and I imagine many of you would be interested in a comparison. I can't offer what some members can in the way of eloquence in description, but I can offer a few thoughts
They have a similar sound signature, they are both of the "laid back" variety. both warm, yet also very resolving, not overly lush or slugish. So I think they are both contenders for people looking for a tube-like sound in a small package. I'll list some differences between the two.
the Xin Reference's non-sonic advantages over the millet are that it exhibits no tube rush, it's lighter, cheaper, and more durable because of the lack of tubes. It has an airyer sound, a lighter and more transparent sound. It is slightly tube like, but it is not as full or liquid as tube amps i have heard. It has some of those characteristics, esspecially in the midrange, but the treble can only be described as silky. It is precise, but just sligtly rounded off for a nice smooth finish.
Both amps have similar bass, warm, and full, but very controlled. The edge might have to go to the Xin on the control department.
The TTVJ Millet Hybrid has a slightly bigger soundstage than the reference to my ears. It has a similar "tube-like" sound to the reference - i say tube-like because it has a lushness to it, but like the reference has many characteristics of solid state precision. It has a fuller sound than the reference, esspecialy in the lower mids, which are rich, and win over the reference. It has more "weight" and body to notes, but less air, and less transparency than the reference. more of a liquid sound. Treble is smooth, but doesn't have the silky quality of the reference.
In listening to the amps, I dont think there is a clear winner. It comes down to personal taste, intended usage, budget, and synergy with your headphones. I thought the reference sounded better with my HF1's, while the ttvj millet sounded better with my higher impedance AKG K500's (K501's). I dont know if this is because of the tubes giving the akg's extra voltage, or just synergy. The more full midrange, and lower midrange of the ttvj millet definitely helps round out the K500's. I would imagine the ttvj would be a good portable option for K701's as well.
Hope that helped. Sorry for the flowery descriptions
edit: I forgot to mention a reallly nice feature of the ttvj millet hybrid. The way the volume knob adjusts the gain. From all the way at zero, to about 11 ocklock it raises the volume real slowly, so that at 10-11 oclock is not loud enough with my K500's. but then as soon as you get past 11, the rate of gain increases mightily. It is as if the amp is saying "you want power? Here you go! Ive got plenty to spare" I don't go much past 12 oclock with any of my phones. This makes the amp incredibly versitile to headphones with different impedances, the first half gives it enough sensitiviity for iems. i imagine iem users and HD650 users would both be comfortable. Not sure about tube rush with super low imp. phones though...
__________________ "Protecting the rights of, and fighting discrimination against, bearded Americans by promoting the growth, care, and culture of the beard"
HEADPHONES: ipod classic -> sik ram din ->
-> PPAS -> AKG K240 sextett EP
-> Xin Supermini IV -> modded KSC75
I thought I would add some pictures of the amp. enjoy!
__________________ "Protecting the rights of, and fighting discrimination against, bearded Americans by promoting the growth, care, and culture of the beard"
HEADPHONES: ipod classic -> sik ram din ->
-> PPAS -> AKG K240 sextett EP
-> Xin Supermini IV -> modded KSC75
In comparison I would have to say that they are very similar. I had diamong buffers in my millett so it does surpass in that department. The home based millett possibly did deliver a bit more bass but that could be attributed to the fact that I used all premium components in my build(blackgates etc..) I think they both are very close. One thing I noticed is the soundstage on the portable(with my 225's) seemd a bit compressed.
I liked the millett portable. If I had a need for a portable I would seriously consider it. It does have a nice tube sound to it. It is warm and does calm down the highs for grados which I like.It is hard to do comparisons. Some differences can be so subtle sometimes.Thinking back when I owned an sr71 I would think the millett beats it in warmth. The sr71 had more soundstage; maybe. It has been a while since I have owned the sr71.
In terms of compression I mean the airiness was not as great on the portable as my SOHA and millett(thinking back on the millett). Of course different tubes are being used.
Greg
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhythmdevils
So headphonejunkie, how do you think the ttvj millet hybrid compares to the home millet hybrid you owned?
__________________
Current Amps: SOHA and NO AMP AT ALL
Current Headphones: Grado 225,KSC 75,PX 100,YUIN PK2
Future projects:Cavelli jones(with 5687 upgrade)
Source: 4G 20G ipod, Dell computer with SB Live card,Phillips 953 dvd/cd player
Work source: Dell optiplex GX620,IPOD
Previously owned headphones: er6i,sr80,HD580 with hd650 cable,PX100,sr225,YUIN PK3,sr325i,igrados
Previously owned amps: Millett Hybrid with diamond buffer bd,Sr-71
Eric Haruki It's coming your way. I'll get it out this afternoon.
I had a lot of fun with this amp. For a portable it sounds awesome. All I can compare it to in the portable department is bithead and GoVibe, This amp is in a whole different class. Compared to my LDII I would call them very close. I'm definately a fan of tubes and the TTVJ Millet gives you the nice warm sound with a punch. The LD has a bit more of a soundstage. Compared to my old Headfive I would also give the TTVJ millet the win. I just found the headfive to neutral and cold. TUBES RULE.......
Thanks alot for the chance to audition a great little amp.
James
__________________
60G iMod --> Millet Max --> D2000
Headphones : D2000, DT770/80
Amps : Millet Max, Millet Max CMB #1
source: Oppo 980, iMod, Clip, PC/ emu 0404 USB
In progress:Bijou, soha/jisbos
Came and Went : SR80, HD 25-1 II, SR325i, cmoys, HeadFive, GoVibev5, TotalAirhead, Denon D1000, CK2III, Shure e2c, iPod Video 80G, Cowon A3, LD II, ATH-A900LTD, HD580
Looking very forward to putting this puppy through its paces. I've owned the Hornet, Bithead, Micro Amp, Little Dot II+, and Move, so those will be my review reference points.
(Ah, I might as well compare it against my Headroom Balanced Desktop as well. mwahaha.
My 'phones are the UE10, Grado 325i, Senn600, and Beyer 990 - latter three balanced.
Review to come!
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamess71
Eric Haruki It's coming your way. I'll get it out this afternoon.
I had a lot of fun with this amp. For a portable it sounds awesome. All I can compare it to in the portable department is bithead and GoVibe, This amp is in a whole different class. Compared to my LDII I would call them very close. I'm definately a fan of tubes and the TTVJ Millet gives you the nice warm sound with a punch. The LD has a bit more of a soundstage. Compared to my old Headfive I would also give the TTVJ millet the win. I just found the headfive to neutral and cold. TUBES RULE.......
Thanks alot for the chance to audition a great little amp.
Thats awesome Deadie, I didn't know your screen name before, hope you didn't mind me using your real name. I'll be interested in hearing how this amp compares to some of the better portables you have.
Have Fun,
James
__________________
60G iMod --> Millet Max --> D2000
Headphones : D2000, DT770/80
Amps : Millet Max, Millet Max CMB #1
source: Oppo 980, iMod, Clip, PC/ emu 0404 USB
In progress:Bijou, soha/jisbos
Came and Went : SR80, HD 25-1 II, SR325i, cmoys, HeadFive, GoVibev5, TotalAirhead, Denon D1000, CK2III, Shure e2c, iPod Video 80G, Cowon A3, LD II, ATH-A900LTD, HD580