Cables, Power, Tweaks, Speakers, Accessories (DBT-Free Forum)Discussion of cables, power (the electric kind), tweaks, & accessories. I, Objectivist: The Objectivist Audio
Forum (opening soon)If you feel the uncontrollable urge to use the word "placebo," in
here is where you'll post (and only here). Discuss DBT all you want in
here.
I've got two recievers, both older, that I am considering to use with a dedicated 2-channel system. It'll be purely for music utilizing Monitor Audio 303's for my mains and a Def Tech ProSub 100tl for my bass.
The first receiver is a Onkyo TX-SV444 at 70watts per channel. with 0.08% THD at 8ohms
The second receiver is a Yamaha RX-V850 at 80 watts per channel with 0.015% THD at 8ohms
The Onkyo has a Sub Out, but with a fixed crossover (not sure on the frequency) and no pre-out
The Yamaha has a Low Pass out fixed at 200hz, and it also has a pre-out.
Which will sound better in your opinions for my purposes?
You own both, and its probably doubtful that anyone out there is familiar with either or both models in question.
Hook them up and listen to them!
It doesnt matter what anyone else thinks anyway.
It matters what you prefer.
As far as name alone, i prefer yamaha.
You also never stated "your purposes".
__________________
*The differences in opinion are amazing! Like,"OMG! These headphones sound awesome!" And,"Those headphones absolutely suck!!!"
*-{Team Zune }- Run Ipod! Run!!! [?]
*Celebrating the joy of music through the best audio equipment i could afford!
If you follow suit,then im sorry about your wallet! :)
*Every new toy is the greatest thing in the world until the novelty wears off......then its on to a new toy :D
You're right, listening is best. But, from purely a personal option point-of-view I would like to know what those with more experience with these two brands think.
As a relative newbie, I know just a little about the reps of audio manufacturers. Just curious if Yamaha and Onkyo are still considered "audiophile" quality components.
Also, extra features aside - will 10 watts make much of a difference?
In general these are consumer brands and quality is so so. Some people like them for HT set-ups but a good audiophile quality integrated amp would be much better especially with the speakers you have. Depends on how much money you want to spend, but good midlevel quality can be had from NAD or cambridge audio, creek and music hall. Good luck.
Lee
__________________ Portable: 160 gb Ipod classic (for lossless files), 80 gb ipod video ---- ALO Cryo Dock LOD ---- RSA Predator ---- Ety ER4p, UE TF10, ATH-ESW9, Grado 125
Transportable when using AKG701 Home: Rotel RB940x to Monarchy DIP----> Bel Canto Dac1 or Thorens 166 with Linn Akito Arm and Benz Micro M2 with Lehmann black Cube Phono Preamp ---- Yba Integre DT Integrated Amp ---- Dynaudio Focus 140; all Nordost wires; PS Audio Line Treatment
Onkyo and Yamaha stuff are pretty much equivalent. I've owned a lot of both.
They do both make some pretty good stuff in their audiophile lines (like high end audiophile Yamaha amp and SACD player). The Onkyo A-9555 integrated amp is winning the hearts of a lot of audiophiles on a budget. So both companies are good at offering good sounding components.
but your components are pretty much the normal consumer grade stuff, I would be surprised if one sounded a lot better than the other. In this range, I'd definitely be more inclined to look for a budget amp like a NAD or Cambridge Audio for two channel duty. I would not want to use a 200Hz crossover for my speakers, most of the time, you want to cross over lower than 100Hz to prevent localization of the sub (you would be able to tell where the bass is coming from)
Would it be worthwhile (for the time being)to use the Yamaha along with an amp of decent quality? It'll be a while before I can afford to upgrade seriously, so I'm just looking for the best I can do for the time being.
I suppose one good thing I have going for me is that these two receivers are the best I've heard in my own home - so I don't know what I'm missing...(my wallet likes this, ignorance is a mortgage payment)
Hi bud
Ive owned a few recievers in my time and personally i would go with the onkyo,as ive had many problems with yamaha ones.
In fact once i took one apart that had stopped working to find that it was full of sony parts!
Onkyo all the way.
Ok, I think I'm going to use the Yamaha as a preamp, and use two Marantz MA500 monoblock amps (150wattx2) to drive my speakers.
I'll watch Craigslist for a decent preamp to come along, but from what I understand, the Yamaha will do this function just fine without negatively affecting the sound. The only downside is its size compared to dedicated preamps.
Beyerfan70, I do agree that Onkyo makes excellent components, even at the consumer-level. I've owned several over the years and all have performed perfectly without any problems. Now that my speakers have outgrown my receiver, I gotta find a better match to reach their full potential.
While I can comment on the specific models, I have had both a Yamaha and an Onkyo AV amp over the years. Personally, I found the Yamaha to be quite bright. The mids and high were just too grating. The Onkyo was better, but still too harsh for my liking. I ended up buying a Denon AVR. I found this to be much nicer sounding. This was not with MA speakers though.
As with any other audio gear, listen and judge for yourself.
Many HT receivers will digitize analog input signals to apply the DSP effects like stadium modes, then pass the resulting digital stream to an internal DAC and on to the power amplification section.
If you are using vinyl or a high-end CD player with a better DAC than the receiver, this dual conversion completely defeats the purpose and you are better off getting a purely analog preamp, even if it is just a passive attenuator.
Most Yamaha receivers have a "processor in" 5+1 input that bypasses this internal DSP entirely. If you have it, I would recommend you use it. Unfortunately, you can only use a single source with it.
Which Reciever is Better for me: Onkyo or Yamaha?
Linear Mode
